Monday, March 13th 2017
Hype Trains and You: A PSA
Hype Trains are bad. They are not just bad because a random frog on the internet told you so either, they are bad because they build upon themselves to the point that you would believe a random frog on the internet if he said something beneficial about your chosen product.
It's not just technology either. It can happen in politics, religion, whatever. But they are bad, and not to be trusted. They aren't just bad for humanity and all that, they are bad for the products they represent. Yes, they actually hurt what they are hyping. Ryzen didn't benefit from the hypetrain anymore than Trump benefited from the "Trump Train." Allow me to explain (and please, put the foam back in your mouth for me uttering "Trump" in a tech article. That's the only time I promise).Bottom line is, hype trains take everything good and compound it, true or not. This raises expectations into the stratosphere and make them impossible to satisfy. Once the product, candidate, or what have you is brought into general existence, it will never satisfy what it has been built up to be. This leads to disappointment. Disappointment will not help sales long-term, nor ensure a safe re-election for a politician. The higher the hype, the bigger the disappointment.
I remember a game I was really hyped for circa 2003 or so. GolemLabs premier geopolitical simulator "Superpower 2." It was a game that let you control any nation on earth in modern times. It also got hyped on its own forums into the stratosphere, and guess what? When I got it, I thought it sucked really hardcore… only it didn't. Most critics ranked it as somewhat novel and mediocre, but to me, it was utter and complete garbage because I couldn't do everything they promised me on the forums, things that likely were never even on the drawing board, let alone ever implemented.
I'm still stung from that hype train. The only way a hype train can work honestly is if it is sustained by an outside force. The political example of this would be Robert Mugabe (have some Wikipedia fun there), President-until-I-say-otherwise of Zimbabwe. The interesting thing about Mugabe by the way, is his hype train is still going in elements of his country, despite him mismanaging its economy to the point he literally added 0's to his bills to "control inflation."
So, don't be an idiot, don't vote for Mugabe, and for god sake man get off that hype train before it kills all our realistic expectations. You aren't helping anyone.
EDIT: Thanks to Kerbel Space Program for the Hype Train in space image.
It's not just technology either. It can happen in politics, religion, whatever. But they are bad, and not to be trusted. They aren't just bad for humanity and all that, they are bad for the products they represent. Yes, they actually hurt what they are hyping. Ryzen didn't benefit from the hypetrain anymore than Trump benefited from the "Trump Train." Allow me to explain (and please, put the foam back in your mouth for me uttering "Trump" in a tech article. That's the only time I promise).Bottom line is, hype trains take everything good and compound it, true or not. This raises expectations into the stratosphere and make them impossible to satisfy. Once the product, candidate, or what have you is brought into general existence, it will never satisfy what it has been built up to be. This leads to disappointment. Disappointment will not help sales long-term, nor ensure a safe re-election for a politician. The higher the hype, the bigger the disappointment.
I remember a game I was really hyped for circa 2003 or so. GolemLabs premier geopolitical simulator "Superpower 2." It was a game that let you control any nation on earth in modern times. It also got hyped on its own forums into the stratosphere, and guess what? When I got it, I thought it sucked really hardcore… only it didn't. Most critics ranked it as somewhat novel and mediocre, but to me, it was utter and complete garbage because I couldn't do everything they promised me on the forums, things that likely were never even on the drawing board, let alone ever implemented.
I'm still stung from that hype train. The only way a hype train can work honestly is if it is sustained by an outside force. The political example of this would be Robert Mugabe (have some Wikipedia fun there), President-until-I-say-otherwise of Zimbabwe. The interesting thing about Mugabe by the way, is his hype train is still going in elements of his country, despite him mismanaging its economy to the point he literally added 0's to his bills to "control inflation."
So, don't be an idiot, don't vote for Mugabe, and for god sake man get off that hype train before it kills all our realistic expectations. You aren't helping anyone.
EDIT: Thanks to Kerbel Space Program for the Hype Train in space image.
74 Comments on Hype Trains and You: A PSA
Holy shit.
GEMINI? REALLY? LOL
And same goes for RX480. People whining over it's power consumption and blablabla. It's a card that goes against GTX 980 and matches R9 390(X). With half the bus width and less of everything. It consumes WAY less power than R9 390(X) and a bit less than GTX 980. And with 2 times lower price. Sounds reasonable to me.
As for Vega, considering how it's performing in leaks you can get a rough idea and how much of new tech they crammed into the core compared to what Polaris received, it's reasonable to assume it'll perform good. I mean, R9 Fury X, despite its age performs really well even by today's standards. Now shrink Fury to a smaller node, add it all new pixel and vertex engine, tiled rendering, improved compression and HBM2 that basically has access to unlimited memory outside graphic card. It may not be the king of the hill this moment, but something tells me this capability will give Vega a longevity R9 Fury X never had because of the 4GB VRAM limit. Because Fury X still has quite some grunt as far as pushing pixels goes even today. And in DX11 games, but it's the memory that's gimping it rather badly.
*walks away*
Also note I wrote far more about Mugabe than Trump. Good god no. I'm the frog. It's my avatar on the forums. Where is my "100% efficiency IMC?" Where is my 5Ghz overclock on water/good air?
Sorry, not seeing it personally. I was told from various individuals throughout here and elsewhere we'd have these things.
It IS a good product. But it could never meet the demands of the hype train. There isn't anything I know of that can. It's also bad for everyone, including the instigators who think they are helping. AMD, Trump, Obama, none of them benefit from this. You try to say I'm playing it political, but I'm really not, I'm only pointing out how it applies to politics. The issue is bipartisan.
Mugabe was thrown in because he is the exception and did benefit (at least, within his own nation), but then, he used military force to hold power. Doesn't really apply to anything in the tech realm, admittedly, or most functional democracies. I think I included him basically to show the only way it can ever work, and it isn't pretty.
I believe, I might be wrong, that posting in threads shouldn't be confused with news posting in the main page. Even if it is for the good of mankind.
To our credit, there are many more news threads today (although only two came from me, admittedly).
Or I was confusing this and reddit. Could've happened, I guess. But I don't think so.
As for the two "let's talk about hype" articles. I guess two articles pay better than one in the end of the month. And while this makes sense in the news category, because some times, big news articles with too much information, end up getting mostly ignored and with less replies, when we are talking about editorials, it is better not to flood the main page. Again, my opinion and nothing more.
In complete seriousness, editorials probably are something I'm going to be taking a break from for now anyways, so it's all good. News will flow soon and factual stuff will wipe away the hypetrains.
PS: I get paid by the hour, not the article. Some days, I don't even post and get paid just for trying to dig. Oh god, we can agree on that. ;)
I THOUGHT @CAPSLOCKSTUCK MADE THE NEWS TEAM WITH A STORY ABOUT THE MUSK HYPERTRAIN
then i was derailed by a frog on a semi rant
Also I don't know why this is on the front page. This seems more like a post deep in the user forum. I don't like this new TPU.
VOTE MUGABE
It's always disappointing.
It's not the companies themselfes who hype, it's users..... if the company consistently release stuff (Nvidia) then hype is less.
GTX1080 received quite a lot of hype,was the worst disappointment of this gen if you ask me
Super expensive midrange design overpriced last gen performance...
GTX1080 TI received little hype but was a great product..
I just don't understand.
Ryzen is the only late release that received Hype that actually lived up to it, maybe not specifically for gamers but no-one can take away the 319 $ pricetag for 8/16 cpu that can take on a 6800K in almost anything...
No matter how good it would be, people would complain anyways, it would have too high expectations.