Monday, May 4th 2020

Intel 10th Gen Core "Comet Lake" Desktop Processor CPUID, TDP, and cTDP Revealed

May 4th, 2020 07:40 Discuss (27 Comments)

Internal documents of Intel's 10th generation Core "Comet Lake" processor family, leaked by momomo_us, reveal the CPUID, TDP, and configurable-TDP values of the various desktop SKUs. Intel broadly classifies Comet Lake by core-count and companion iGPU tier. The 10-core Comet Lake die ships with 125 W, 65 W, and 35 W TDP, for the K/KF, locked, and T-SKUs, respectively.

For the desktop Comet Lake-S, there are only two iGPU tiers, GT2 (iGPU present in UHD 630 flavor), or completely disabled (denoted as GT0). The charts detailing the non-Turbo clock speeds reveal that the presence or absence of iGPU has no impact on TDP, cTDP, or CPU frequencies. The "Comet Lake" 10-core + GT2 silicon is listed with a CPUID of A0655h, while the 6-core + GT2 and 4-core + GT2 variants share the A0653h CPUID.

Source: momomo_us

Add your own comment

27 Comments on Intel 10th Gen Core "Comet Lake" Desktop Processor CPUID, TDP, and cTDP Revealed

Shatun_Bear

14nm in 2020 is a really dire state of affairs for Intel. These are based off 2015's Skylake, higher frequencies, massive power draw and heat, and two more cores at the top.

TheoneandonlyMrK

Shatun_Bear14nm in 2020 is a really dire state of affairs for Intel. These are based off 2015's Skylake, higher frequencies, massive power draw and heat, and two more cores at the top.

But surely not it says 125 watts max :mad::shadedshu::laugh::roll::roll::roll::mad:

I can't believe the Tdp and Ctdp which in themselves are total nonesense equals a news piece on it's own , it's Brazen Bs that I ,if I were intel would have buried in the footnotes.

freeagent

So is that 125w just sitting there, and 275w loaded?

:laugh:

bug

freeagentSo is that 125w just sitting there, and 275w loaded?

:laugh:

As usual, it's 125W for base frequencies. Turbo Boost can draw up to 250W, if available and thermally possible.

TheoneandonlyMrK

bugAs usual, it's 125W for base frequencies. Turbo Boost can draw up to 250W, if available and thermally possible.

And as usual that number appears on nothing a typical customer might see.

Fourstaff

theoneandonlymrkAnd as usual that number appears on nothing a typical customer might see.

You can turn off Turbo Boost with ThrottleStop to stick within 125w, but typical customer will not use ThrottleStop.

ratirt

More information about the "hot lake". The power draw does give something to think about. 250W turbo and if you OC, I don't even wanna know. This one CPU draws more power than an entire decent graphics card.

bencrutz

bugAs usual, it's 125W for base frequencies. Turbo Boost can draw up to 250W, if available and thermally possible.

which usually dictated by the motherboard vendors, I think they will push it indefinitely and will only be limited by the thermals, so the motherboard will look good on benchmarks.

bug

bencrutzwhich usually dictated by the motherboard vendors, I think they will push it indefinitely and will only be limited by the thermals, so the motherboard will look good on benchmarks.

Is that a bad thing, while there's untapped potential in the silicone?
And if you worry about thermals, a locked CPU coupled with an H chipset will keep in the 65W ballpark anyway.

#10

TheoneandonlyMrK

FourstaffYou can turn off Turbo Boost with ThrottleStop to stick within 125w, but typical customer will not use ThrottleStop.

Few buy something that states upto 5ghz then do anything that stops that working, at least till the dust bunnies wreak their vengeance ,then they will all be here trying to get throttle stop to stop it down clocking and ruining fornite not the opposite ,often.

It's very disingenuous. Borderline dubious, well it's worse than that IMHO.

#11

bug

theoneandonlymrkAnd as usual that number appears on nothing a typical customer might see.

A lot of the stuff in the tech sheets appears on "nothing a typical customer might see". But the tech sheets are still available ;)

#12

TheoneandonlyMrK

bugA lot of the stuff in the tech sheets appears on "nothing a typical customer might see". But the tech sheets are still available ;)

See the Op's tech sheet's posted above, Even the tech wise have to dig way too deep.

You would think Pl2 was a dirty word.

#13

Metroid

125w idle and full load 500w, that I can agree.

#14

bug

theoneandonlymrkSee the Op's tech sheet's posted above, Even the tech wise have to dig way too deep.

And yet here we are, all aware and discussing the issue ;)

#15

Turmania

I will wait for the reviews, i do not think it will be worser then their 9th gen parts in power consumption as people here make it out to be. I will specifically look into i5 10600k and compare that with i5 9600k and ryzen5 3600x.

#16

TheoneandonlyMrK

bugAnd yet here we are, all aware and discussing the issue ;)

Yes tech enthusiasts on a tech forum a true source of info for noob pcmr.

Shouldn't take our kind to inform.

#17

ppn

TurmaniaI will wait for the reviews, i do not think it will be worser then their 9th gen parts in power consumption as people here make it out to be. I will specifically look into i5 10600k and compare that with i5 9600k and ryzen5 3600x.

I5 10600 compares to I7 8700K, $100 cheaper, +100Mhz more. And now with thinned die, cooler.

Of course people make it out to be worse, look at 3700X 140 watts vs 157 watt, 9900K. It's laughable a 14 watts difference.

9900K drops to 4.4Ghz to fit in 95 watts +14 watts more power than 3700X 4.2Ghz, if it were 4.2Ghz vs 4.2Ghz it would be 140 watts vs 140 watts.

The only reason they are pushing 125+ watts now is because of the 4.9Ghz mark.

Obviously when voltage is raised power is raised to the power of 3, for 10% overclock, 1.1*1.1*1.1 you get 33% more power.

If AMD could do this their TDP will also jump by the same 33%, that is all.

#18

ARF

ppnI5 10600 compares to I7 8700K, $100 cheaper, +100Mhz more. And now with thinned die, cooler.

Of course people make it out to be worse, look at 3700X 140 watts vs 157 watt, 9900K. It's laughable a 14 watts difference.

9900K drops to 4.4Ghz to fit in 95 watts +14 watts more power than 3700X 4.2Ghz, if it were 4.2Ghz vs 4.2Ghz it would be 140 watts vs 140 watts.

The only reason they are pushing 125+ watts now is because of the 4.9Ghz mark.

Obviously when voltage is raised power is raised to the power of 3, for 10% overclock, 1.1*1.1*1.1 you get 33% more power.

If AMD could do this their TDP will also jump by the same 33%, that is all.

But that additional power draw on the Ryzen systems comes from two things:
1. Power hog Infinity Fabric which has been fixed in Renoir;
2. X570 chipset raised power draw.

Those figures are not CPU to CPU straight comparisons.

#19

ppn

renoir has to drop to 100 total system power to even make sense, because I believe I7 10700 +motherboard with the right VRMs can do 120 with some undervolting 4.200 @ 1 volt.

#20

kapone32

ppnI5 10600 compares to I7 8700K, $100 cheaper, +100Mhz more. And now with thinned die, cooler.

Of course people make it out to be worse, look at 3700X 140 watts vs 157 watt, 9900K. It's laughable a 14 watts difference.

9900K drops to 4.4Ghz to fit in 95 watts +14 watts more power than 3700X 4.2Ghz, if it were 4.2Ghz vs 4.2Ghz it would be 140 watts vs 140 watts.

The only reason they are pushing 125+ watts now is because of the 4.9Ghz mark.

The fact that I think it will be much more than 125 watts is more due to the Z490 VRM array on most boards being much closer to Threadripper or X299 in terms of how they are built. There is no way you would put that much power delivery on a board if you don't have to. Some boards have 12+ 90 Amp power stages. Just look at a difference between the VRMs on Z490 vs Z390.

#21

bug

theoneandonlymrkYes tech enthusiasts on a tech forum a true source of info for noob pcmr.

Shouldn't take our kind to inform.

Who else do you think cares about this anyway?
And yes, my less informed friends ask me before building a new PC.

#22

TheoneandonlyMrK

bugWho else do you think cares about this anyway?
And yes, my less informed friends ask me before building a new PC.

why is it all or nothing with your type.

who said everyone cares, your saying, sorry implying no one cares, it is obviously somewhere between, just like not everyone has a helpful friend like you.

if no one really cared the likes of tesla wouldn't be going well, perspective, there is more than one.

#23

bug

theoneandonlymrkwhy is it all or nothing with your type.

who said everyone cares, your saying, sorry implying no one cares, it is obviously somewhere between, just like not everyone has a helpful friend like you.

if no one really cared the likes of tesla wouldn't be going well, perspective, there is more than one.

Well, it's not all or nothing.
People imply that because Intel doesn't print all fine detail on the box, they're somehow misleading customers.
When I point out the info is actually available, you cry "but average Joe doesn't know how to get it".
All I said is average Joe probably doesn't even care about that. They're probably not going to buy the unlocked parts anyway.

Basically it's people implying there's a problem before there's as much as a hint of a problem in the real world. Kinda annoying for me.

#24

freeagent

Well, if your rig pulled 200 at the wall just sitting there at the desktop, you would care. Then load up the cpu with something redonkulous Like linpack xtreme and watch that 200w turn into 400w. It’s not easy to cool something like that, especially quietly. I’m talking about my old x5690 that I recently started using again. Compared to my 3770K it has no respect for the environment lol.

#25

unclewebb

ThrottleStop & RealTemp Author

@btarunr - Thanks for the info.

I was recently helping a user with his new Comet Lake Core i7-10750H laptop.
www.amazon.com/MSI-Stealth-10SF-036-i7-10750H-Win10PRO/dp/B085B2Y58T

While running Cinebench R20, check out the beastly power consumption. AVG TEMP throttling kicks in almost immediately.
So much for the Intel 45W TDP spec. A peak of 94.2W is getting kind of crazy for a laptop.

His CPU was pegged at 95°C for the entire run.

DATE TIME MULTI C0% CKMOD CHIPM BAT_mW TEMP NVIDIA GPU VID POWER
2020-05-02 15:28:44 44.00 9.0 100.0 100.0 0 69 300 35 1.2875 23.1
2020-05-02 15:28:45 44.89 15.2 100.0 100.0 0 61 300 35 1.3280 35.1
2020-05-02 15:28:46 44.75 23.2 100.0 100.0 0 58 300 35 1.2797 40.3
2020-05-02 15:28:47 44.96 24.7 100.0 100.0 0 81 300 35 1.3289 42.1
2020-05-02 15:28:48 43.29 80.5 100.0 100.0 0 93 300 35 1.2114 69.2
2020-05-02 15:28:49 43.94 42.7 100.0 100.0 0 73 300 35 1.2688 56.6
2020-05-02 15:28:50 42.45 99.2 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 35 1.1443 91.2 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:28:51 41.67 94.4 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 35 1.1760 93.6 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:28:52 40.86 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 35 1.1776 94.2 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:28:53 40.60 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 35 1.1466 92.0 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:28:54 40.70 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 36 1.1528 93.0 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:28:55 40.41 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 36 1.1487 90.1 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:28:56 40.14 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 36 1.1476 88.6 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:28:57 40.06 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 36 1.1478 87.3 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:28:58 39.83 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 37 1.1167 85.8 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:28:59 39.67 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 37 1.1469 84.4 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:00 39.63 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 37 1.1162 84.6 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:01 39.32 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 37 1.1481 82.1 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:02 39.24 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 38 1.1180 81.8 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:03 39.19 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 38 1.1179 80.6 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:04 39.06 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 38 1.1180 79.8 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:05 38.84 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 38 1.1185 78.3 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:06 38.84 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 38 1.1171 78.2 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:07 38.67 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 38 1.1166 77.2 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:08 38.50 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 39 1.1178 75.9 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:09 38.41 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 39 1.0872 75.8 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:10 38.19 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 39 1.0867 74.2 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:11 38.22 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 39 1.0887 74.3 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:12 38.21 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 39 1.0863 73.9 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:13 38.05 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 39 1.0861 73.3 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:14 37.98 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 39 1.0861 73.1 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:15 38.22 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 39 1.0876 74.3 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:16 38.13 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 40 1.0881 73.3 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:17 38.02 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 40 1.0862 72.8 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:18 38.04 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 40 1.0566 72.7 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:19 37.93 100.0 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 40 1.0868 71.6 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:20 37.82 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 40 1.0878 71.0 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:21 37.84 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 40 1.0576 71.1 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:22 37.52 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 40 1.0570 69.8 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:23 37.59 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 40 1.0874 69.2 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:24 37.43 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 40 1.0568 68.9 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:25 37.53 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 40 1.0873 69.4 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:26 37.35 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 40 1.0867 68.3 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:27 37.34 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 97 300 40 1.0884 68.4 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:28 37.54 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 40 1.0558 69.2 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:29 37.47 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 40 1.0895 68.7 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:30 37.55 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 40 1.0895 69.3 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:31 37.56 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 40 1.0874 69.3 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:32 37.42 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 97 300 41 1.0889 68.2 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:33 37.29 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 94 300 41 1.0574 67.4 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:34 37.36 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 41 1.0570 67.8 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:35 37.34 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 41 1.0564 67.7 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:36 37.30 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 41 1.0565 67.5 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:37 37.37 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 41 1.0570 68.0 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:38 37.29 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 41 1.0580 67.2 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:39 37.24 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 41 1.0577 67.4 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:40 37.22 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 41 1.0571 67.3 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:41 37.17 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 41 1.0571 66.7 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:42 37.20 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 41 1.0570 66.9 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:43 37.09 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 41 1.0579 66.4 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:44 37.25 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 41 1.0573 67.2 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:45 37.01 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 41 1.0576 66.4 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:46 37.14 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 41 1.0266 66.7 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:47 37.15 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 41 1.0559 66.6 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:48 37.03 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 41 1.0571 66.1 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:49 36.99 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 41 1.0574 65.9 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:50 36.89 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0577 65.8 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:51 36.90 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 94 300 42 1.0571 65.3 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:52 36.89 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 41 1.0570 65.4 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:53 36.76 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 41 1.0579 64.4 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:54 36.83 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0592 64.5 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:55 36.81 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0254 65.3 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:56 36.89 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 94 300 42 1.0265 65.2 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:57 36.82 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0563 64.9 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:58 36.75 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0280 64.7 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:29:59 36.74 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 94 300 42 1.0564 64.9 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:00 36.78 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0563 64.8 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:01 36.63 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0565 64.1 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:02 36.64 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0278 64.3 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:03 36.74 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 42 1.0260 64.7 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:04 36.77 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0577 64.7 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:05 36.85 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 42 1.0254 65.3 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:06 36.85 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 42 1.0564 64.6 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:07 36.82 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 42 1.0261 65.2 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:08 36.78 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0566 64.6 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:09 36.86 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0260 64.6 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:10 36.81 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 42 1.0265 64.7 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:11 36.52 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0564 63.1 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:12 36.72 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 42 1.0564 64.2 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:13 36.71 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 42 1.0571 64.1 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:14 36.73 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0266 64.4 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:15 36.65 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 42 1.0570 63.7 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:16 36.81 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0591 64.5 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:17 36.73 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0265 64.2 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:18 36.79 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0571 64.4 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:19 36.57 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0569 63.7 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:20 36.62 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0591 63.9 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:21 36.58 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0259 63.6 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:22 36.58 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 94 300 42 1.0573 63.4 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:23 36.73 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0580 64.3 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:24 36.46 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0564 62.8 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:25 36.54 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0565 63.5 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:26 36.54 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 42 1.0255 63.6 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:27 36.72 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0254 64.5 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:28 36.56 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0253 63.3 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:29 36.46 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 42 1.0571 63.4 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:30 36.60 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 96 300 42 1.0265 63.7 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:31 36.55 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0259 63.4 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:32 36.57 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 94 300 42 1.0269 63.5 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:33 36.58 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0260 63.4 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:34 36.56 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0260 63.6 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:35 36.59 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0563 63.6 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:36 36.44 99.9 100.0 100.0 0 95 300 42 1.0579 62.5 AVGTEMP
2020-05-02 15:30:37 41.80 27.5 100.0 100.0 0 56 300 42 1.3053 34.6
2020-05-02 15:30:38 45.11 6.4 100.0 100.0 0 54 300 42 1.2944 17.6
2020-05-02 15:30:39 44.36 6.7 100.0 100.0 0 60 300 42 1.3322 18.5
2020-05-02 15:30:40 44.32 5.8 100.0 100.0 0 51 300 42 1.3339 16.3

Add your own comment

Intel 10th Gen Core "Comet Lake" Desktop Processor CPUID, TDP, and cTDP Revealed

27 Comments on Intel 10th Gen Core "Comet Lake" Desktop Processor CPUID, TDP, and cTDP Revealed

Latest GPU Drivers

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts

Intel 10th Gen Core "Comet Lake" Desktop Processor CPUID, TDP, and cTDP Revealed

Related News

27 Comments on Intel 10th Gen Core "Comet Lake" Desktop Processor CPUID, TDP, and cTDP Revealed

Latest GPU Drivers

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts