Thursday, September 26th 2013

Radeon R9 and Radeon R7 Graphics Cards Pictured Some More

Here's a quick recap of AMD's updated product stack, spread between the R9 and R7 series. This article can help you understand the new nomenclature. AMD's lineup begins with the Radeon R7 250 and Radeon R7 260X. The two are based on the 28 nm "Curacao" silicon, which is a variation of the "Pitcairn" silicon the previous-generation Radeon HD 7870 was based on. The R7 250 is expected to be priced around US $89, with 1 GB of RAM, and performance rated at over 2,000 points by 3DMark Firestrike benchmark. The R7 260X, features double the memory at 2 GB, higher clock speeds, possibly more number crunching resources, Firestrike score of over 3,700 points, and a pricing that's around $139. This card should turn up the heat against the likes of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.

Moving on, there's the $199 Radeon R9 270X. Based on a chip not much unlike "Tahiti LE," it features 2 GB of memory, and 3DMark Firestrike score of over 5,500 points. Then there's the Radeon R9 280X. This card, priced attractively at $299, is practically a rebrand of the Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition with. It features 3 GB of RAM, and over 6,800 points on 3DMark Firestrike. Then there are the R9 290 and R9 290X. AMD flew dozens of scribes thousands of miles over to Hawaii, and left them without an official announcement on the specifications of the two. From what AMD told us, the two feature 4 GB of memory, over 5,000 TFLOP/s compute power, and over 300 GB/s memory bandwidth. The cards we mentioned are pictured in that order below.

More pictures follow.

Radeon R7 250
Radeon R7 260X
Radeon R9 270X
Radeon R9 280X
Radeon R9 290
Radeon R9 290X
Add your own comment

77 Comments on Radeon R9 and Radeon R7 Graphics Cards Pictured Some More

#76
TheoneandonlyMrK
EarthDogWho the hell is buying a $400+ card to run on a monitor with only VGA inputs? If you can afford such a card, you better have a monitor with DVI on it, LOL!
dunno i just realised my new card has no hdmi.. dohhh I got a 7970 as they are tooo cheap damn it:o,, R9 will be out in 3 mins to smash my new card in :laugh::roll::cry:

yes fine ive a dvi monitor but i didnt wanna watch the footy on that:shadedshu
in short choice is goood
Posted on Reply
#77
leeb2013
btarunrUnless AMD's PowerPoint skills suck, R9 290X Firestrike is under 8000.

www.techpowerup.com/img/13-09-26/264a.jpg

Notice the top block (which ends at 8000) is fading at the top. GTX TITAN's Firestrike score is ranging between 8,200 and 8,700.
It's got me completely stumped too, but no-one else has even questioned it.

I can't understand it, how is a Firestrike score of 8000 good? My $200 7950 gets a graphics score of over 8000!!

www.3dmark.com/3dm/1299529
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jul 16th, 2024 10:16 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts