Saturday, March 11th 2023

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Allegedly Launches on April 13

It has been pretty much confirmed that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 (non-Ti) is launching in April, but now, the rumored date has been specified as April 13th. The latest report comes from a well known leaker, hongxing2020, over at Twitter, who has a pretty good track record and had correct dates for RTX 30 and RTX 40 series launch dates. In case you missed it, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is based on the same AD104 GPU as the RTX 4070 Ti, with slightly fewer cores, but still comes with the same memory specification as the Ti version.

This means the GeForce RTX 4070 should feature 46 streaming multiprocessors (SMs) which should leave it with 5,888 CUDA cores enabled. It will come with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit memory interface. The TDP is rumored at 200 W. There were some rumors that NVIDIA could have three different SKUs for the RTX 4070, with 16 GB, 12 GB, and 10 GB of VRAM, but so far, this has just remained as a vague rumor coming from Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC) regulatory filings. NVIDIA is slowly completing the RTX 40 series lineup, so hopefully we will not have to wait too long for updates on the RTX 4060 Ti and the RTX 4060. NVIDIA, and its founder and CEO, Jensen Huang, will be holding the opening keynote at GTC on March 21st, so we could get at least some updates for the future GeForce lineup.
Sources: hongxing2020 (Twitter), via Videocardz
Add your own comment

57 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Allegedly Launches on April 13

#51
Chrispy_
fevgatosBut my comparison wasn't done on msrp but on actual products sold throughout Europe using sites like idealo and geizhals. The 4070ti was pretty instantly at 929 while the xt was at least 100 euros higher. Anyways...
Clearly, no. You were arguing performance/$ at MSRP as per Techspot's review. If you didnt' want to argue performance/$ at MSRP, perhaps you should have cited a different source?

You can't just choose different, historic pricing from 2 months ago in this week's news article to support your stance, especially not when the price is part of the data you're arguing (performance/MSRP-cost).
Posted on Reply
#52
JustBenching
Chrispy_You were arguing performance/$ at MSRP as per Techspot's review. If you didnt' want to argue performance/$ at MSRP, perhaps you should have cited a different source?
Ι indeed was, but both techspots and even techpowerups msrps for both the 4070ti and the 7900xt was equally apart from reality for both. The graph you posted from techppowerup for example had the 4070ti at 800 - real price was 929 - that's a 16% increase. They had the 7900xt at 900 - real price was 1029 / 1049 - thats a difference of 15%. So their price to performance graphs were pretty accurate.
Posted on Reply
#53
Chrispy_
fevgatosΙ indeed was, but both techspots and even techpowerups msrps for both the 4070ti and the 7900xt was equally apart from reality for both. The graph you posted from techppowerup for example had the 4070ti at 800 - real price was 929 - that's a 16% increase. They had the 7900xt at 900 - real price was 1029 / 1049 - thats a difference of 15%. So their price to performance graphs were pretty accurate.
Why are you using that word "was" again.
Those "real" prices you're talking about aren't the real prices now. This is a news article from this week, not 9 weeks ago.
Posted on Reply
#54
Why_Me
medi01People should not settle for anything less than "super puper" this gen, given the price on those things.

Maybe even "super puper duper" is worth waiting for.


Sure, John:

Anyone with an IQ knows the 4070 Ti 12GB is geared for gaming at 1440P. If you choose to game at 4K then get a card meant for gaming at 4K.
Posted on Reply
#55
medi01
Why_MeAnyone with an IQ knows the 4070 Ti 12GB is geared for gaming at 1440P. If you choose to game at 4K then get a card meant for gaming at 4K.
That a card faster than 3090Ti is a 1440p card.

Of course, genius. :kookoo: :D

And even that crappy "better perf / $" comes when actual street price is ignored.
Posted on Reply
#56
JustBenching
medi01And even that crappy "better perf / $" comes when actual street price is ignored.
Wrong. It had the better raster performance / $ at launch up until a couple of weeks ago. That's not taking into account the better RT, better power draw, FG etc
Posted on Reply
#57
medi01
fevgatosIt had the better raster performance / $ at launch
The chart posted above is how things were at launch EVEN if you take faux MSRP at face value.
fevgatosbetter power draw
It is about 10% behind 7900 XT and consumes roughly 10% less power.

fevgatosbetter RT
"Better", right? Not "faster"?

Anyhow. Now that we know that "FPS with RT on drops, because not enough RT cores" is a lie (with even 4000 series dropping of 40%-ish with RT on), it also becomes obvious, that "RT advantage" is largely a war of "who sponsored more games with RT gimmick"

And even that is relevant only to those folks, who care about RT gimmickl.

fevgatosFG
There is no proper use case for frame generation, something that TVs are doing with crappy hardware they have for more than a decade, but even that will get addressed shortly by AMD.
fevgatosetc
There is no "etc", unless you mean "8 GB less RAM".
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 19th, 2024 10:56 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts