Friday, July 7th 2017

Cryptocurrency Mining Consumes More Power Than 17M Population Country

So, yes, the headline is accurate. We all know that cryptocurrency mining has now reached an all time high, which has affected availability and pricing of most graphics cards from both AMD and NVIDIA. Who doesn't want to make a quick buck here and there? So long as it's profitable, right?

Well, that kind of thinking has already brought the global mining power consumption to unprecedented levels (some might also say demented.) The two top cryptocurrencies right now (by market-cap), Bitcoin and Ethereum, are each responsible for 14.54 TWh and 4.69 TWh power consumption figures. As of now, Ethereum consumes almost as much power as the 120th most power-consuming country, Moldova, which has a population of around 3 million. Bitcoin, on the other hand, stands at 81st on the list, in-between Mozambique and Turkmenistan, the latter of which has a population estimated at 5.17 million people. Combined, Ethereum and Bitcoin consume more power than Syria, which had an estimated 2014 population above 17 million.
Ethereum mining consumes more than 8x the power it takes to run the entire VISA network, while Bitcoin consumes almost 27x as much (this shows how much more efficient centralized systems are. This is the cost of transparency and doing away with the trusted third party.) Cryptocurrencies and the blockchain technology in general have come to stay, and they will change the world (I am a staunch believer in that myself.) However, this goes to show that the current Proof of Work (PoW) design is unfeasible in the long-run - especially if blockchain technology does want to achieve a global scale. Proof of Stake anyone?
Sources: Digiconomist, ETeknix, Moldova Wiki, Turkmenistan Wiki
Add your own comment

101 Comments on Cryptocurrency Mining Consumes More Power Than 17M Population Country

#101
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
notbSo this is once again an issue with cheques. :-D
I just used that as example. Most transactions are processed by an ACH.
notbBut this will only be possible to check from inside your bank and by a limited group of employees. It's exactly the same today.
Indeed and enforced because there's only one database and it is secure. The whole point of blockchains is to eliminate the need for mainframes. Financial transactions, for regulatory, accountability, safety, privacy, and security reasons, can't be distributed.
notbwww.coindesk.com/goldman-sachs-leaves-r3cev/
"According to The Wall Street Journal, the bank has left the group, but notably intends to continue developing blockchain projects on its own. (Goldman Sachs is an investor in blockchain technology startups Circle and Digital Asset Holdings)."
Doesn't mean they'll come up with anything viable. As I said long ago, there's prototyping going on. Doesn't mean it will ever be broadly implemented.

Blockchains make more sense for public projects like wikis. Those that want the project to continue to be available can donate hardware/electricity to keeping it running.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 24th, 2024 02:44 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts