Tuesday, July 19th 2022
NVIDIA RTX 4090 "Ada" Scores Over 19000 in Time Spy Extreme, 66% Faster Than RTX 3090 Ti
NVIDIA's next-generation GeForce RTX 4090 "Ada" flagship graphics card allegedly scores over 19000 points in the 3DMark Time Spy Extreme synthetic benchmark, according to kopite7kimi, a reliable source with NVIDIA leaks. This would put its score around 66 percent above that of the current RTX 3090 Ti flagship. The RTX 4090 is expected to be based on the 5 nm AD102 silicon, with a rumored CUDA core count of 16,384. The higher IPC from the new architecture, coupled with higher clock speeds and power limits, could be contributing to this feat. Time Spy Extreme is a traditional DirectX 12 raster-only benchmark, with no ray traced elements. The Ada graphics architecture is expected to reduce the "cost" of ray tracing (versus raster-only rendering), although we're yet to see leaks of RTX performance, yet.
Sources:
kopite7kimi (Twitter), VideoCardz
96 Comments on NVIDIA RTX 4090 "Ada" Scores Over 19000 in Time Spy Extreme, 66% Faster Than RTX 3090 Ti
not the same CUDA.
Could be 16384 fp32 + 8192 Int32.
10752 is 5376 FP32 + 5376 FP32 or INT32
in most cases 10752 = 8064 FP23 + 2688 INT32
SO it's double FP32 CUDA at 50% higher clock, makes it 3x faster. Memory controller holds it back.
Will keep on waiting I guess...
>250W reference GPU`s should carry an extra anti-green-product tax.
1% tax for each 1W over 250W.
Again my rig has been posted on what it is and how I run it on only 3 fans to keep things cool.
I'm waiting on to see about the newest video cards available from AMD however if I see the prices to continue to drop I just might buy a 6800 or a 6900XT. I'll skip the 6800XT because it runs at 300 watts just the same as the 6900XT and the 6800 runs at 250 watts. If so then I'll undervolt these cards as well. I do think the 6800 is a sleeper card with good overall performance for what it is.
I've got 80 watts to play with too keep my concept of how I keep my overall rig cool, running efficiently with overall good performance.
But if the 7000 series of cards give me overall 30%+ performance at the same wattage of the 6000 series then I would go for that option too. As long as AMD is not going to give me the shaft in pricing then yes it's a definitely a look.
You can also undervolt and get 95 % of the performance for about 70% draw too.
you also don’t need a 200w CPU. You can get more efficient i3s and i5s that draw little power like the good old days. Stick an i7 sticker on the case and 99% wouldn’t be able to tell the difference.
Yet I agree to a point, however in 5 years using north of 500/600 watts to get this much performance will be idiotic and that's a fact.