Well increase is 22% here. No need to lie. And getting these clocks with 2080 Ti could be made easily especially if you own a waterblock on 2080 Ti

DJ_CasperWell increase is 22% here. No need to lie. And getting these clocks with 2080 Ti could be made easily especially if you own a waterblock on 2080 Ti

It's actually 30.9% so TPU numbers are pretty accurate

Given all using stock clock frequency, If 3080 is 30% faster than 2080 ti and 2080 ti is 20% faster than 2080 then it means 3080 will be 50% faster than 2080, It sounds about right.

MetroidGiven all using stock clock frequency, If 3080 is 30% faster than 2080 ti and 2080 ti is 20% faster than 2080 then it means 3080 will be 50% faster than 2080, It sounds about right.

That's not how percentages work, it should be more than 50% (56%) according to your numbers. However, if your post actually implied that roughly, then I apologize.

EzioAsThat's not how percentages work, it should be more than 50% (56%) according to your numbers. However, if your post actually implied that roughly, then I apologize.

I just took the performance summary based on this review, www.techpowerup.com/review/asus-geforce-rtx-2080-ti-matrix/27.html , by my calculations right now 3080 is 50 to 60% faster than 2080 ti if the leak is right.

MetroidI just took the performance summary based on this review, www.techpowerup.com/review/asus-geforce-rtx-2080-ti-matrix/27.html , by my calculations right now 3080 is 50 to 60% faster than 2080 ti if the leak is right.

So you were implying that it was more than 50%, right? I apologize then. I thought you were saying that it's faster by exactly 50%.

EzioAsSo you were implying that it was more than 50%, right? I apologize then. I thought you were saying that it's faster exactly 50%.

As it's faster than 50%, I guess Nvidia will not launch the 3080 TI version, Nvidia will likely launch the 3080 TI version next year. The GTX 1080 launched on May 2016 then a year after that 1080 ti was released. This time will likely be the same

Depends on Team Red I guess

MetroidI just took the performance summary based on this review, www.techpowerup.com/review/asus-geforce-rtx-2080-ti-matrix/27.html , by my calculations right now 3080 is 50 to 60% faster than 2080 ti if the leak is right.

That is assuming that this is the 3080 and not the 3090. But there is no mention of which it is.

oh my, my rdna is shaking :(

If it is true that's not bad. Wonder how the Ray Tracing will look like with this since NV was pushing for it so badly. 30% performance up and the price would be how many % up or maybe down? (Yeah I don't believe in the price down option here)

If the perf is 30% higher then price will likely be at least 30% up over the previous gen, knowing Nvidia they'll still want to roll in the dough amidst a global pandemic :nutkick:

R0H1TIf the perf is 30% higher then price will likely be at least 30% up over the previous gen, knowing Nvidia they'll still want to roll in the dough amidst a global pandemic :nutkick:

30% at least. that's very optimistic but if the competition is there maybe your 30% price bump will be accurate depending on the competition. It's not long now till we know.

MetroidGiven all using stock clock frequency, If 3080 is 30% faster than 2080 ti and 2080 ti is 20% faster than 2080 then it means 3080 will be 50% faster than 2080, It sounds about right.

90/71=1.27x
117/71=1.65x

r.h.poh my, my rdna is shaking :(

rdna makers better think of their own dlss 2.0 cause even if this is 3090 it's gonna run over big navi with rtx/dlss on in triple A's

yeah, so much power, now i wonder and wait just tdp value,if it between 200-250w its excellent...also it have very high oc'd capacity.
and.. btw, its ,i repeat, it is 7nm rtx 3080 FE gpu with early drivers...well,i wait for it example msi lightning version or asus srtix advance oc version.

cuemanyeah, so much power, now i wonder and wait just tdp value,if it between 200-250w its excellent...also it have very high oc'd capacity.
and.. btw, its ,i repeat, it is 7nm rtx 3080 FE gpu with early drivers...well,i wait for it example msi lightning version or asus srtix advance oc version.

there's no indication of what it is.may be whatever.including fake.
I'll also be looking at ~250w cards.I was actually never fond of them,980Ti Gaming 6G was hot and loud,but my 1080ti trio and 2070s trio are so damn cool and quiet I'd have no problem with one.
I think 3080Ti will not be any more power hungry than 2080Ti imo,it'll be big die w. 275-285w power draw like turing.
I'm glad nvidia stepped up the game with good reference cooling at msrp on turing,hope they do the same on ampere.GN said they have info there's two versions of reference cooler - the new one comes from a new oem,the second one from one they worked with before.Good reference coolers at msrp prices means custom coolers have to cvompete harder on price/performance and we reap the benefits getting queiter coolers at lower markups than before.Back when I was getting my 2070S I only paid a 6% premium for trio over 2070S reference.I was actually pretty surprised.Meanwhile 57000xt nitro costs at least 10-15% more than reference.Even if it msrp's lower the shops will jack up the price knowing nobody's wanting reference anyway.

cucker tarlson90/71=1.27x
117/71=1.65x


rdna makers better think of their own dlss 2.0 cause even if this is 3090 it's gonna run over big navi with rtx/dlss on in triple A's

too right , tbh I’m happy for Nvidia I just think their cards are too expensive

That 1935MHz core clock seems pretty low if it's true, I honestly don't expect anything under 2GHz from a 7nm GeForce card.
I just hope they will give us options with more VRAM.
The rumored 10GB for the 3080 isn't bad, but not great either.

r.h.ptoo right , tbh I’m happy for Nvidia I just think their cards are too expensive

they've more features - I mean if new triple A's like cp2077 come with dlss 2.0 that just bought my 2070S a whole generation of upgrading,or more.I won't have to upgrade to run it given how massive performance gains are.
they've no competition from tu104 up and tu116 down
they've more stable drivers and support cuda

if navi 10 is just as fast,equal in features and has no weak points that'll be it for nvidia's prices

Or it could be 3090 with 5428, 20% more shaders and 6% clock, with 18Gbps or 24Gbps memory. What doesn't make sense is the size. 5376 should be 500mm2 or less. This means 2x more transistors for only 20% more cores.

ppnOr it could be 3090 with 5428, 20% more shaders and 6% clock, with 18Gbps or 24Gbps memory. What doesn't make sense is the size. 5376 should be 500mm2 or less. This means 2x more transistors for only 20% more cores.

how are you getting the size and transistor count ?

i dont care for 30% faster just make it slower with display port 2.0 and hdmi 2.1

upgrade urge after 4 years :D come on RTX 3090 cant wait

R0H1TIf the perf is 30% higher then price will likely be at least 30% up over the previous gen, knowing Nvidia they'll still want to roll in the dough amidst a global pandemic :nutkick:

I don't believe any consumerism corporation really cares whatever is happening out there in the world. Hardcore consumers bought pre-pandemic and will do during or past it.

r.h.poh my, my rdna is shaking :(

Your RDNA of which size/price is shaking, chuckle?

cucker tarlsondlss

AMD already has own alternative to DLSS, it was compared to 1.0 and conclusion was it clearly beats it (no comparisons to 2.0 yet), which went unnoticed by the folks from the known camp, as, ultimately, it's about fanboism.