Monday, August 28th 2023

AMD Ryzen 8000 "Granite Ridge" Desktop CPUs Could Utilize Same IO Die as Ryzen 7000

AMD is aiming to launch its Ryzen 8000 desktop CPUs, codenamed "Granite Ridge," at some point next year. The next generation Zen 5 core microarchitecture is expected to arrive alongside (Navi) RDNA 3.5 iGPU cores according to the last batch of Team Red product roadmaps. Today, hardware tipsters Olrak29_ and Kepler_L2 have made claims on social media that part of the Ryzen 7000 CPU legacy will continue with the succeeding desktop processor lineup—we already know that Granite Ridge will exist as a Socket AM5 package, but today's leak proposes that these next-gen chips are lined up to utilize the same IO die as sported by AMD's current Zen 4 desktop family.

These new rumors suggest that the "reused" Ryzen 7000 IOD (I/O Die) chiplet will grant the familiar allocation of 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, memory controllers, USB functions, plus RDNA 2 iGPU cores. Wccftech points out that: "...interestingly, AMD lists the Ryzen 7000 "desktop" CPUs with Navi 3.0 support whereas the Radeon 710M iGPU in fact is based on the RDNA 2 graphics core. The next-gen lineup was mentioned to support the newest RDNA 3.5 GPU core which will be coming to the Strix APU family next year but that isn't the case either." The article proposes that "RDNA 3.5 GPU cores on the AM5 platform" could arrive with the advent of upcoming Ryzen APUs—namely 6 nm Rembrandt (6000G) and 4 nm Phoenix (7000G) desktop solutions.
Sources: Wccftech, Olrak29_ Tweet, Kepler_L2 Tweet
Add your own comment

88 Comments on AMD Ryzen 8000 "Granite Ridge" Desktop CPUs Could Utilize Same IO Die as Ryzen 7000

#76
R0H1T
If you need the most efficient processor at MT workloads then buy a 7950x ~ we've been over this & I'm sure you disagree but the vast majority of reviews show AMD is the clear winner there!
Posted on Reply
#77
AusWolf
fevgatosThe 13900k is indeed a power hog in games, that's why I don't have it anymore, went back to my 12900k. But it needs to be said that also the 13900k is incredibly efficient in productivity unless for some reason you decide to run it power unlimited at 300 watts. But why would you do that is beyond me. It's the 2nd most efficient cpu in Mt workloads so...
Are you sure?
Posted on Reply
#78
fevgatos
AusWolfAre you sure?
Yes, I am sure. You are doing exactly what I said. The test is done with unlimited power. Yes, if you are allowing the cpu to draw 500w it's not efficient.
R0H1TIf you need the most efficient processor at MT workloads then buy a 7950x ~ we've been over this & I'm sure you disagree but the vast majority of reviews show AMD is the clear winner there!
According to the graph just posted, it is not. The 5950x smacks the 7950x by a lot

When you are power limit it to 125w,the 13900k scores 32600 pts, making it the most efficient cpu on the graph with 260pts per watt
Posted on Reply
#79
AusWolf
fevgatosYes, I am sure. You are doing exactly what I said. The test is done with unlimited power. Yes, if you are allowing the cpu to draw 500w it's not efficient.
No, it wasn't. The green bar is at stock. Power limiting is a thing on any CPU, so it isn't an argument unless you power limit every CPU included in the test.

Also, @Chippendale's question/suggestion was about gaming. I don't understand why you keep moving the goalposts, unless your intention is to create yet another pointless blue vs red penis measuring contest.
Posted on Reply
#80
fevgatos
AusWolfNo, it wasn't. The green bar is at stock. Power limiting is a thing on any CPU, so it isn't an argument unless you power limit every CPU included in the test.
At stock it's power unlimited. Yes you can power limit any cpu. If you do that you'll realize the 13900k is the 2nd most efficient cpu in Mt workloads and the most efficient in st workloads.
Posted on Reply
#81
AusWolf
fevgatosAt stock it's power unlimited. Yes you can power limit any cpu. If you do that you'll realize the 13900k is the 2nd most efficient cpu in Mt workloads and the most efficient in st workloads.
No, it's not. It's limited to 253 W. You can power limit any CPU to any W, and it'll be way more efficient than it is at stock.

It's not a valid argument, and has no connection to anything mentioned here earlier, so stop moving the goalposts.
Posted on Reply
#82
fevgatos
AusWolfNo, it's not. It's limited to 253 W. You can power limit any CPU to any W, and it'll be way more efficient than it is at stock.

It's not a valid argument, and has no connection to anything mentioned here earlier, so stop moving the goalposts.
No, you are actually wrong. Go check the review, it pulled 283w on cbr23.

Yes, it is a very valid argument. Indeed you can power limit any cpu. When you power limit all of them to the same wattage, the 13900k is the 2nd most efficient cpu in Mt performance. Why are you contesting this is beyond me to be fair.
Posted on Reply
#83
AusWolf
fevgatosNo, you are actually wrong. Go check the review, it pulled 283w on cbr23.

Yes, it is a very valid argument. Indeed you can power limit any cpu. When you power limit all of them to the same wattage, the 13900k is the 2nd most efficient cpu in Mt performance. Why are you contesting this is beyond me to be fair.
There was a question/suggestion about a mixed gaming/idle power consumption scenario. I calculated the approximate answers. Why you feel you need to prove anything is beyond me.

You know what? Let's stop it here. The original question has been answered. I see no point in further answering to whatever imaginary situation you come up with just to make the 13900K look better than it is.
Posted on Reply
#84
fevgatos
AusWolfThere was a question/suggestion about a mixed gaming/idle power consumption scenario. I calculated the approximate answers. Why you feel you need to prove anything is beyond me.

You know what? Let's stop it here. The original question has been answered. I see no point in further answering to whatever imaginary situation you come up with just to make the 13900K look better than it is.
There is no imaginary situation. According to the graph you yourself posted the 7950x is handily losing in efficiency to the 5950x. That's not because it's less efficient, it's because it's tuned out of the box to draw a lot more power
Posted on Reply
#85
AusWolf
fevgatosThere is no imaginary situation. According to the graph you yourself posted the 7950x is handily losing in efficiency to the 5950x. That's not because it's less efficient, it's because it's tuned out of the box to draw a lot more power
You're comparing stock values on one CPU to a power limited scenario on another. This is utterly pointless and stupid. I'm out.
Posted on Reply
#86
fevgatos
AusWolfYou're comparing stock values on one CPU to a power limited scenario on another. This is utterly pointless and stupid. I'm out.
Nope, the graph you posted is stock values on both the 7950x and the 5950x. So zen 4 is way less efficient than zen 3 according to the graph.
Posted on Reply
#87
AusWolf
fevgatosNope, the graph you posted is stock values on both the 7950x and the 5950x. So zen 4 is way less efficient than zen 3 according to the graph.
Where did the 5950X come from now? :wtf: Never mind. This conversation is petty and childish, and I'm going to bed. Bye.
Posted on Reply
#88
fevgatos
AusWolfWhere did the 5950X come from now? :wtf: Never mind. This conversation is petty and childish, and I'm going to bed. Bye.
The 5950x came from your graph. You posted it..
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jul 5th, 2024 18:19 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts