Wednesday, March 30th 2022
Intel Arc "Alchemist" Mobile GPU Lineup Revealed
Intel is preparing to debut the Arc "Alchemist" line of graphics processors with a mobile-first approach, where the company leverages its bulletproof relations with notebook manufacturers to use its discrete mobile GPUs to go with their 12th Gen Core "Alder Lake" processors. These will be launch in two tranches, with the first round expected as early as today (March 30), according to a VideoCardz report citing a leaked company slide. The series will debut with the Arc 3 series of entry-level discrete GPUs, before moving onto the mid-range Arc 5 and premium Arc 7 series "early summer" (we read that as May-June, 2022).
The entire lineup of Arc "Alchemist" is based on two ASICs, the smaller one is the ACM-G11, or DG2-128; while the larger one is the ACM-G10, or DG2-512. The former comes with 128 execution units (EU), while the larger one has 512 EU. The Arc 3 series, consisting of the A350M and A370M, come with 96 and 128 EU (768 and 1,024 unified shaders), respectively, The mid-range Arc A550M is based on the lowest trim of the DG2-512, with half its EU count disabled (256 EU, or 2,048 shaders). The Arc A730M has three-fourths of the EU count enabled, while the A770M maxes it out.
What's interesting is the memory configuration for the Arc 3 series, which sees just 4 GB of it, across a 64-bit memory bus. The A550M gets a respectable 8 GB across 128-bit, the A730M has 12 GB across 192-bit, and the top-dog A770M maxes out the 256-bit wide memory bus, with an impressive 16 GB of memory. Intel will debut these GPUs with the company's Deep Link technology, which allows the Xe HPG discrete GPU and an Xe-LP based iGPU in "Alder Lake" processors to work in greater collaboration, including a form of implicit asymmetric multi-GPU, with pooled power-budgets (Intel Dynamic Power Share) and resource-sharing in not just gaming, but also video encoding (Intel Hyper Encode). The Xe HPG graphics architecture will be Intel's first with DirectX 12 Ultimate readiness, including real-time ray tracing. It will also debut the XeSS (Xe Super Sampling) performance enhancement feature, which is functionally analogous to AMD FSR or NVIDIA DLSS.
Source:
VideoCardz
The entire lineup of Arc "Alchemist" is based on two ASICs, the smaller one is the ACM-G11, or DG2-128; while the larger one is the ACM-G10, or DG2-512. The former comes with 128 execution units (EU), while the larger one has 512 EU. The Arc 3 series, consisting of the A350M and A370M, come with 96 and 128 EU (768 and 1,024 unified shaders), respectively, The mid-range Arc A550M is based on the lowest trim of the DG2-512, with half its EU count disabled (256 EU, or 2,048 shaders). The Arc A730M has three-fourths of the EU count enabled, while the A770M maxes it out.
25 Comments on Intel Arc "Alchemist" Mobile GPU Lineup Revealed
Not counting all the forgotten ones that never made any real world difference, no matter how good they looked on paper..
..yeah, this might be just another one of the latter, tho I doubt it.
Power draw looks pretty good. If they're good enough to compete at mid-range, they may still be interesting, though.
And yes, that story is true, but I think the comparison is apt. It doesn't matter where Core came from. You could also argue Arc is an evolution of IGPs before it.
Also the A770M model naming instead of A780M despite 150W TDP and 16GB memory doesn't inspire much hope regarding performance either.
We will see, let's hope they deliver, we need a third player to boost competition.
7 minutes:
Mobile = a much larger market than desktop
I think this will hurt Nvidia more in the longer term than AMD but we shall see.
Want a CPU? What if we sell you a gpu too at a massive discount? Oh and look at this pretty little EVO certified sticker, you want that don't you?
Nvidia will be the main one loosing this time, with AMD also pushing for their own certification and own vertical technologies.
Of course, that's not a guarantee this is what we're looking at this round, but my gut feeling tells me it is. And I'm ok even with that. I wasn't looking to buy a high-end card from Intel. I was just hoping for a decent mid-ranger.
And stop it with the "rough start" nonsense. They've been building GPUs since forever, just not in discrete form. Do you honestly believe adding a few VRMs and VRAM chips onto a PCB is the tough part in designing a video card?