Sunday, August 15th 2010

NVIDIA Reports Financial Results for Second Quarter Fiscal 2011

NVIDIA reported revenue of $811.2 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 ended Aug. 1, 2010, down 19.0 percent from the prior quarter and up 4.5 percent from $776.5 million from the same period a year earlier.

On a GAAP basis, the company recorded a net loss of $141.0 million, or $0.25 per share, compared with net income of $137.6 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, in the previous quarter and a net loss of $105.3 million, or $0.19 per share, in the same period a year earlier. GAAP gross margin was 16.6 percent compared with 45.6 percent in the previous quarter and 20.2 percent in the same period a year earlier.
Results were impacted by a large inventory write-down and a charge related to a weak die/packaging material set.

The inventory write-down was a consequence of weakened demand for consumer graphics processing units (GPUs) as higher memory prices and economic weakness in Europe and China led to a greater-than-expected shift to lower-priced GPUs and PCs with integrated graphics.

The weak die/packaging material set was used in certain versions of previous generation MCP (chipset) and GPU products shipped before July 2008 and used in notebook configurations. The charge, of $193.9 million, includes additional remediation costs, as well as the estimated costs of a pending settlement of a class action lawsuit consolidated in the District Court for the Northern District of California in April 2009 related to this same matter. The settlement is subject to certain approvals, including final approval by the court. Excluding this die/packaging material charge and the associated tax impact, non-GAAP net income was $20.1 million, or $0.03 per diluted share.

"Rapidly changing market conditions made for a challenging quarter," said Jen-Hsun Huang, NVIDIA's CEO and president. "We delivered excellent results in Quadro professional graphics, Tesla GPU computing, and our Tegra system-on-a-chip business. But our GeForce consumer business fell significantly short of expectations amid weak PC demand in Europe and China. Although demand among end-users remains uncertain, we expect to drive revenue and grow market share with new products that are gaining momentum in each of our businesses."

Outlook
The outlook for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 is as follows:
  • Revenue is expected to be up 3 to 5 percent from the second quarter.
  • GAAP gross margin is expected to increase to 46.5 to 47.5 percent.
  • GAAP operating expenses are expected to be approximately $300 million.
  • GAAP tax rate of 17 to 19 percent.
Second Quarter Fiscal 2011 Highlights:
  • NVIDIA launched and shipped the GeForce GTX 460, bringing the gaming benefits of the Fermi architecture to lower price points.
  • NVIDIA launched and shipped a range of Quadro products based on the Fermi architecture for workstation professionals.
  • NVIDIA extended its reach in supercomputing as IBM started offering products based on Tesla; these also use Fermi-generation GPUs.
For more information, please visit this page.
Add your own comment

26 Comments on NVIDIA Reports Financial Results for Second Quarter Fiscal 2011

#26
Benetanegia
AndreiDSemiaccurate might seem sometimes against NV but what they reported so far isn't far from the truth, in the end, you read what you want.
Hmm they are always against Nvidia and sometimes (i.e a few times) are right. My concern with them is that they do not do anything close to journalism, yet they pretend to be a news site. A news site has to be always right not just 50% of the times (how do you do it? easy, you actually have sources). It's easy to be right 50% of the time if you write like they do. i.e. "GF100 is going to be big (everyoe knows that), so it will consume a lot and be hot". Both things go hand in hand, so it either is hot or it isn't. They were right that time, BUT and it's a big "but" there, they said the same abut G80, GT200 and recently GF104. None of them was what they claimed to be. 25% accuracy right there. If you are not right 90%++ of the times and you are right just a little bit over 50% of the times (when you have a good day) what are you? Nothing, since throwing a coin is just as accurate as you are.
Anyway, it's not like the die size matters in any way for us the consumers, it just matters for the bottom line of the chip companies.
Yeah, but it does not matter nearly as much as many people claim it to be. And frankly most of those people just repeat what Charlie says in his editorials full of FUD and BS, which usually put GPU manufacturing costs at above $300 which is a total load of BS. In general, for high end cards the difference between a small chip and a big one is $25 at most, not a problem at all, specially when the bigger chip is faster and hence can be sold for more. That's without taking into account many other expenses, which in the case at hand Nvidia deals better with, like management. AMD is doing better right now, but it was a mess just a few year ago and isstill not at the level of most other IT companies on that department. For example, had Nvidia not have to pay 190 millions for the expensees derived from bad bumps in 2008, they would have been $50 millions in the black, more than AMD's graphics division (who apparently sells HD5000 cards like hot-cakes and a massive profits margin, but doesnt show on the finances). And that's without having the products to sell, except GF100 based cards which according to the same sources that are claiming GF104 to be 367 mm^2, are selling at a big loss. Erm can you tell me how can a company sell 400.000 cards at a loss and have a 50$ profit in a bad quarter?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 18th, 2024 09:39 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts