Friday, January 12th 2018

Intel Releases CPU Benchmarks with Meltdown and Spectre Mitigations

It's safe to say that there's one thing that you don't mess around with, and that's performance. Enthusiasts don't spend hundreds of dollars on a processor to watch it underperform. Given the complicated nature of the Meltdown and Spectre vulnerabilities, Microsoft's so-called mitigations were bound to have an impact on processor performance. The million dollar question was: Just how much? The initial estimate was somewhere around 30%, but Intel, being optimistic as usual, expected the performance impact to be insignificant for the average user. They recently provided some preliminary benchmark results that looked quite convincing too. Well, let's take a look at their findings, shall we?

Intel measured the mitgations' impact on CPU performance using their 6th, 7th, and 8th Generation Intel Core processors but, more specifically, the i7-6700K, i7-7920HQ, i7-8650U, and i7-8700K. The preferred operating system used in the majority of the benchmarks was Windows 10, however, Windows 7 also made a brief appearance. Intel chose four key benchmarks for their testing. SYSmark 2014 SE evaluated CPU performance on an enterprise level simulating office productivity, data and financial analysis, and media creation. PC Mark 10, on the other hand, tested performance in real-world usage employing different workloads like web browsing, video conferencing, application start-up time, spreadsheets, writing, and digital content creation. 3DMark Sky Diver assessed CPU performance in a DirectX 11 gaming scenario. Lastly, WebXPRT 2015 measured system performance using six HTML5- and JavaScript-based workloads which include photo enhancement, organize album, stock option pricing, local notes, sales graphs, and explore DNA sequencing.
The SYSmark 2014 SE overall results showed a moderate decrease in CPU performance between 6% to 8% with the i7-6700K the being the most affected. System responsiveness took the biggest hit with performance dropping up to 21% on the i7-6700K. The Responsiveness scenario tested activities like application launches, application installation, web browsing with many tabs open, file copies, photo manipulation, and multi-tasking - all of which are heavily influenced by the type of storage. So, don't let that i7-6700K with the hard drive result fool you. PCMark 10 registered penalties in the range of 3% to 4% with the i7-7920HQ being least affected. We weren't surprised to see that the mitigations didn't affect gaming performance in 3DMark Sky Diver, since we had already done our own tests in 21 different games. Results from WebXPRT 2015 reveal performance drops between 5% to 10%.
Add your own comment

56 Comments on Intel Releases CPU Benchmarks with Meltdown and Spectre Mitigations

#51
Parn
21% less responsive for Skylakes. That's definitely noticeable. Cr*p.
Posted on Reply
#52
Katanai
AssimilatorAren't you the badass. Betting your next post will be "OMG my pc got exploited because of meltdown intel is teh evil no of course it's not my fault that i didn't install the mitigation because i'm a moron".
The only moron here is you. There are no known exploits for this vulnerability so the only thing you get from installing this patch right now is degraded performance, nothing more, nothing less. If you chose to willfully install a piece of software that reduces the performance of your CPU and offers no security benefit as there is nothing out there that it could stop, then that is your choice and I respect it as moronic as it might be. Please let me chose what I install on my PC, as I have been doing for many years with good results, without calling me any names.
Posted on Reply
#53
R-T-B
KatanaiThere are no known exploits for this vulnerability
People keep saying this. That's almost certainly not true anymore given open source expoit examples have been published. The world moves fast.

No one here is a moron. Not installing these updates is foolish in most instances however.
Posted on Reply
#54
Katanai
R-T-BPeople keep saying this. That's almost certainly not true anymore given open source expoit examples have been published. The world moves fast.

No one here is a moron. Not installing these updates is foolish in most instances however.
Foolish because of what? The things you imagine might be true, the things that could have been invented, the color of the sun as it sets down over the ocean? In the real world this update makes your CPU slower, this is a fact backed up with real data, not emotion and fairy tales. Another cold fact is that there isn't one documented instance in which this vulnerability has been used to take over a system without prior consent of the owner or in any other way that was not just a test. So where is the threat, aside from your own imagination, where is real data? I have seen people work for weeks at a time, to get 5% more processing power from their CPU with overclocking, wasting time to do numerous tests and tweaking and here you are calling me foolish because I don't want to install a piece of software that can degrade my CPU performance with as much as 30% because something, somewhere, while floating over the rainbow, in certain circumstances could somehow use this to infect my computer...
Posted on Reply
#55
bug
KatanaiFoolish because of what? The things you imagine might be true, the things that could have been invented, the color of the sun as it sets down over the ocean? In the real world this update makes your CPU slower, this is a fact backed up with real data, not emotion and fairy tales. Another cold fact is that there isn't one documented instance in which this vulnerability has been used to take over a system without prior consent of the owner or in any other way that was not just a test. So where is the threat, aside from your own imagination, where is real data? I have seen people work for weeks at a time, to get 5% more processing power from their CPU with overclocking, wasting time to do numerous tests and tweaking and here you are calling me foolish because I don't want to install a piece of software that can degrade my CPU performance with as much as 30% because something, somewhere, while floating over the rainbow, in certain circumstances could somehow use this to infect my computer...
The piece that you're missing is there is no documented attack till now, because the vulnerability itself has been undisclosed. Now that the cat's out of the bag, any unpatched system becomes fair game.
Sure, this isn't something a script kiddie could exploit, that much is true.
Posted on Reply
#56
cyneater
ShurikNWhat about VM testing. Since that is where the hit is presumably the largest
Really really bad.

This is just Moores law.

The chipmakers "knew"

Looks like google knew before the makers..

Now with everything at all time high.
Some thing big will happen force people to buy new.
Run the latest tech fork out a mint.

Its all about "More" for the companies to make "More" profit.

Is Itanium effected?
And powerpc?

I so I am amazed intel isnt flogged a dead horse IItanium. Then again this would piss off most of there other users and admit fault.
and IBM hasn't ramped up there advertising

Wasn't Microsoft going to Arm severs?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Feb 18th, 2025 02:41 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts