Thursday, March 8th 2018
Curious-looking Core i7-8670 Rears its Head
A curious-looking "Core i7-8670" processor surfaced on GFXBench benchmark online database, which features Intel UHD 630 iGPU. The processor's name breaks Intel's naming conventions of reserving the 87xx model number for Core i7 MSDT (mainstream desktop) SKUs, and 86xx for Core i5 SKUs, based on the 8th generation "Coffee Lake" silicon. The GFXBench information tab confirms that this is a 12-thread (6-core + HTT) CPU, and that its nominal clock speed is a mere 3.10 GHz. Its iGPU offers almost the same performance as the UHD 630 iGPU of the Core i7-8700.
Source:
GFXBench Online Database
10 Comments on Curious-looking Core i7-8670 Rears its Head
oh well the 2600X will be awesome then ...
correction since it's Intel ...
8600K 300ish $, 8700K 400ish $ and hypotetical 8670 350ish $ oh wait it's a non K, mmhhh probably an OEM/assembler SKU only
although the difference between a 8700K and 8700 is only 59.27$ for me ... then 350ish is probably spot on :laugh: (okay okay, i usually pay my hardware way more than the rest of the world where the fabled "MSRP" is not a unicorn .... GPU are a bad example due to mining craze .... but before that trend did hit the 10XX series i paid my 1070 around 150$ more than MSRP :laugh: and it was one of the cheapest model :) )
oohhh that would also make sense, except the change of nomenclature although ... 8700T would've been easier to understand
OEM or LP mmmmmmhhh :ohwell:
Just curious if something like that would be possible, I have no idea about manufacturing techniques, just wondering haha
trog
- Core i7-8700K (6-core/12-thread, 3.7GHz-4.7GHz, 12MB)—$340
- Core i7-8700 (6-core/12-thread, 3.2GHz-4.1GHz, 12MB)—$310
- Core i7-8670 (6-core/12-thread, 3.1GHz-?, 12MB)—???
- Core i5-8600K (6-core/6-thread, 3.6GHz-4.3GHz, 9MB)—$240
- Core i5-8400 (6-core/6-thread, 2.8GHz-4GHz, 9MB)—$182
~$280 is fine; any gamer would take an unlock 6/6 over a locked 6/12. there is like zero games that need >6. considering how long it took to go >2 then >4, there is plenty of time.