Tuesday, March 2nd 2010

GeForce GTX 480 PCB and Cooling Assembly Pictured

Sources wanting anonymity sent these pictures of PCB and cooling assembly to sections of the media. The PCB is that of the GeForce GTX 480, and is NVIDIA's reference design. It gives away a fair amount of information about the card that has created quite some hype over the months, which is slated for release on March 26. To begin with, the GF100 GPU on which GTX 480 is based, uses essentially the same type of package as the GT200 and G80. To help cool the large die (with a 3 billion-strong transistor count), an integrated heatspreader (IHS) is used. However, unlike with the G80 and GT200 (past two generations of extreme performance GPUs from NVIDIA), the display logic is integrated into the GPU package, instead of being spun off into NVIO processors.

With 12 memory chips on board, the GPU connects to them over a 384-bit wide memory interface. The reference design board is expected to have 1536 MB (1.5 GB) of memory on it. There's also an unusual amount of simplicity to the board design and choice of components. The GPU is powered by a 6-phase vGPU circuit using more standard DPAK MOSFETs. There is a 2-phase vMem circuit. With wide open spaces in the PCB, NVIDIA actually made two cutouts to help the blower's air intake.
Power is drawn from an 8-pin and a 6-pin power connector. Fan connects over a standard 4-pin PWM controlled line, while the white 2-pin connector in the picture powers an illuminated GeForce logo on the top of the card (next to the power inputs). Connectivity includes two DVI-D, and a mini HDMI connector. The PCB itself seems to be about as long as reference GeForce GTX 280 boards. The cooling assembly doesn't show off lavish use of copper, but looks equally complex as older cooling assemblies by the company for such GPUs.
Source: Tweakers.net
Add your own comment

93 Comments on GeForce GTX 480 PCB and Cooling Assembly Pictured

#76
OnBoard
l33tGaMeRWill weight be an issue that is the question... The 5870/5970 was getting fairly heavy to support itself...
GTX 280 stock cooler is 548g, doubt this is any heavier. And the cooler mount to the back bracket with couple screws to lessen the load on the card. Accelero GTX280 is 632g and the double core version is even more. Still it's quite a lot when people get scared of 1kg CPU coolers :)
Posted on Reply
#77
phanbuey
OnBoardGTX 280 stock cooler is 548g, doubt this is any heavier. And the cooler mount to the back bracket with couple screws to lessen the load on the card. Accelero GTX280 is 632g and the double core version is even more. Still it's quite a lot when people get scared of 1kg CPU coolers :)
as long as you use the case screwholes, honestly you should be fine... the 9800GX2 weighed 1.1kg. so... yeah... no way theyre gonna beat that this time unless that cooler is made of iron/lead/depleted uranium.
Posted on Reply
#78
the54thvoid
Intoxicated Moderator
A Noctua NH-D14 Dual Radiator cpu cooler weighs 900g without fans and they hang out perpendicular from the mobo. My old GTX295 weighed a ton. Almost any card will be secure as long as it is attached with the retaining screws.
Posted on Reply
#79
DaedalusHelios
phanbueyIf I was a board partner, I would come out with a 480GTX Hot'n'Heavy edition.

img.techpowerup.org/100303/geforce-gtx-280-07-03-08.jpg

^^ that would be sort of what my card design would look like. :cool:

Dont lie... you would buy one. I know im getting 2 :D
Nasty. You centered the image wrong on that mock up. I am glad it wasn't in "detail" on the cover you used.
Posted on Reply
#80
phanbuey
DaedalusHeliosNasty. You centered the image wrong on that mock up. I am glad it wasn't in "detail" on the cover you used.
I could get you one in detail :D.
Posted on Reply
#81
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
really doesn't look any different from any other nvidia design hopefully it proves me wrong but isn't this just a pair of GTX285's superglued together talking as one? kinda like the GTX285 is just a pair of G92's glued together
Posted on Reply
#82
a_ump
cdawallreally doesn't look any different from any other nvidia design hopefully it proves me wrong but isn't this just a pair of GTX285's superglued together talking as one? kinda like the GTX285 is just a pair of G92's glued together
whoa!!! lol where'd u get that idea. where u been cdawall? GF100(GTX 4XX series) is a new architecture, i can't explain everything but here's a link that should help u understand teh difference. I've never heard that the GT200 was G92's glued together either, i suppose it could be seen that way. HD 5XXX imo is closest you can get to previous GPU's glued together. Exactly double of everything.
Posted on Reply
#83
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
a_umpwhoa!!! lol where'd u get that idea. where u been cdawall? GF100(GTX 4XX series) is a new architecture, i can't explain everything but here's a link that should help u understand teh difference. I've never heard that the GT200 was G92's glued together either, i suppose it could be seen that way. HD 5XXX imo is closest you can get to previous GPU's glued together. Exactly double of everything.
Very true. Though, oddly enough, GT200 was just a beefed up G92(not two glued together, just beefed up), similar to RV770 being a beefed up RV670. This is why the G92 cards worked perfectly as mid-range parts to the GT200 parts, and really why nVidia did not need to make a new GPU to fill that role. Of course that lead to all the renaming BS...
Posted on Reply
#84
Csokis
Stalker: CoP Benchmark:

Posted on Reply
#85
InnocentCriminal
Resident Grammar Amender
I definitely want the Catalytic 10.3 driver set - f'ing awesome! Csokis, any chance of a link to the full article?
Posted on Reply
#87
InnocentCriminal
Resident Grammar Amender
Nicely done, maybe include the screenshot of the benchmark settings (this one) in your post so the results make more sense.
Posted on Reply
#88
Csokis
:rolleyes:
Only 4 partners will launch Fermi (this might be for Europe only) and XFX won't be one.
Cards won't ship until 1 or 2 weeks after launch. though partner availability in May will be quite bigger.

NV Hopes to get the speeds from the B1 chip that everyone is expecting from the launch chips. So we're a couple of months away from seeing the true GF100 performance.
Source: forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1404899&postcount=3138
Posted on Reply
#89
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
a_umpwhoa!!! lol where'd u get that idea. where u been cdawall? GF100(GTX 4XX series) is a new architecture, i can't explain everything but here's a link that should help u understand teh difference. I've never heard that the GT200 was G92's glued together either, i suppose it could be seen that way. HD 5XXX imo is closest you can get to previous GPU's glued together. Exactly double of everything.
its still the same design NV has been using since the ti4X00 series and like you both said GT200 was a beefed up G92 i just voted it was two glued together in effect thats what i see it as. until i see fermi on the street and it actually behaves differently that the current NV cards which are just bigger and bigger brothers to the last card i still think its just a bloated ti4200 with fancy gizmos attached

the slogan should be "fermi old tech with a fancy new cooler!"



ahh look its the original
Posted on Reply
#90
a_ump
cdawallits still the same design NV has been using since the ti4X00 series and like you both said GT200 was a beefed up G92 i just voted it was two glued together in effect thats what i see it as. until i see fermi on the street and it actually behaves differently that the current NV cards which are just bigger and bigger brothers to the last card i still think its just a bloated ti4200 with fancy gizmos attached

the slogan should be "fermi old tech with a fancy new cooler!"
um...i have to dissagree there cause G80 definitely brought a change in their design. had to of
Posted on Reply
#91
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
a_umpum...i have to dissagree there cause G80 definitely brought a change in their design. had to of
same basic design
Posted on Reply
#92
DaedalusHelios
cdawallsame basic design
PCB design perhaps, but the GPU tech is very different. Read whitepapers and you will see it is the evolution of GPU technology. Nvidia and ATi do it so what is your point? You do have one right? :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#93
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
DaedalusHeliosPCB design perhaps, but the GPU tech is very different. Read whitepapers and you will see it is the evolution of GPU technology. Nvidia and ATi do it so what is your point? You do have one right? :laugh:
no point whatsoever i'm just tired of waiting on a GPU that probably isn't going to be an improvement
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jul 31st, 2024 02:27 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts