Friday, March 4th 2022

AMD and Intel Stop Processor Shipments to Russia and Belarus

Unless you have been living under a rock, chances are you are following the news about the Russia-Ukraine war disputes. Not to get too political, we are here to report about your favorite rivals—AMD and Intel—officially stopping the delivery of processors to Russia and Belarus. Firstly, an AMD representative told PCWorld that "Based on sanctions placed on Russia by the United States and other nations, at this time AMD is suspending its sales and distribution of our products into Russia and Belarus. It is all AMD products and products we power (PCs, etc) in Russia and Belarus." Additionally, Intel posted an official quote, which you can find below.
IntelIntel condemns the invasion of Ukraine by Russia and we have suspended all shipments to customers in both Russia and Belarus. Our thoughts are with everyone who has been impacted by this war, including the people of Ukraine and the surrounding countries and all those around the world with family, friends and loved ones in the region.

"We are working to support all of our employees through this difficult situation, especially those with close ties to this region. We have launched an employee donation and matching campaign through the Intel Foundation that has already raised over $1.2 million for relief efforts, and we are proud of the work our teams in surrounding areas including Poland, Germany and Romania are doing to aid refugees. We will continue to stand with the people of Ukraine and the global community in calling for an immediate end to this war and a swift return to peace.
Sources: PCWorld (AMD Quote), Intel, via VideoCardz
Add your own comment

95 Comments on AMD and Intel Stop Processor Shipments to Russia and Belarus

#76
WhitetailAni
medi01China - Taiwan is like North/South Korea.
What?! No!!
Russia sees Ukraine as its rightful territory. Ukraine sees itself as its own country.
China sees Taiwan as its rightful territory. Taiwan sees itself as its own country.
Posted on Reply
#77
Bomby569
R-T-BThey blunt Russias ability to wage this war and future wars. I don't see how that's nothing.
If they bought their equipament, sure. But they don't, so not even that. The only thing that will stop this is a bullet in Puttin's brain.
Posted on Reply
#78
trsttte
R-T-BThat would be the best case, but I have doubts it will be easy.
It won't, it never is. It will get worst before it gets better but there's really no other way.
RealKGBTaiwan sees itself as its own country.
They actually don't, in every poll maintaining the status quo always won (independence has been gaining some traction in recent years with younger generations but it's still far from the majority)
Posted on Reply
#79
TheUn4seen
This is, of course, purely a PR announcement. But who cares, starve those animals. Excuse me if I'm being "too political", I have friends in Ukraine.
As for saying "they can buy through third parties": Yes, they can. Only in limited quantities though - you need money to buy things, even more so if your only option is to buy through predatory resellers, something that should be painfully obvious to anyone wanting to buy a GPU after Q2 2020. Russian economy quickly goes from from "slowly rotting gutter" to the "bottom of an outhouse" level, which is exacerbated by the fact that most of their companies are now worthless and are being bought en masse by the Chinese and anyone with the ability to get their assets through special purpose entities. If the western sanctions hold, soon only China will be a reseller available to ruskies, and China is nothing if not opportunistic, borderline predatory, as it is.
I don't foresee many gamers coming from Russia in the next years. Which is great, I really dislike those people in Eve Online.
Posted on Reply
#80
Space Lynx
Astronaut
R-T-BYou are massively underestimating the damage this is going to do longterm to Russia. They can close off from the world and turn to China yes, but make no mistake, that will be of limited use. China is not a substitute for a global economy.
its as close as one can get though. to be fair.
Posted on Reply
#81
ThrashZone
Hi,
I'm sure Russia made accommodations before doing this and knows full well the USA atm is programed on lame mode.
Posted on Reply
#82
Space Lynx
Astronaut
ThrashZoneHi,
I'm sure Russia made accommodations before doing this and knows full well the USA atm is programed on lame mode.
and has crypto stockpiled ;)
Posted on Reply
#83
lilhasselhoffer
CallandorWoTRussian oligarchs are safe in Maldives at the moment living the good life on their yachts, until America grows some balls and says fuck it and just seizes those yachts anyway, the oligarchs won't change their ways. I mean what's the Maldives gonna do, whats point of having greatest navy in world if we dont use it when we need it? Maldives might ban us from vacationing there? good riddance, plenty of other nice places to go anyway. UN might slap us on the wrist, but I doubt it, lol

America plays by the rules to often, and no other country does, and they only get slapped on the wrist when they dont. even when the dust settles from all of this, Russia will "negotiate" and things will go back to normal since he controls the energy for a lot of the west.
?

I'm perplexed. When the US had its teeth kicked in, post 9/11, we did exactly this with Afghanistan. We defined what we saw as bad people, who reasonably saw terrorism as a resolution to their ideological differences. Our response was to go kick down the doors, and the rest of the world claimed that we were acting as a global police force that nobody wanted or needed.

The above proposal is to have the US do the exact same thing, but instead of kicking somebody who was tangentially linked to the event you want us to start kicking the oligarchs. Individuals who learned from Japan in WWII, and have rightly left the sleeping dog lie with regards to the US. Our motivation for doing so is to liberate Russia, spread democracy, and doing all of this only because we want more democracy?


I'm trying to frame this so the ask is rational. So far, the theoretical spread of democracy is literally the only upside of this transaction.

Alternatively, we can push our internal benefactors to not provide resources to Russia. This takes almost no political capitol, and doesn't require any manpower. The result, in an interconnected world, is the collapse of infrastructure and markets. Market drive everything, because there is functionally no longer a self-sufficient economy on this planet. The only point of failure here would be if a third party restored the lost economic activity, which would functionally mean that there were two pariahs if those original actions bringing down a sanction were universally viewed as abhorrent.

Of course, abhorrent is rather plastic. War crimes, invasions, and genocide generally are the only thing that would be considered to be universally abhorrent...and wouldn't you look at that. Russian invasions of land seem to fit the bill.





I suppose that the US finally learned that there are more subtle ways of doing things...because military conflict is no longer possible between large powers. It's not even really a viable tactic against people whose most advanced hardware is an AK-47. What you're asking for is decisive action against people who you think are evil...to right a perceived wrong...and the cost of that moral policing should fall on the US...because? I'm just laughing, because a decade ago this suggestion would have been jingoistic talk from the extreme bits of the US. Oh, how the pendulum swings.


Back on point though, this is about Intel and AMD. Best case scenario their stuff is used in military hardware...which the sanctions will severely cripple the production of. Oligarchs living high off of money siphoned from a corrupt political system is kind of beyond the pale here. I don't think forcing them to pay 200% MSRP for a CPU can ever really address that.
Posted on Reply
#84
Space Lynx
Astronaut
lilhasselhoffer?

I'm perplexed. When the US had its teeth kicked in, post 9/11, we did exactly this with Afghanistan. We defined what we saw as bad people, who reasonably saw terrorism as a resolution to their ideological differences. Our response was to go kick down the doors, and the rest of the world claimed that we were acting as a global police force that nobody wanted or needed.

The above proposal is to have the US do the exact same thing, but instead of kicking somebody who was tangentially linked to the event you want us to start kicking the oligarchs. Individuals who learned from Japan in WWII, and have rightly left the sleeping dog lie with regards to the US. Our motivation for doing so is to liberate Russia, spread democracy, and doing all of this only because we want more democracy?


I'm trying to frame this so the ask is rational. So far, the theoretical spread of democracy is literally the only upside of this transaction.

Alternatively, we can push our internal benefactors to not provide resources to Russia. This takes almost no political capitol, and doesn't require any manpower. The result, in an interconnected world, is the collapse of infrastructure and markets. Market drive everything, because there is functionally no longer a self-sufficient economy on this planet. The only point of failure here would be if a third party restored the lost economic activity, which would functionally mean that there were two pariahs if those original actions bringing down a sanction were universally viewed as abhorrent.

Of course, abhorrent is rather plastic. War crimes, invasions, and genocide generally are the only thing that would be considered to be universally abhorrent...and wouldn't you look at that. Russian invasions of land seem to fit the bill.





I suppose that the US finally learned that there are more subtle ways of doing things...because military conflict is no longer possible between large powers. It's not even really a viable tactic against people whose most advanced hardware is an AK-47. What you're asking for is decisive action against people who you think are evil...to right a perceived wrong...and the cost of that moral policing should fall on the US...because? I'm just laughing, because a decade ago this suggestion would have been jingoistic talk from the extreme bits of the US. Oh, how the pendulum swings.


Back on point though, this is about Intel and AMD. Best case scenario their stuff is used in military hardware...which the sanctions will severely cripple the production of. Oligarchs living high off of money siphoned from a corrupt political system is kind of beyond the pale here. I don't think forcing them to pay 200% MSRP for a CPU can ever really address that.
huh? you wouldn't have to go on any Maldives land to seize the oligarchs yachts... Navy will just round the yachts up and leave, whether there is anyone on board or not....
Posted on Reply
#85
ZeppMan217
ThrashZoneHi,
I'm sure Russia made accommodations before doing this and knows full well the USA atm is programed on lame mode.
If destroying your opponent's economy, built up over 25 odd years, in the span of a week is considered "lame mode", I'd hate to see the maximum setting. It probably goes past 11.
Posted on Reply
#86
Space Lynx
Astronaut
ZeppMan217If destroying your opponent's economy, built up over 25 odd years, in the span of a week is considered "lame mode", I'd hate to see the maximum setting. It probably goes past 11.
don't forget, how closely Putin sat with China's leader during the olympic opening. ;) they didn't decide that randomly. I assure you.
Posted on Reply
#87
Bomby569
ZeppMan217If destroying your opponent's economy, built up over 25 odd years, in the span of a week is considered "lame mode", I'd hate to see the maximum setting. It probably goes past 11.
no ones economy is doing very good this days, EU and US stocks are bleeding red. Hardly everyone wind in a war.
Posted on Reply
#88
James7787
All these big western companies trying to give impression they have any power by banning their products in Russia is ultimate cringe.
Posted on Reply
#89
ThrashZone
ZeppMan217If destroying your opponent's economy, built up over 25 odd years, in the span of a week is considered "lame mode", I'd hate to see the maximum setting. It probably goes past 11.
Hi,
Think you're overrating sanctions effects and underestimating underground railroads lol
Posted on Reply
#90
trsttte
Bomby569no ones economy is doing very good this days, EU and US stocks are bleeding red. Hardly everyone wind in a war.
Stock market having a rough ride (-10% to -20% ytd on most indices) is very different from the economy going to shit (currency lost ~50% of the value in a less than a week)
Posted on Reply
#91
Bomby569
James7787All these big western companies trying to give impression they have any power by banning their products in Russia is ultimate cringe.
it's mostly PR, needs to be done, even shitty companies can be good guys now. It's in every PR department guide
Posted on Reply
#92
Forza.Milan
is more supply to others country? AMD GPU?
Posted on Reply
#93
ThrashZone
Bomby569it's mostly PR, needs to be done, even shitty companies can be good guys now. It's in every PR department guide
Hi,
Yeah say one thing and do another :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#94
Bomby569
Forza.Milanis more supply to others country? AMD GPU?
I doubt it makes any difference. And if they want they will still get GPU'S, most of them are made in China and they couldn't care less but to send them shipments of them
Posted on Reply
#95
95Viper
Threads that should/will be closed
Threads whose topic may be seen as politically or religiously sensitive, this includes posts within a thread.
This may include a thread going off topic with posts that include the above depending on how the community is responding.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jul 31st, 2024 10:25 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts