Friday, July 1st 2022

AMD Readies More Ryzen 5000X3D Processors?

AMD is looking to expand its Socket AM4 Ryzen 5000X3D processor lineup, according to Greymon55, a reliable source with AMD rumors. The current Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-core processor was well received by the tech-press for its 3D Vertical Cache innovation that significantly improved gaming performance, putting it in the same league as Intel's fastest 12th Gen Core "Alder Lake" processors, despite being based on the older "Zen 3" microarchitecture. AMD uses the same 8-core 3DV Cache chiplet (CCD) in its EPYC "Milan-X" enterprise processors. This lineup could see an expansion, with announcements expected in July.

If true, it could see the introduction of SKUs such as the Ryzen 5 5600X3D, Ryzen 9 5900X3D, or perhaps even the 5950X3D, with the latter two featuring a mind-boggling 200 MB of Total Cache (L2+L3). This would provide a tempting upgrade path to everyone with a Socket AM4 platform, now that AMD has extended official "Zen 3" support to even the oldest AMD 300-series chipset motherboards. There is yet another rumor that predicts AMD could develop certain "Zen 4" SKUs on the AM4 package, which sees a "Zen 4" CCD paired with a current-gen cIOD that has DDR4 and PCIe Gen 4 connectivity. Regardless of which rumor is true, AMD's support for AM4 isn't ending anytime soon.
Source: Greymon55
Add your own comment

121 Comments on AMD Readies More Ryzen 5000X3D Processors?

#1
BlaezaLite
Yes! 5600X3D be under £300 and we have a winner!!!
Posted on Reply
#2
Garrus
That would be awesome! Right now the Canadian price for the 5800X3D is silly. $350 for the 5700X, but $580 for the 5800X3D. That's an extra $230 plus tax for just cache!

I'd like to see a 5600X3D for an extra $100 CAD, like $350 CAD for it...
Posted on Reply
#3
wolf
Better Than Native
5900X3D is a compelling CPU for the duality of content creation/editing etc and gaming, a great mixture of cores for productivity, and that sweet sweet vcache for gaming.
Posted on Reply
#4
ratirt
GarrusThat would be awesome! Right now the Canadian price for the 5800X3D is silly. $350 for the 5700X, but $580 for the 5800X3D. That's an extra $230 plus tax for just cache!

I'd like to see a 5600X3D for an extra $100 CAD, like $350 CAD for it...
$580? That's a steep price where you live. It would seem in Norway you can get it for below 490-510 if you know where to look. Still higher than MSRP but it just came out so no shock there.

5600xt3d should be interesting. I wonder, if there will be any difference between the 5800x3d and 5900x3d. These were almost similar in performance.
Posted on Reply
#5
Pumper
Nice, but I'm afraid of the prices, lol, even the 5800X3D is priced at the level of 5950X.

Either way, it would still be a better option than having to get a new mobo and ram for a AM5 system.
Posted on Reply
#6
Garrus
ratirt$580? That's a steep price where you live. It would seem in Norway you can get it for below 490-510 if you know where to look. Still higher than MSRP but it just came out so no shock there.

5600xt3d should be interesting. I wonder, if there will be any difference between the 5800x3d and 5900x3d. These were almost similar in performance.
Sorry, $580 CAD is $450 USD, the MSRP. My point was that the 5700X is basically the same CPU but without the cache and is only $350 CAD ($270 USD). Hopefully the 5600X3D could have a much smaller price differential.
Posted on Reply
#7
Why_Me
PumperNice, but I'm afraid of the prices, lol, even the 5800X3D is priced at the level of 5950X.

Either way, it would still be a better option than having to get a new mobo and ram for a AM5 system.
And that's why an Intel i7 12700F + B660 board is usually the better option.
Posted on Reply
#8
john_
I can see a 5900X3D or 5950X3D to keep the platform in top spots of gaming charts while also offering excellent multitasking performance. A 5600X3D doesn't make much sense, considering the price hike this model will have because of the extra cost of adding Vcache and the fact that in multitasking will be even more problematic than 5800X3D when comparing it with Intel's models at the same price range.
Posted on Reply
#9
Bomby569
BlaezaYes! 5600X3D be under £300 and we have a winner!!!
a 5600 would make more sense but they seem to be targeting the very high end, something that at least for me makes no sense, that kind of money don't buy yesterday tech
Posted on Reply
#10
BlaezaLite
john_I can see a 5900X3D or 5950X3D to keep the platform in top spots of gaming charts while also offering excellent multitasking performance. A 5600X3D doesn't make much sense, considering the price hike this model will have because of the extra cost of adding Vcache and the fact that in multitasking will be even more problematic than 5800X3D when comparing it with Intel's models at the same price range.
They should do a whole range of X3D processors so even people like myself without £500 for a chip can enjoy extending the life of there platform.
Posted on Reply
#11
john_
BlaezaThey should do a whole range of X3D processors so even people like myself without £500 for a chip can enjoy extending the life of there platform.
No arguing there. I am with you. Would love to get a 5600X3D for 250 euros or less.
I just doubt they would throw Vcache on the 5600. It will also be a kind of internal competition that could lead in lower sales of CPUs that are higher priced than 5600X3D, if that 5600X3D ends up a success.
Seeing people asking "why would I buy the 5800X3D that is much higher priced than 5700X or at the same price as the 5900X and 5950X that offer more cores", it makes me think that people will have second thoughts paying extra for a 6 core CPU that will be much higher prices compared to other 6 core CPUs and in the territory, of 8 or even 10 core CPUs. On the other hand, AMD offering the 5600X3D at a price that is no brainer, will not only lead to plenty of Alder Lake CPUs collecting duct on store selves, but also 5800X and higher AMD's own CPUs collecting the same amount of duct. Not just Zen 3 CPUs, but also Zen 4 CPUs.
Posted on Reply
#12
Shatun_Bear
I would buy a 5900X3D, 12-cores is a logical upgrade for my nearly 4 year old 8-core work system.
Posted on Reply
#13
ratirt
GarrusSorry, $580 CAD is $450 USD, the MSRP. My point was that the 5700X is basically the same CPU but without the cache and is only $350 CAD ($270 USD). Hopefully the 5600X3D could have a much smaller price differential.
Then what you have to do is, buy 5700x but the 5800x3d is much faster in games sensitive to cache. Way faster. So the price can be justified especially if you consider, that in order to achieve this type of performance with Intel's CPU, you have to pay way more than 570CAD (in your case) just for the CPU.
Posted on Reply
#14
SOAREVERSOR
john_No arguing there. I am with you. Would love to get a 5600X3D for 250 euros or less.
I just doubt they would throw Vcache on the 5600. It will also be a kind of internal competition that could lead in lower sales of CPUs that are higher priced than 5600X3D, if that 5600X3D ends up a success.
Seeing people asking "why would I buy the 5800X3D that is much higher priced than 5700X or at the same price as the 5900X and 5950X that offer more cores", it makes me think that people will have second thoughts paying extra for a 6 core CPU that will be much higher prices compared to other 6 core CPUs and in the territory, of 8 or even 10 core CPUs. On the other hand, AMD offering the 5600X3D at a price that is no brainer, will not only lead to plenty of Alder Lake CPUs collecting duct on store selves, but also 5800X and higher AMD's own CPUs collecting the same amount of duct. Not just Zen 3 CPUs, but also Zen 4 CPUs.
It's sort of odd as the 5800X3D isn't really better than the 5800. It's better in gaming, it's at best on par with the it and very often worse by a good margin in content creation.

www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/AMD-Ryzen-5800X3D-vs-5800X-for-Content-Creation-2331/

Gaming doesn't really need all the cores we currently have, yet at least. So if you are doing something that needs over 8 cores you are firmly in the area where X3D is either not going to help or make what you are trying to do worse. This is strictly a gaming stunt. And the types of gamers that would need 10-16 core CPUs, they're doing content creation as well so this isn't really a good buy for them. So if you need the 5900x or 5950x a 5800X3D or 5600X3D isn't going to affect that decision. Along the same lines Alderlake CPUs typically beat the 5800X3D in content creation scores as well.

This is really sort of niche product for people that game and don't do anything heavy lifting outside of it.
Posted on Reply
#15
ratirt
PumperNice, but I'm afraid of the prices, lol, even the 5800X3D is priced at the level of 5950X.

Either way, it would still be a better option than having to get a new mobo and ram for a AM5 system.
the 5800x3d is priced exactly with the same MSRP the 5800x was when launched. So I'm not sure what you are after.
Posted on Reply
#16
SOAREVERSOR
Shatun_BearI would buy a 5900X3D, 12-cores is a logical upgrade for my nearly 4 year old 8-core work system.
Depending on your work though the 5900 is probably faster than the 5900X3D, though the latter would be faster in games.
Posted on Reply
#17
Ruru
S.T.A.R.S.
GarrusThat would be awesome! Right now the Canadian price for the 5800X3D is silly. $350 for the 5700X, but $580 for the 5800X3D. That's an extra $230 plus tax for just cache!

I'd like to see a 5600X3D for an extra $100 CAD, like $350 CAD for it...
The pricing truly sucks when 5800X3D is more expensive than 5900X. And yeah, I know what a beast it is in gaming, but still.
Posted on Reply
#18
Jism
16 core 32 thread with over 200MB of L3 cache. Go AMD!

If they just design a seperate voltage rail for it's cache then we could actually OC the living snot out of it.
Posted on Reply
#19
Ruru
S.T.A.R.S.
Jism16 core 32 thread with over 200MB of L3 cache. Go AMD!

If they just design a seperate voltage rail for it's cache then we could actually OC the living snot out of it.
Though that would be a hard one for older boards' compatibility, I guess?
Posted on Reply
#20
Jism
LenneThough that would be a hard one for older boards' compatibility, I guess?
What incompatibility are you talking about?

The chipset is housed in the CPU. Board is just the interconnect. If your talking about PCI-E 4.0 well yeah then dont stick with a 3x series board.
Posted on Reply
#21
Ruru
S.T.A.R.S.
JismWhat incompatibility are you talking about?

The chipset is housed in the CPU. Board is just the interconnect. If your talking about PCI-E 4.0 well yeah then dont stick with a 3x series board.
About the different voltages for different parts of the CPU. I ain't no expert but at least I think that it would need some redesigning.

And yeah, I know that chipset isn't like it used to be before as the CPU houses about all the logic what a traditional chipset used to handle.
Posted on Reply
#22
Jism
LenneAbout the different voltages for different parts of the CPU. I ain't no expert but at least I think that it would need some redesigning.

And yeah, I know that chipset isn't like it used to be before as the CPU houses about all the logic what a traditional chipset used to handle.
They just downclock to the point the CPU is stable at max 1.35V as it is right now with the 5800X3D. Basicly your getting a 16 core 32 thread but 99.9% with a lower clockspeed.

The problem is the DRAM that is responsible for the additional cache cant cope with voltages higher then 1.35V. It's still connected to the CPU voltage in terms. So as long as they dont design a seperate voltage rail for the DRAM cache, we cant overvolt or really push the chips to it's limits.
Posted on Reply
#23
Ruru
S.T.A.R.S.
JismThey just downclock to the point the CPU is stable at max 1.35V as it is right now with the 5800X3D. Basicly your getting a 16 core 32 thread but 99.9% with a lower clockspeed.

The problem is the DRAM that is responsible for the additional cache cant cope with voltages higher then 1.35V. It's still connected to the CPU voltage in terms. So as long as they dont design a seperate voltage rail for the DRAM cache, we cant overvolt or really push the chips to it's limits.
Alright, I'm not too familiar on the deeper level how CPUs work even though I've been a PC hobbyist for almost 20 years.
Posted on Reply
#24
Jism
Thats just the beauty of AM4 in general. Techpowerup tested as well high end 5950's CPU's in 50$ motherboards. Works flawless. Just not recommended lol.
Posted on Reply
#25
Unregistered
They could've neutralised Alder Lake with Ryzen 9 3D. But it seems they cannot keep up with demand why bother.
Add your own comment
Dec 24th, 2024 22:15 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts