Wednesday, December 19th 2007
Intel Delays Three 45nm Quad-core CPUs Intentionally
Intel has recently adjusted its product strategy and will postpone three 45nm quad-core CPUs that were originally scheduled to launch in January next year. Intel has already notified its partners that it will push back the launch of the three CPUs to February or March next year, depending on AMD's schedule for triple-core and the upcoming Phenom CPUs. Launching the CPUs now will not benefit Intel much in its battle with AMD, while they could cause damage to Intel's 65nm quad-core CPUs, therefore the company has decided it is in no rush to release new products until AMD is able to present more of a threat. The three CPUs that Intel plans to delay are the Core 2 Quad Q9300, Q9450 and Q9550.
Source:
DigiTimes
78 Comments on Intel Delays Three 45nm Quad-core CPUs Intentionally
This is bad and could mean less upgrading... so maybe ok in that way but bad in general :P and than consoles take over gaming :S the dread... we could be in for slow improvements in computing hardware down the road :(
and I concur with Craig and Grings. +2
Instructions/clock cycle. Something AMD didn't improve over the K8 and they're facing "arse" now? correct word usage??
Hey nice avatar, Craig!
arse is a brit word for ass :)
oh and arse means, it sucks.. BIG TIME!
Compare 8800 GT 256M with HD3850 256M, the 8800 GT is only $30 more, it has a 30~40% performance increment.
Think long term, my friend, you'd rather invest $10 more on a 20% increment than on a pizza:)
a stream processor handles much simpler math operations than a Unified Shader does, IE m-add, mull operations. If I send a complex thread requiring several conditions, the SP would falter. You have to do some reading on the ATI R600 architecture. I can't put everything here, read this
Anyways, we're going off-topic, please no more GPU talk.:)
:)
^I LOVE this witty chimp :laugh:
If AMD only releases on-par CPUs and decides to wait out the Intel siege . . . Intel might go and get complacent again under the notion they have nothing to fear . . .
BTW, I'm not an AMD fan, but I do think this is a little messed up on Intel's part - at least how it concerns the consumers. I wonder how many companies that were intending to make use of the new tech feel about this little PR stunt.
this is going to turn interesting no matter how you look at it
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 Jan 2008
Core 2 Extreme QX9650 you can pick one up if you got the cash :shadedshu
So there trying to make money but not help the ones with less cash or dont want to spend $1000+ on just a CPU
Im thinking they saw the OC you can get with the lower Q9300, Q9450 and Q9550 that they'll make more money buy just selling the higher ones first
"NVIDIA has created a unique video experience for PC gamers looking for a little insight into whether or not your system has what it takes to play the best-looking, most highly-evolving game on the market today."
heres the link www.readyforcrysis.com/?UHJpdmF0ZXxjYXJsb3N0cnlnc3RhZEBtc24uY29tfDhkODZhYzg3NmZjYmNhY2U1MjNiNDkwODQyZTI4YTMz