Monday, April 13th 2015

AMD "Zen" A Monolithic Core Design

AMD's upcoming "Zen" architecture will see a major change in the way the company designs its CPU cores. It will be a departure from the "module" core design introduced with "Bulldozer," in which two cores with shared resources constitute the indivisible unit of a multi-core processor. A "Zen" core will have dedicated resources in a way things used to be before "Bulldozer," and only the last-level cache (L3 cache), will be shared between cores. "Zen" will also implement SMT, much in the same way as Intel processors do, with HyperThreading Technology.

The first implementation of "Zen" will be an insanely powerful APU (on paper anyway), featuring 16 physical "Zen" CPU cores, 32 logical CPUs enabled with SMT, 512 KB dedicated L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU's ISA instruction set will see a spring-cleaning, with the removal of underused instruction-sets, and the introduction of new ones. Other features on this APU are equally surprising - a quad-channel DDR4 integrated memory controller, a separate HBM (high-bandwidth memory) controller dedicated to the integrated graphics, with up to 512 GB/s bandwidth, and an integrated graphics core featuring "Greenland-class" stream processors. Given that AMD is able to build 7-billion transistor GPUs on existing 28 nm processes, building an APU with these chops doesn't sound far-fetched. The company could still have to rely on a newer fab.
Source: FudZilla
Add your own comment

102 Comments on AMD "Zen" A Monolithic Core Design

#101
rruff
TheGuruStudAnd they need to be quiet.
It is quiet. Just tested it and I can't hear any difference between 1100 and 1700 rpm. Max temp with full load was 61C.
Posted on Reply
#102
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
rruffIf you keep it say 4 years, that $50+ isn't trivial compared to the cost of the CPU. Once you add a decent overclocking MB and a cooler and add the electric cost, you are definitely spending more on the FX. You are in i5 territory.
That is also assuming you leave your computer on 24/7, which most don't. If the computer runs 8 hours a day, which is more reasonable, the cost difference is only about $4.50 a year.

Motherboard wise, I'm spending about $100 either way I go. And I'm putting a better cooler on either one as well. Yeah, the stock cooler on the i3 is good enough to keep it from thermal throttling, but it in a warm room it gets loud and lets the temps get higher than I like.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 24th, 2024 08:38 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts