Friday, June 5th 2009

A-DATA Presents the Killer Speed of 1TB SSD with XPG 2.5inch to 3.5inch SSD Converter

Press Release by
btarunr
 Discuss (36 Comments)
A-DATA Technology Co., Ltd., a worldwide leading manufacturer in high-performance DRAM modules and Flash application products, presenting the killer speed of eight A-DATA S592 SSDs with XPG 3.5" converter configure in RAID 0 at Computex Taipei 2009. With the utilization of XPG 3.5" converter, the capacity can reach up to 1TB to perform 825 MB/s read and 1,115 MB/s write transfer rate.

The eight A-DATA S592 SSDs adopting the latest XPG EX93 3.5" SSD converter, equipped with safety lock mechanism that can easily secure the SSD/hard drive in 3.5"drive bay without purchasing any accessories, to keeps the valuable data operate in a safety environment. This functional and worthful XPG EX93 3.5" SSD converter is the best choice for those PC user and enthusiasts.

Related News

Add your own comment

36 Comments on A-DATA Presents the Killer Speed of 1TB SSD with XPG 2.5inch to 3.5inch SSD Converter

#26
soldier242
but he still implies that this array won't last a few minutes, which is completly wrong ... the array will fail if one drive will fail and the failure of one drive hasn't anything to do with RAID 0 at all ...
Posted on Reply
#27
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
pr0n Inspectorread his post again. the array fails. not the drives. and data in raid0 drives is very difficult to recover, while being relatively easy for non-raid drives.
The only natural way an array can fail is if the drives fail. Even a controller failure won't affect it.
Posted on Reply
#28
ArmoredCavalry
Unless someone has already said this....

A single drive is no less reliable inside a raid array than outside one.

Considering how the entire purpose of a SSD is to be reliable.... Why would an array of them be a 'time bomb'... that makes no sense.

Does the overall array become less reliable than single drives? Sure... but when you have such high mtf on each individual drive, I can't see it making much of a difference...

Edit:
soldier242but he still implies that this array won't last a few minutes, which is completly wrong ... the array will fail if one drive will fail and the failure of one drive hasn't anything to do with RAID 0 at all ...
Exactly what he said. :)
Posted on Reply
#29
Easo
That speed makes my head ache...
Posted on Reply
#30
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
soldier242but he still implies that this array won't last a few minutes, which is completly wrong ... the array will fail if one drive will fail and the failure of one drive hasn't anything to do with RAID 0 at all ...
btarunrThe only natural way an array can fail is if the drives fail. Even a controller failure won't affect it.
yeah. he isnt providing a reason for an array to fail. the only reason an array would fail is if the drives did - and theres no evidence of that.
Posted on Reply
#31
Unregistered
ArmoredCavalryDoes the overall array become less reliable than single drives? Sure... but when you have such high mtf on each individual drive, I can't see it making much of a difference...
You can't be too impressed by high MTBF numbers. These are just estimates based on a formula that came from god-knows-where. It's probably one of things where they have to sacrifice a goat and read the entrails in order to get the number. :roll:
EasoThat speed makes my head ache...
Probably a bad batch.

Wait, what are we talking about? :twitch:
#32
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
o man i cant wait to move to raided SSD's finally Finally the slowest component in a system is coming together were drive read writes can finally surpass and force the creation of a new bus....as its looking atm with liquid metal and magnatism running some air coolers id say its only a few years time before a non machanical based computer can become affordable for us computer geeks. gentelmen read deep we are in essence witnessing computing history.
Posted on Reply
#33
theeldest
Weergratuitous snip

... but have never been close to risky enough to try a four-way.
Sir, you can't just jump straight into something like that. Take it in baby steps. Find a partner that you're comfortable with, then see if there exists the chance of experimentation.

From there you can move up to the classic Menage a Trois. For most men, this is the finale. It's very unlikely that you'll make it past this point. But everyone needs a dream.

The dream to keep in mind is the elusive Menage a Quatre. The story goes that attainment of the Menage a Quatre bestows immediate and everlasting Godhood.
Posted on Reply
#36
twicksisted
theeldestSir, you can't just jump straight into something like that. Take it in baby steps. Find a partner that you're comfortable with, then see if there exists the chance of experimentation.

From there you can move up to the classic Menage a Trois. For most men, this is the finale. It's very unlikely that you'll make it past this point. But everyone needs a dream.

The dream to keep in mind is the elusive Menage a Quatre. The story goes that attainment of the Menage a Quatre bestows immediate and everlasting Godhood.
i was about to go down the same road and rwad your post :laugh::laugh::laugh::roll:
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 15th, 2025 14:32 EST change timezone

Latest GPU Drivers

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts