Monday, April 13th 2015

AMD "Zen" A Monolithic Core Design

AMD's upcoming "Zen" architecture will see a major change in the way the company designs its CPU cores. It will be a departure from the "module" core design introduced with "Bulldozer," in which two cores with shared resources constitute the indivisible unit of a multi-core processor. A "Zen" core will have dedicated resources in a way things used to be before "Bulldozer," and only the last-level cache (L3 cache), will be shared between cores. "Zen" will also implement SMT, much in the same way as Intel processors do, with HyperThreading Technology.

The first implementation of "Zen" will be an insanely powerful APU (on paper anyway), featuring 16 physical "Zen" CPU cores, 32 logical CPUs enabled with SMT, 512 KB dedicated L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU's ISA instruction set will see a spring-cleaning, with the removal of underused instruction-sets, and the introduction of new ones. Other features on this APU are equally surprising - a quad-channel DDR4 integrated memory controller, a separate HBM (high-bandwidth memory) controller dedicated to the integrated graphics, with up to 512 GB/s bandwidth, and an integrated graphics core featuring "Greenland-class" stream processors. Given that AMD is able to build 7-billion transistor GPUs on existing 28 nm processes, building an APU with these chops doesn't sound far-fetched. The company could still have to rely on a newer fab.
Source: FudZilla
Add your own comment

102 Comments on AMD "Zen" A Monolithic Core Design

#26
Captain_Tom
Musselsdont forget the rumours that DX12 allows sharing/adding of VRAM in multi GPU, that 16GB could be insane
OMG... I would upgrade from my i7-4770K in A SECOND if it meant the system RAM could just be that 16GB of HBM.
Posted on Reply
#27
Freedom4556
Not to get anybody's hopes dashed, but the instant I read "16 cores" and "current process" I immediately assumed we're looking at a game console/server-esque sub-2GHz bulk process affair. This just sounds like a double-sized, updated PS4 APU.
Posted on Reply
#28
Krekeris
Am I the only one here going to get one of these badboys to browse internet and watch youtube?
Posted on Reply
#29
GhostRyder
Wow, well on paper this sounds fantastic and like a real winner if they get their IPC up enough to compensate. The GPU portion could be a real winner on its own but if the CPU disappoints then its only good on the server market (Where VM's and such need just a bunch of cores instead of single powerful cores).

Not sure what I really think beyond it sounds great on paper though. It could really be a huge step up from them and I am sure it will be lots better than the previous gen CPU's, however it will come down to how much on a clock to clock ratio as to whether these things are just good or fantastic.
Posted on Reply
#30
DarkMantle
Caring1I thought it was pretty obvious where it was sourced from. I think your first sentence summed it up nicely.
Zen is a rumored architecture and anything printed is purely speculation for now.
Well it probably is for some people but not for everybody, just take a look at some of the comments. Most of other sites that are also reporting on this story do tell their readers these are rumors or could very well be a complete fabrication. I think it is important to say when a story is based on unconfirmed sources. That is all.
Posted on Reply
#31
librin.so.1
Freedom4556[...]I immediately assumed we're looking at a game console/server-esque sub-2GHz bulk process affair. This just sounds like a double-sized, updated PS4 APU.
The APU in PS4 (same goes for Xbone) is of the Jaguar µArch, which is AMD's low-power µArch currently being replaced by its rafinement – Puma.
Meanwhile, Zen is a new µArch – a completely new design.

So, it can't be, in any way, just one "beefy" updated Jaguar, i.e. Puma.
Posted on Reply
#32
Countryside
If everything goes well then AMD can say goodbye to Underdog status :toast:. If they fail it will be a sad day in cpu history.
Posted on Reply
#33
HalfAHertz
VinskaThe APU in PS4 (same goes for Xbone) is of the Jaguar µArch, which is AMD's low-power µArch currently being replaced by its rafinement – Puma.
Meanwhile, Zen is a new µArch – a completely new design.

So, it can't be, in any way, just one "beefy" updated Jaguar, i.e. Puma.
I completely agree. There is no way in hell they can manage to fit 16 beefy cores on one single die with the available production technology. This smells a lot like 16 tiny cores similar in performance to Puma/Atom. Or in the best case 16 medium sized cores similar in performance to Piledriver/Steamroller and clocked low to keep the heat to reasonable levels. This would pretty much make it useless for gaming/productivity tasks...
Posted on Reply
#34
RejZoR
Looks like I'll be having difficulty deciding between Skylake and Zen. It looks amazing on paper and it just might be a reason to go with AMD this time around. AMD's certainly have that "zen" feeling to them when you own them. :D
Posted on Reply
#35
micropage7
with many and many and many cores i think AMD should improve their per core performance, many cores is good but until now i think we miss the opportunity having many cores since only few cores that fully utilized except you do heavy task
Posted on Reply
#36
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
DarkMantleI'm a little confused. Why aren't you telling us in your article that this is just rumors based on a "leaked" slide Fudzilla got their hands on.
I linked to that article..
Posted on Reply
#37
Jorge
ChaitanyaI hope we see cpus without integrated gpu based on this architecture.
Yeah, it's called Zen. Zen is the CPU and it's cores are so good they are going in the next AMD APU iterations. Zen was developed to be a discrete CPU first and then the cores added to the next gen APUs.
Posted on Reply
#38
Jorge
DarkMantleI'm a little confused. Why aren't you telling us in your article that this is just rumors based on a "leaked" slide Fudzilla got their hands on.

I love AMD as much as the next guy and want them to be profitable but making people believe this is real based on rumors is just not good for the company (and coming from Fudzilla I have no doubt that could very well be part of the reason why they posted this). This could end up worse than the Bulldozer fiasco.
It's real and not based on rumors. The 16 core APUs are intended for enterprise, not consumers. Eight cores is more than enough for any consumer applications. SMT will help compensate for the poorly written code that exists.
Posted on Reply
#39
64K
micropage7with many and many and many cores i think AMD should improve their per core performance, many cores is good but until now i think we miss the opportunity having many cores since only few cores that fully utilized except you do heavy task
Well, from a gaming perspective more cores might turn out to be faster overall even if they are slower individually. One of the many promises of DX12 is that it will make better use of additional cores. We'll see.
Posted on Reply
#40
TRWOV
HMB controller along with a DDR4 one? So we'll see HBM sticks soon?

AMD should at least match Sandy Bridge's IPC this time, otherwise the same story will repeat... and please, don't call these "FX".
Posted on Reply
#41
MikeMurphy
This is a server chip guys. You think AMD would waste money giving consumers 16 cores?

They also look like jaguar derivatives.
Posted on Reply
#42
wiak
this looks interesting
Posted on Reply
#43
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
ChaitanyaI hope we see cpus without integrated gpu based on this architecture.
Not likely going to happen. Just like Intel, all AMD's CPUs will have integrated graphics. The most we can hope for is a CPU with the GPU portion disabled.
Posted on Reply
#44
Dent1
TRWOVAMD should at least match Sandy Bridge's IPC this time, otherwise the same story will repeat... and please, don't call these "FX".
You are talking from the point of view of a techie and enthusiast. not from a businessman or significant shareholder.

You want performance for your own selfish needs, which is fine, but don't pretend more performance will magically change the "story" without a strategic business plan.
Posted on Reply
#45
Petey Plane
MikeMurphyThis is a server chip guys. You think AMD would waste money giving consumers 16 cores?

They also look like jaguar derivatives.
HalfAHertzI completely agree. There is no way in hell they can manage to fit 16 beefy cores on one single die with the available production technology. This smells a lot like 16 tiny cores similar in performance to Puma/Atom. Or in the best case 16 medium sized cores similar in performance to Piledriver/Steamroller and clocked low to keep the heat to reasonable levels. This would pretty much make it useless for gaming/productivity tasks...
AMD been selling 16 core chips for at least 3 years already
Posted on Reply
#46
Captain_Tom
Petey PlaneAMD been selling 16 core chips for at least 3 years already
Exactly. Everyone seems to be forgetting this. 14nm will allow over double the density so I see no problem with them fitting all this stuff while improving IPC a ton.
Posted on Reply
#47
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
Petey PlaneAMD been selling 16 core chips for at least 3 years already
Captain_TomExactly. Everyone seems to be forgetting this. 14nm will allow over double the density so I see no problem with them fitting all this stuff while improving IPC a ton.
Yep, and they've been doing it on 32nm too...with 115w TDPs...
Posted on Reply
#49
TheinsanegamerN
I so hope zen is good. my 6300 is starting to show its age, and im trying to hold out. a zen cpu+microatx board+r9 390x sounds perfect.
Posted on Reply
#50
RealNeil
I remember the advertising hype just before Bulldozer came out.

AMD's Ad guys had everyone worked up into a frenzy with a lot of fantastic, dubious claims about its performance.
Then, It came out and everyone was underwhelmed and pissed off about it.
They took a huge PR hit then, and not long afterwards, they fired most of the Ad guys responsible.

I think that they learned from that and have toned down the rhetoric since then.

Me, I'm now cautious about new releases. I want to see reviews, and not just one of them either.
I want to read about other's experiences with brand new tech before I spend money getting into it.
I don't care if I'm the first one to have something anymore.

Zen ~sounds~ really good, but show me the reviews first.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 24th, 2024 08:22 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts