Wednesday, October 11th 2017

Optane 900P SSD, Successor to the Intel 750 Series

"Industry contacts" have told TweakTown that a successor to Intel's well received 750 series NVMe drives will launch within weeks. The second generation Optane 900P SSDs will be available in both the U.2 and AIC (PCI-E 3.0) form factors, with capacities of 280, 480, 960 and 1500 GBs. Like the Intel 750 series, the Optane 900P has enterprise roots, namely Intel's ridiculously expensive 375GB P4800X; which we covered earlier. As the 900P is aimed at consumers, maybe more accurately prosumers, prices should be "affordable".

Slide courtesy of TweakTown

Optane 900p
  • (Rumored) Sequential read/write speeds 2.5/2 GB/s
  • (Rumored) Random IOPS read/write 550,000/500,000
If accurate, the sequential write and random IOPS write speeds of the Optane 900p are substantially higher than the Intel 750 series, whose performance varied with drive capacity. It is also unconfirmed at this point, but the 900p might be compatible with AMD X399 motherboards, given that some motherboard manufactures have included a U.2 connector.
Source: TweakTown
Add your own comment

31 Comments on Optane 900P SSD, Successor to the Intel 750 Series

#26
Hood
I like the idea, but as an owner of a 400Gb Intel 750 AIC, I already have decent speeds and low latency, and I doubt I'd notice the difference. The 750 is so rock-solid and reliable, it's not wearing out anytime soon, but when it does, I will definitely be looking at Intel's latest, whatever it is at that time.
Posted on Reply
#27
Camm
Being honest, probably more interested in new NAND hitting market from Samsung. Affordable 2TB, or a chunky 4TB m.2. drive might finally solve my storage issues since I'm sans drives these days.
Posted on Reply
#28
Blueberries
If history repeats itself this will be the new latency king for desktop computing and Samsung will release a competitive 10 series (980?) shortly after.
Posted on Reply
#29
jabbadap
RejZoROr you can set it up as a hybrid caching solution using software (like PrimoCache). Intel chipset is only needed when trying to use official RST support. Then again, doing it using normal SSD and PimoCache would yield nearly the same results for less money and with larger SSD cache...
Well yeah. I haven't use windows since 2005, but that PrimoCache seems to be like bcache on linux. So, true there's quite little new on optane memory system by itself, though it should be more durable to that task than nand flash.
Posted on Reply
#30
RejZoR
Main benefit of Optane is much higher write durability (write cycles) and latency which is somewhere between RAM and SSD.
Posted on Reply
#31
bug
RejZoRMain benefit of Optane is much higher write durability (write cycles) and latency which is somewhere between RAM and SSD.
Lower latency is welcome, but what about the write cycles? I mean, every review of a TLC SSD out there tells us 1000p/e cycles is plenty for home usage, so do we want to spend extra for more cycles?
Ok, I know this is not targeted for home usage, but I wonder what reviews will say when Optane reaches this segment.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 20th, 2024 01:15 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts