Tuesday, May 24th 2022

Hands On with the new Gigabyte X670 Motherboards at Computex 2022

Computex 2022 is what's being referred to as a hybrid show and although most of the motherboard manufacturers chose not to exhibit this year, Gigabyte was at the show and we got to take a closer look at its new AM5 motherboards. Gigabyte was only showing four models, but on the plus side, the staff at the booth was more than happy to share details about the boards with us. The four boards on display were the X670E Aorus Xtreme, the X670E Aorus Master, the X670E Aero D and the X670 Aorus Pro AX. Note that these were early board revision and the E is missing in the model name from three of the models, which suggests that AMD hadn't informed the board makers about this distinction between its chipsets until earlier this month when rumours about it started to appear online.

Gigabyte will have a full lineup of boards coming later this year when AMD launches its AM5 platform, although based on the information we were given, the majority of its boards will be based on the B650 chipset. We should point out that there will be high-end B650 motherboards that will be priced similar to lower-end X670 models, which means that buying AM5 motherboards will be highly dependent on what features you favour. Unfortunately no B650 motherboards were on display and we won't be sharing any details of these models at this time. As for the X670E versus X670 chipsets, as there are of course two per board, it seems like the difference comes down to PCIe 5.0 or PCIe 4.0 for the x16 PCIe slot as the major differentiator between Gigabyte's different SKUs.
Starting from the bottom and working up, we have the X670 Aorus Pro AX, although there will also be an Elite model that should sit below the Pro in terms of features and pricing. The X670 Aorus Pro AX has a single PCIe 4.0 x16 for the graphic card, one PCIe 4.0 x4 slot and one PCIe 3.0 x2 slot, although the latter two use physical PCIe x16 slots. The board has a single PCIe 5.0 M.2 slot, as well as three PCIe 4.0 M.2 slots. Furthermore it has support for two USB-C 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps) ports, one at the rear and one header for a case mounted port. There's also a USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) port, but it's unclear if this will support DisplayPort Alt Mode or not.
Other features include a 90A 16+2+2 power phase design, a 2.5 Gbps Ethernet port powered by an Intel chip, an Intel based WiFi 6E card, six SATA ports, a bunch of USB-A ports, a DisplayPort and HDMI out of unspecified flavours and a pair of 3.5 mm audio jacks alongside an optical S/PDIF out. We also spotted over half a dozen fan headers and the usual buttons for clearing the CMOS, power the board on etc. Overall this looks like a reasonably well featured board that sits in a bit of a strange place. The retail price should be just north of US$300.

Next up we have the X670E Aero D, which just as previous Aero boards is targeting creators, or at least people that are looking for fast external storage connectivity. Here we find a PCIe 5.0 x16 slot and this is also Gigabyte's only X670E so far, with USB4 connectivity. An ASMedia ASM4242 USB4 host controller is used and the board ends up with a pair of rear mounted USB4 ports thanks to it that also supports DP Alt Mode and Thunderbolt 3. The board also has a PCIe 5.0 M.2 slot, as well as a further three PCIe 4.0 M.2 slots. This was also the only board that we could flip over and snap a picture of its fairly empty backside. However, we wanted to do this to show where the chipsets are located, which are on the bottom left side of the picture, surrounded by four screws.
Gigabyte has introduced another new feature, for Gigabyte at least, on this board, a push button that releases the graphics card latch, something ASUS had on some of its Z690 motherboards. The two x16 slots at the bottom of the board have the same configuration as the X670 Aorus Pro AX and the rest of the board is fairly similar in terms of the feature set. A nice addition here is a POST80 debug LED display and for some reason Gigabyte added a little leather tag to the heatsink over the PCIe 5.0 M.2 slot. Price wise, the X670E Aero D should end up somewhat below US$400.

The next entry is the X670E Aorus Master, which drops the USB4 chip in favour of a second PCIe 5.0 M.2 slot. Here Gigabyte has also upgraded the power design to a 105 A design, although the power phase count remains the same at 16+2+2. There's also a nicely finned heatsink here over the power regulation components, but beyond that, there isn't much that differs compared to the Aero D, although the rear USB-C ports are of the 20 Gbps and 10 Gbps variety, where the 10 Gbps port also supports DP Alt Mode. Pricing here is also a bit cheaper, with retail pricing ending up around the US$360 mark, which is close to what the X570S Aorus Master launched at.
Finally we have the X670E Aorus Xtreme, which is a very shiny motherboard if nothing else. Once again there are some fairly minor improvements here, with a 105 A 18-phase power design that gets a slightly beefier heatsink. The biggest difference between the Xtreme and the previous boards is support for up to four PCIe 5.0 M.2 slots, although this comes at the cost of the graphics card slot being limited to eight lanes of bandwidth, instead of 16. This is also the only X670-series board from Gigabyte with onboard 10 Gbps Ethernet that has been announced and it features the Marvell AQC113C, which is connected over PCIe 4.0. This is also the only board with actual buttons around the back for Q-Flash Plus and clearing the CMOS. One interesting detail here, is that the heatsink is made from die cast aluminium, rather than the more commonly used and much cheaper extruded type that heatsinks are mostly made from. Price wise, the X670E Aorus Xtreme will be cheaper than its X570 sibling at around $500.
Note that some PCIe related features might be shared on some of these boards due to how AMD has designed the X670/E chipset and the PCIe 3.0 slot is also shared with two SATA ports. There's a possibility that some of the hardware features will change before launch and the pricing isn't set in stone either. We're going to follow up with an article explaining a bit more about the X670 and B650 chipsets and some of the limitations of AMD's new take on what a chipset is.
Add your own comment

28 Comments on Hands On with the new Gigabyte X670 Motherboards at Computex 2022

#1
chodaboy19
Wow these metal shrouds are getting out of control...
Posted on Reply
#2
TheLostSwede
News Editor
chodaboy19Wow these metal shrouds are getting out of control...
Got to keep 'em SSDs cool.
Posted on Reply
#3
Crackong
So
Is this a config for the top X670E boards?

1x PCIE 5.0 x16
1x PCIE 5.0 x4 m.2
3x PCIE 4.0 x4 m.2
2x PCIE 4.0 x2
2x USB4
4x USB 10G
4x USB 5G
6x SATA
1x Front USB-C 20G
Posted on Reply
#4
jesdals
I would like either 3x USB c for video output or 3x Displayport, these combos is a pain when using several identical monitors. Hopeing for some good onboard gpu functions that can limit the extreme powerdraw of highend gpus when not needed

I Like the gpu unmounting button - hope these boards have easy SSD nvme install aswell
Posted on Reply
#5
kapone32
CrackongSo
Is this a config for the top X670E boards?

1x PCIE 5.0 x16
1x PCIE 5.0 x4 m.2
3x PCIE 4.0 x4 m.2
2x PCIE 4.0 x2
2x USB4
4x USB 10G
4x USB 5G
6x SATA
1x Front USB-C 20G
It looks like th eother expansion slots are wired as x4. Could be 3.0 to the chipset.
Posted on Reply
#6
Chaitanya
Good to see Gigabyte keeping 6x Sata ports and their heatsinks for primary M.2 have gotten lot more beefier compared to their current Z690 boards.

Also it seems like Gigabyte has copied quick release for PCI-e x16 slot from Asus.
Posted on Reply
#7
Crackong
kapone32It looks like th eother expansion slots are wired as x4. Could be 3.0 to the chipset.
The front picture shows "PCIE X2" marking between the 2nd and 3rd slots, but yeah the back of it looks like an x4

Okay A bit closer look and the 2nd slot is an x4 the third one is an x2
Posted on Reply
#9
konga
Looking at the PCIe slot arrangements, so far Gigabyte and Asus are betting on 4-slot GPU coolers being a big thing in the future, while MSI and ASRock are betting on 3-slot coolers. Maybe this tells us something about each company's own GPU cooler plans? Or maybe the motherboard teams at MSI and ASRock haven't gotten the memo yet.
Posted on Reply
#11
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
chodaboy19Wow these metal shrouds are getting out of control...
You cant see the IO logo when a big air cooler is installed anyway, no point in stylizing that area..

The way these boards are cut they look like matx and not ATX
Posted on Reply
#12
megaclite
Can anyone ask gigabyte why they cheaper than previous line up?
Posted on Reply
#13
jesdals
megacliteCan anyone ask gigabyte why they cheaper than previous line up?
Please dont :D they might change it :D
Posted on Reply
#14
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
megacliteCan anyone ask gigabyte why they cheaper than previous line up?
Matx
Posted on Reply
#15
Nephilim666
eidairaman1Matx
Are we looking at the same boards? Clearly >ATX
Posted on Reply
#16
trsttte
So next generation will be based around GPU occupying 4 slots? Every AM5 board seen so far seems to be accounting for that :shadedshu:

I hope they don't try to push (and price the products with) X670E on everything with just a couple lower end X670 non-E, I'm yet to see advantages with the dual chipset and I'm already expecting chaos to ensue with the firmware implementation.
Posted on Reply
#17
konga
The regular X670 is dual-chipset too. It's the same chipset actually, and the names are only different to reflect more PCIe 5.0 support on the E boards. Also, the boards we've seen from MSI and ASRock have the PCIe slots closer together. Though MSI is doing a weird thing on most of their boards where the GPU slot is in slot #3. I can see that restricting off airflow on a lot of larger cards.
eidairaman1Matx
They're clearly ATX boards. Maybe the metal cover is making it harder to discern scale, but these are 7-slot boards.

Slot 1 is taken up by an m.2 slot, slot 2 is a PCIe x16 slot, slots 3, 4, and 5 are m.2 slots covered by the large metal heat spreader, and slots 6 and 7 are more PCIe x16 slots.
Posted on Reply
#18
trsttte
kongaThe regular X670 is dual-chipset too. It's the same chipset actually, and the names are only different to reflect more PCIe 5.0 support on the E boards.
What? I completely missed that, I thought regular X670 was a single chip, that's a bit unsettling. Guess we'll need to wait and see then how it turns out and if they can fix the issues present on x570
Posted on Reply
#19
kapone32
kongaThe regular X670 is dual-chipset too. It's the same chipset actually, and the names are only different to reflect more PCIe 5.0 support on the E boards. Also, the boards we've seen from MSI and ASRock have the PCIe slots closer together. Though MSI is doing a weird thing on most of their boards where the GPU slot is in slot #3. I can see that restricting off airflow on a lot of larger cards.


They're clearly ATX boards. Maybe the metal cover is making it harder to discern scale, but these are 7-slot boards.

Slot 1 is taken up by an m.2 slot, slot 2 is a PCIe x16 slot, slots 3, 4, and 5 are m.2 slots covered by the large metal heat spreader, and slots 6 and 7 are more PCIe x16 slots.
These are all at least E-ATX but look like M_ATX
Posted on Reply
#21
Mysteoa
ChaitanyaMSI infringing on Maingear patent
Gigabyte already infringe it.
Posted on Reply
#22
Daven
In its hey day the microATX form factor allowed slightly smaller PCs at the expense of losing a few expansion slots. ATX was about 6-7 slots and microATX was about 3-4. Fast forward to today. Motherboards have to sacrifice space for M.2 slots. Now ATX only has room for 3-4 expansion slots. MicroATX would be reduced to one slot which is the realm of miniITX. Sure you could have more M.2 slots on a microATX form factor vs miniITX but the difference and need for the three sizes is pretty much gone.

Besides most ATX towers were huge because of 5.25 and 3.5 bays. Those are all gone now and ATX builds are now around the same size as hey day microATX builds.

RIP MicroATX.
Posted on Reply
#23
Chaitanya
MysteoaGigabyte already infringe it.
Not anymore, Maingear and Gigabyte have settled the issue with official announcement of Project stealth.
Posted on Reply
#24
WonkoTheSaneUK
trsttteSo next generation will be based around GPU occupying 4 slots? Every AM5 board seen so far seems to be accounting for that :shadedshu:

I hope they don't try to push (and price the products with) X670E on everything with just a couple lower end X670 non-E, I'm yet to see advantages with the dual chipset and I'm already expecting chaos to ensue with the firmware implementation.
Maybe they're being sensible, and allowing for 3-slot GPUs plus room to get cool air into them?
ChaitanyaNot anymore, Maingear and Gigabyte have settled the issue with official announcement of Project stealth.
Indeed. Linus just published a video on Gigabyte's version of Project Stealth, and phoned his contact at Maingear to ask about the patent.
He also pointed out some... issues with Gigabyte's chosen case.
Posted on Reply
#25
JAB Creations
I've have three Gigabyte motherboards that all worked up to the point I upgraded.

WIFI weapon garbage on all four motherboards. :mad: Maybe they're redeemable by having the WIFI chip removable like in laptops.

Also they clearly do not look like finalized products, two audio jacks?

I want to see every PCI-Express slot clearly labels what version and the number of actual lanes (e.g. 4x lanes on a 16x physical slot) and I'll be happy.

They're clearly preview motherboards, it'll be nice to see the finalized versions.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 04:02 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts