Monday, December 20th 2021

Lightelligence's Optical Processor Outperforms GPUs by 100 Times in Some of The Hardest Math Problems

Optical computing has been the research topic of many startups and tech companies like Intel and IBM, searching for the practical approach to bring a new way of computing. However, the most innovative solutions often come out of startups and today is no exception. According to the report from EETimes, optical computing startup Lightelligence has developed a processor that outperforms regular GPUs by 100 times in calculating some of the most challenging mathematical problems. As the report indicates, the Photonic Arithmetic Computing Engine (PACE) from Lightelligence manages to outperform regular GPUs, like NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 3080, by almost 100 times in the NP-complete class of problems.

More precisely, the PACE accelerator was tackling the Ising model, an example of a thermodynamic system used for understanding phase transitions, and it achieved some impressive results. Compared to the RTX 3080, it reached 100 times greater speed-up. All of that was performed using 12,000 optical devices integrated onto a circuit and running at 1 GHz frequency. Compared to the purpose-built Toshiba's simulated bifurcation machine based on FPGAs, the PACE still outperforms this system designed to tackle the Ising mathematical computation by 25 times. The PACE chip uses standard silicon photonics integration of Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI) for computing and MEMS to change the waveguide shape in the MZI.
Lightelligence Photonic Arithmetic Computing Engine Lightelligence Photonic Arithmetic Computing Engine
It is worth pointing out that this approach demonstrates that optical computation, more specifically Lightelligence's direction, is helpful for more sets of problems compared to "just" Artificial Intelligence. These computationally expensive classes of mathematical problems, like Ising, are often found in material science, thermodynamics, bioinformatics, cryptography, circuit design, power grid optimization, and much more.
Source: EETimes
Add your own comment

35 Comments on Lightelligence's Optical Processor Outperforms GPUs by 100 Times in Some of The Hardest Math Problems

#1
jigar2speed
I hope it does mining, so that people can leave the GPUs alone.
Posted on Reply
#2
Sakamoto Tottori
jigar2speedI hope it does mining, so that people can leave the GPUs alone.
amen to this brother :toast:
Posted on Reply
#3
Ferrum Master
We are still comparing a tailored ASIC with general purpose silicon that is jack of all trades. Tailored ASIC's are usually miles faster at that single math discipline it is designed for, like hardware video encoders for example.

100 times faster? It ain't that groundbreaking.

As working tech demonstrator it is... but the comparison ain't fair here, it ain't apples to apples.
Posted on Reply
#4
spnidel
I remember seeing cures for cancer and AIDS over the last 10-15 years too
Posted on Reply
#5
Ferrum Master
btarunrPlease make ASICs with this tech so the crypto crowd can FO.
It won't solve the shortage. ASICs any kind of them would be bite off the share of TSMC anyways and leaving us the short stick anyways. We need a cheap foundry alternatives like SMIC to ramp up sub 14nm nodes along with UMC to ignite competition. They are way too late to the party and hurts us all.
Posted on Reply
#6
Metroid
I guess this startup needs the hype to get the funds from sheeps and the "100x better than 3080" is perfect for the hype.
Posted on Reply
#7
lexluthermiester
jigar2speedI hope it does mining, so that people can leave the GPUs alone.
That will likely be a perfect use-case-scenario. Now if they can only mass produce them..
Posted on Reply
#8
Bomby569
jigar2speedI hope it does mining, so that people can leave the GPUs alone.
mining is all about money, i imagine this to be a lot more expensive (new tech, not mass produced), some math had to be done on price vs performance
Posted on Reply
#9
oobymach
Slap that puppy on a gpu and sell it, asap if not sooner. I wonder how many fps it gets at 8k.
Posted on Reply
#10
Redwoodz
Ferrum MasterWe are still comparing a tailored ASIC with general purpose silicon that is jack of all trades. Tailored ASIC's are usually miles faster at that single math discipline it is designed for, like hardware video encoders for example.

100 times faster? It ain't that groundbreaking.

As working tech demonstrator it is... but the comparison ain't fair here, it ain't apples to apples.
It clearly states this Optical processor beats even the purpose built asics by 25%.
Posted on Reply
#11
mechtech
And the questionin every gamers mind…..

will it mine way faster than gpus and be cheaper than gpus and when will it be available in mass quantities

lol
Posted on Reply
#12
DeathtoGnomes
mechtechAnd the questionin every gamers mind…..

will it mine way faster than gpus and be cheaper than gpus and when will it be available in mass quantities

lol
but can it play Crysis?
Posted on Reply
#13
Steevo
RedwoodzIt clearly states this Optical processor beats even the purpose built asics by 25%.
No doubt a optical switch setup is faster at switching photons, but with no ability to store data, reliance on existing tech for converting I'm fairly certain their claims are for "processing speed" of a clearly defined linear non branching data stream that has been spoon fed to their device to get more investment.

I'm sure in the right server setup it will be amazing, but its still light years away form general purpose computing and the masses.
Posted on Reply
#14
Vya Domus
"Outperform GPUs by 100 times" is a blanket statement. You can build many conventional processors that are 100 times faster than a GPU at a lot of different things, the question is, is it faster at general purpose computation ?
Posted on Reply
#15
r9
To @W1zzard When can we expect review ?
To All But can it do Halo Infinite 4k@60FPS ?
Posted on Reply
#16
Totally
Ferrum MasterWe are still comparing a tailored ASIC with general purpose silicon that is jack of all trades. Tailored ASIC's are usually miles faster at that single math discipline it is designed for, like hardware video encoders for example.

100 times faster? It ain't that groundbreaking.

As working tech demonstrator it is... but the comparison ain't fair here, it ain't apples to apples.
People are aware it was mentioned in the article that it still was 25 times faster than a traditional ASIC
Vya Domus"Outperform GPUs by 100 times" is a blanket statement. You can build many conventional processors that are 100 times faster than a GPU at a lot of different things, the question is, is it faster at general purpose computation ?
Does it matter if you only need it to do one thing?
Posted on Reply
#17
windwhirl
jigar2speedI hope it does mining, so that people can leave the GPUs alone.
It really doesn't matter because the systems are designed to increase the difficulty every time the processing power or the amount of mined crypto exceeds certain limits
Posted on Reply
#18
Steevo
windwhirlIt really doesn't matter because the systems are designed to increase the difficulty every time the processing power or the amount of mined crypto exceeds certain limits
Designed to waste more energy and consume more to create nothing of value.
Posted on Reply
#19
Minus Infinity
Vya Domus"Outperform GPUs by 100 times" is a blanket statement. You can build many conventional processors that are 100 times faster than a GPU at a lot of different things, the question is, is it faster at general purpose computation ?
There are thousands fields of science and engineering alone that would massively benefit from hardware that could solve certain classes of problems a 100x faster. They specifically don't use general purpose hardware for everything because they are too slow. The article specifically mentions "NP-complete class of problems". There are exist many such problems that have no efficient algorithms at all to solve them. These problems run in superpolynomial time which can be exponentially or factorially slow.
Posted on Reply
#20
purecain
I want one... ^^ :D :toast:
spnidelI remember seeing cures for cancer and AIDS over the last 10-15 years too
Cancer cant survive in an alkaline environment. Drink enough pure water every day with iodine to keep your body Alkaline and try to eat organic greens, herbs etc...
Posted on Reply
#21
bug
I'm surprised no one has seen the elephant in the room: some of the hardest math problems are NP complete (or worse). Throwing 100x more HP at them does little more than squat.
Posted on Reply
#22
Steevo
purecainI want one... ^^ :D :toast:


Cancer cant survive in an alkaline environment. Drink enough pure water every day with iodine to keep your body Alkaline and try to eat organic greens, herbs etc...
The calcium in your bones are the biggest PH balance in your body, alkaline water is snake oil.
Posted on Reply
#23
R-T-B
jigar2speedI hope it does mining, so that people can leave the GPUs alone.
I wish mining would stop creeping into threads it does not belong in...
spnidelI remember seeing cures for cancer and AIDS over the last 10-15 years too
No, you don't. There has been progress but no hard cures.
lexluthermiesterThat will likely be a perfect use-case-scenario. Now if they can only mass produce them..
How so? This doesn't do any kind of meaningful data hash that I can see.
oobymachSlap that puppy on a gpu and sell it, asap if not sooner. I wonder how many fps it gets at 8k.
0, son. Wrong kind of math.
RedwoodzIt clearly states this Optical processor beats even the purpose built asics by 25%.
that is not unheard of for FPGAs (which are hardly purpose built) vs ASICs.
TotallyPeople are aware it was mentioned in the article that it still was 25 times faster than a traditional ASIC
*FPGA
SteevoDesigned to waste more energy and consume more to create nothing of value.
Please, the topic...
Posted on Reply
#24
Frank_100
DeathtoGnomesbut can it play Crysis?
:peace:
Posted on Reply
#25
lexluthermiester
R-T-BI wish mining would stop creeping into threads it does not belong in...
While I would normally agree, in this case, the context is valid. If these optical processors can be utilized for cryptocoin mining, it would be very attractive and beneficial for everyone. The mere prospect of such is an exciting possibility! Do you not agree?
R-T-BHow so? This doesn't do any kind of meaningful data hash that I can see.
Do you not think it could be easily adapted? Given what's been stated, I think it would be trivial to recompile mining code to run on such a processor.

In my eyes, this development is the way forward for computing long term. Optical CPU/GPU/APU would not suffer from heat and power consumption like traditional silicon based IC's do. Very exciting indeed!
DeathtoGnomesbut can it play Crysis?
While it is clear you say that in jest, I suggest that with the code properly complied and optimized, such a processor would likely be able to run dozens of instances of Crysis simultaneously.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 09:47 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts