Wednesday, November 23rd 2022

Announcing the TechPowerUp SSD Specs Database

by
btarunr
 Discuss (215 Comments)
We are announcing the latest addition to our PC enthusiast databases, the new TechPowerUp SSD Specs Database. Modeled along the lines of our immensely popular GPU Database, CPU Database, and hardware Reviews Database, the new SSD Specs Database, curated by Gabriel Ferraz, aims to be a definitive repository of information on solid-state drive (SSD) hardware specs, for all to freely access. Here, you'll find a growing collection of client SSD hardware specs across all relevant form-factors and information. The database also helps you identify multiple hardware revisions of the same SSD model, so you're aware of any bait-and-switch incidents, or vague specs by manufacturers.

The TechPowerUp SSD Specs Database has individual info pages on each capacity variant of an SSD model; besides any hardware variants it may have. You can have quick, actionable information on specs such as controller, NAND flash, DRAM cache, advanced NAND flash specs, interface, protocol, controller hardware specs, and known performance numbers from our testing. We are constantly adding new drives to this database, and you can help us grow, not just by suggesting improvements to the database itself, but for additions to the database, please reach out to the curator on the main page. But for now, enjoy what we've built for you!

TechPowerUp SSD Specs Database

Related News

Add your own comment

215 Comments on Announcing the TechPowerUp SSD Specs Database

#2
GabrielLP14
SSD DB Maintainer
Loved it.

I hope you guys enjoy our new project, thanks again @W1zzard for having all the patience to helping me out solving some details we had to fix along the way but it was an amazing opportunity to work with you guys.
Now let's focus ahead of us and make this DB even bigger :D
Posted on Reply
#3
seccentral
this
is
great
will become even better as more entries are added
Posted on Reply
#4
Dobermann
so much usefull info in one place, thank you!
Posted on Reply
#6
GabrielLP14
SSD DB Maintainer
rusTORKSo, SSD-Z? =)
can't say for sure but i don't think we're bringing it back, since we already have more software tools for each controller manufacturers. Sure, some we don't like SK Hynix, Samsung, but for the most we do which is enough already
Posted on Reply
#7
MachineLearning
GabrielLP14Loved it.

I hope you guys enjoy our new project, thanks again @W1zzard for having all the patience to helping me out solving some details we had to fix along the way but it was an amazing opportunity to work with you guys.
Now let's focus ahead of us and make this DB even bigger :D
Thank you for your hard work.
Are you interested in receiving DB additions in this thread?
Posted on Reply
#8
GabrielLP14
SSD DB Maintainer
MachineLearningThank you for your hard work.
Are you interested in receiving DB additions in this thread?
of course :D
Posted on Reply
#10
dj-electric
So, how will the database display different component configurations for the same drive model, say ADATA XPG SX8200
Posted on Reply
#11
GabrielLP14
SSD DB Maintainer
dj-electricSo, how will the database display different component configurations for the same drive model, say ADATA XPG SX8200


Just bear in mind that these are the VLO i could find, there are probably more out there, so we'll need help from whoever is interested in helping to map it out
Posted on Reply
#13
GabrielLP14
SSD DB Maintainer
cowcatwithahatAwesome addition! This will be very useful.
Thank you :D
Posted on Reply
#14
Valent117
idk how you will fill this giant database, but maybe it could be interesting to release a tool (ahem ssd Z) everyone can launch and it will compare our ssd to the database and send you the missing data, 2/4 of my current ssd aren't showing in the db lol
Posted on Reply
#15
MachineLearning
Valent117idk how you will fill this giant database, but maybe it could be interesting to release a tool (ahem ssd Z) everyone can launch and it will compare our ssd to the database and send you the missing data, 2/4 of my current ssd aren't showing in the db lol
I think this is a fair suggestion, it will be time-consuming to fill the database manually. However I wonder if the time it would take to create such a program outweighs its benefit. For example, it would have to accurately identify most NAND to really be useful. Idk how hard that is to implement.
Posted on Reply
#17
GabrielLP14
SSD DB Maintainer
Valent117idk how you will fill this giant database, but maybe it could be interesting to release a tool (ahem ssd Z) everyone can launch and it will compare our ssd to the database and send you the missing data, 2/4 of my current ssd aren't showing in the db lol
I understand but that tool unfortunately is ancient and even when it was active AFAIK wasn't reporting data precisely

Here you can use many tools for different controllers to find information.
vlo.name:3000/ssdtool/
MachineLearningI think this is a fair suggestion, it will be time-consuming to fill the database manually. However I wonder if the time it would take to create such a program outweighs its benefit. For example, it would have to accurately identify most NAND to really be useful. Idk how hard that is to implement.
Check the link above, there some scripts online to do that, and it's possible through NVMe-CLI
Posted on Reply
#19
b1k3rdude
Noice, but can I make a feature request? would be nice to have a random 4k QD1 r/w, w/block size filter also.
Posted on Reply
#20
GabrielLP14
SSD DB Maintainer
b1k3rdudeNoice, but can I make a feature request? would be nice to half a random 4k QD1 r/w filter also.
The issue is that many website uses different test platform, so it won't be fair to use SSD X results vs SSD Z results from a different test system
Not only that but very few manufacturers share these numbers
We could try to add the results from our benchs but would be literally a few hundreds at the most, and the SSD DB has 1200 SSDs
Posted on Reply
#21
b1k3rdude
Fair comment.

My issue with IOPS are -
  • CystalDiskMark displays 4k QD1 by default for random r/w's and thats a metric that I and I assume others have relied and tested with for years.
  • Are the IOPS figures TPU (and the industry in general) are using ALWAYS based on the 4K block size? otherwise the IOPS figures are meaningless.
Posted on Reply
#22
Wirko
A tiny bit of self promotion won't hurt anyone.

I also fixed the capitalisation here, it's "Techpowerup" in the database.
Posted on Reply
#23
AsRock
TPU addict
I hope some ones watching out for those pesky manufactures who make bad change's to them too, or even added to the item that changed so it puts a red flag on it of sorts.


Nice to see some thing new here.
Posted on Reply
#24
GabrielLP14
SSD DB Maintainer
b1k3rdudeFair comment.

My issue with IOPS are -
  • CystalDiskMark displays 4k QD1 by default for random r/w's and thats a metric that I and I assume others have relied and tested with for years.
  • Are the IOPS figures TPU (and the industry in general) are using ALWAYS based on the 4K block size? otherwise the IOPS figures are meaningless.
Yes but different test systems affect performance. OS build ans version as well. Without the same metric 2 results from 2 diferents platforms are almost useless
WirkoA tiny bit of self promotion won't hurt anyone.

I also fixed the capitalisation here, it's "Techpowerup" in the database.
Hahaha i understand, and yes i also review SSDs but in my YouTube Channel in Brazil, i started a GOOGLE SHEETs database in 2019 then i met Wizzard in 2021 and started this project.
AsRockI hope some ones watching out for those pesky manufactures who make bad change's to them too, or even added to the item that changed so it puts a red flag on it of sorts.


Nice to see some thing new here.
Oh i live and breath SSDs ahhaah, all jokes aside, i'm always looking for it since i not only do the DB but also review SSDs
Posted on Reply
#25
xlen
Welp this just killed the need for my database, especially if you will maintain it. :D
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 5th, 2024 21:35 EST change timezone

Latest GPU Drivers

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts