Friday, January 6th 2017
AMD Ryzen 8 Core/16 Thread CPU ES Now Run at 3.6 GHz base, 3.9 GHz Boost
The folks at hardwareluxx managed to get some quality alone time with AMD's Ryzen demonstration boot at CES 2017, and it has to be said they used their time well. They managed to bring up Windows' System page, as well as its Device Manager, which seemingly confirmed that the Ryzen sample at use, though an engineering sample it was, was set at 3.6 GHz base clock with the capability to boost up to 3.9 GHz on a whim - up 200 MHz from the base clock speed of the sample used at AMD's New Horizon Event, where even at those speeds, the chip was shown beating an 8 core, 16 thread i7 6900K. You can see those clocks at the below screenshot, where "1D3601A2M88F3_39/36_N" (the code for the engineering sample Ryzen chip) makes it clear this is an F3 stepping processor, with the 39 referring to the boost clock, and the 36 referring to its base clock.
This goes right into AMD's claims of 3.4 GHz being the lowest frequency a Ryzen consumer processor would carry. It seems AMD is quickly galloping towards the finish line here, and as Lisa Su said at the New Horizon presentation, Ryzen chips can only improve until their promised launch, with an already rumored F4 stepping of the processor carrying a rounded-up, 4 GHz boost clock.
Source:
Hardwareluxx.de
This goes right into AMD's claims of 3.4 GHz being the lowest frequency a Ryzen consumer processor would carry. It seems AMD is quickly galloping towards the finish line here, and as Lisa Su said at the New Horizon presentation, Ryzen chips can only improve until their promised launch, with an already rumored F4 stepping of the processor carrying a rounded-up, 4 GHz boost clock.
48 Comments on AMD Ryzen 8 Core/16 Thread CPU ES Now Run at 3.6 GHz base, 3.9 GHz Boost
Are
They
Going
To
Release
The
Damn
Thing
?
Too many people are expecting a sub 200-300 dollar 8C/16T cpu from AMD that will beat a 6900K. I think MANY will be disappointed again once again.
I'm certainly not going to jump on a CPU for 500+ dollar while my 4770K is still doing all it needs to do.
I also believe this only has 20 lanes? Not enough to enter the big boys league imo.
I myself don't really care about AMD but I am excited for folk who could finally get such a CPU at lower cost. In fact I am about to headed over to Overland Park Microcenter to pickup my i7 7700K.
It is vastly difficult for AMD to come back big time and tick all boxes in the desktop space. And the more hyped up people get the better they have to be.
Most likely is 20 from the CPU, with 4 additional from X370.