Wednesday, August 24th 2022
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X "Zen 4" Cinebench R20 Score Leaked
The Cinebench R20 score of an AMD Ryzen 7 7700X "Zen 4" processor (possibly engineering sample), was allegedly leaked to the web by "Extreme Player Hall," a video-format tech news published on Bili Bili, as discovered by 9550pro on Twitter. The 8-core/16-thread processor was shown scoring 773 points in the single-thread test, and 7701 points in the multi-threaded one. These numbers put it 25-30 percent faster than the current Ryzen 7 5800X, as pointed out by Greymon55. The multi-threaded performance of this chip is roughly on par with that of the 5900X, which means AMD is overcoming a 50% CPU core-deficit on the backs of higher IPC and memory bandwidth.
The 25% single-core performance gain over the 5800X, if extrapolated to other less-parallized workloads such as gaming, could put this processor about 5-10% ahead of the 5800X3D, and about 4-9% ahead of the Core i9-12900K. The 7700X could face an uphill task measuring up to "Raptor Lake" in multi-threaded tests, given that Intel is doubling down on its Hybrid Architecture, with more E-cores across the lineup. AMD may still have a crack at matching Raptor Lake's gaming performance with future variants that have 3DV Cache.
Sources:
Extreme Player (Bili Bili), HXL (Twitter)
The 25% single-core performance gain over the 5800X, if extrapolated to other less-parallized workloads such as gaming, could put this processor about 5-10% ahead of the 5800X3D, and about 4-9% ahead of the Core i9-12900K. The 7700X could face an uphill task measuring up to "Raptor Lake" in multi-threaded tests, given that Intel is doubling down on its Hybrid Architecture, with more E-cores across the lineup. AMD may still have a crack at matching Raptor Lake's gaming performance with future variants that have 3DV Cache.
44 Comments on AMD Ryzen 7 7700X "Zen 4" Cinebench R20 Score Leaked
AMD fanboys: See! Awesome!
Intel fanboys: Behind Intel. AMD fail!
Sweet! Enjoying my 7700X ahem 12600K here...
But on the Ryzen 7 7700x, sad that it's on R20 because that thing is probably just super fast to render and it could just be short boost. Maybe not. Also that gain cannot be put on the AVX 512 support as neither R20 or R23 support it.
Can't wait to see more results there. They match it but i would prefer a cpu with 8 real core than one with 6 good and 4 bad. Not sure if Raptor lake will make me change my mind on that.
On a side note, neither R20 or R23 use AVX 512 so it's not what is causing the IPC gain there. we will have to see more benchmark to see how it perform but it's looking great for Zen 4 X3D.
Ah, maybe that's why there's no "800" CPU. Maybe it will be the Ryzen 7 7800X3D???
I actually prefer the e-cores since they soak up garbage background threads. That separation makes a noticeable performance difference.
Works great when listening to youtube/spotify and having stuff open while gaming.
Intel i5 12600K Review vs. AMD Ryzen - 10 Cores?! - YouTube
Zen4 X3D I bet will come early if raptor lake is fast enough. Hopefully that's the case -- since that is where the real zen 4 performance is. They're releasing the cache-less chips now to milk the market a bit.
X3D is just so fast... not sure why intel isn't trying to develop stacked cache (probably because they can't yeet their processors to 500W with it), it's such an amazing tech.
Excited for this launch though - cant wait to see reviews @ DDR5 6000
It will be impressive to see Zen4 CPUs with fewer cores, running with an air cooler and still beating "DogLake" 350w TDP chiller+ edition CPUs.
Who really cares if the 12600K has 6 cores? What if the 13600K had 4 super p cores and a truck load of waste of sand cores and performed like crazy in games and in MT?
Practically the future is the big little concept. You don’t really need many cores for gaming. Only a few and ridiculously fast. The opposite in MT.
….and Intel is already there. AMD will need to make the jump into it in Zen 5.
on topic, the 7700X numbers are very promising but it has to be priced accordingly. The 12600K has the same numbers almost a year now…
I want someone to come up with a CPU that has adderall cores, once the cores are active they don't stop and refuse to let your computer go into sleep mode. Maybe some beer muscle cores, cores that think they offer performance but give out about 1/4 of the way to peak frequency.
Regular consumer CPUs might lose some in multi threaded because of the shear amount of power pumped into Intel CPUs.
X3D model(s) will dominate the gaming market.
And the Zen4 server products will keep its dominance.
If it's indicative it will give something like the below in CB23 multithreading if they squeeze every ounce of 230W:
7950X 37130
7900X 29110
7700X 19820
7600X 15170
Intel Raptor should look something like the below:
i9 13900K 38940
i7 13700K 28540
i5 13600K 22890
i5 13400 16050
AMD just can't compete with the old pricing ($799-299) level!