Thursday, November 9th 2023

Micron Announces 128GB DRAM Low-Latency, High-Capacity RDIMMs

Micron Technology, Inc. (Nasdaq: MU), today demonstrated its industry leadership by announcing its 32Gb monolithic die-based 128 GB DDR5 RDIMM memory featuring best-in-class performance of up to 8000 MT/s to support data center workloads today and into the future. These high-capacity, high-speed memory modules are engineered to meet the performance and data-handling needs of a wide range of mission-critical applications in data center and cloud environments, including artificial intelligence (AI), in-memory databases (IMDBs) and efficient processing for multithreaded, multicore count general compute workloads.

Powered by Micron's industry-leading 1β (1-beta) technology, the 32Gb DDR5 DRAM die-based 128 GB DDR5 RDIMM memory delivers the following enhancements over competitive 3DS through-silicon via (TSV) products:
  • more than 45% improved bit density
  • up to 24% improved energy efficiency
  • up to 16% lower latency
  • up to a 28% improvement in AI training performance
"We are proud to set a new standard for high-capacity, high-speed memory in the data center with Micron's 128 GB DDR5 RDIMMs, which delivers the memory bandwidth and capacity required for increasingly compute-intensive workloads," said Praveen Vaidyanathan, vice president and general manager of Micron's Compute Products Group. "Micron continues to enable improvements to the data center ecosystem with early access to our advanced technologies and support in the design and integration of leading-edge high-capacity memory solutions."

Micron's 32Gb DDR5 memory solution uses innovative die architecture choices for leading array efficiency and the densest monolithic DRAM die. Voltage domain and refresh management features help optimize the power delivery network providing much-needed energy efficiency improvements. Additionally, the die-dimension aspect ratio was optimized to advance the manufacturing efficiency of the 32Gb high-capacity DRAM die.

By leveraging AI-powered smart manufacturing methods to enable these world-class innovations, Micron's 1β process technology node has achieved yield maturity in the fastest time in the company's history. Micron's 128 GB RDIMMs will be shipping in platforms capable of 4800 MT/s, 5600 MT/s, and 6400 MT/s in 2024 and designed into future platforms capable of up to 8000MT/s.

"Our latest 4th Gen AMD EPYC processors will benefit from optimized memory capacity per core with Micron's 128 GB RDIMMs, which use 32Gb monolithic DRAM to provide an improved total cost of ownership solution for business-critical data enterprise workloads, such as AI, high-performance computing and virtualization," said Dan McNamara, senior vice president and general manager, Server Business Unit, AMD. "As AMD advances compute with our next-gen EPYC processors, Micron's 128 GB RDIMMs will likely become one of the main memory options to deliver high-capacity and bandwidth per core capabilities to address the demands of memory-intensive applications."

"We look forward to Micron's 32Gb-based 128 GB RDIMM for the bandwidth and performance-per-watt solution benefits available in the server and AI systems market. Intel is evaluating this 32Gb memory offering for key DDR5 server platforms based on the resulting total cost of ownership benefits to cloud, AI and enterprise customers," said Dr. Dimitrios Ziakas, vice president of Intel's Memory and IO Technologies.

Micron 32Gb-DRAM die enables future expansion of the memory portfolio with enhanced bandwidth and energy-efficient MCRDIMM and JEDEC standard MRDIMM products in 128 GB, 256 GB and higher capacity solutions. With industry-leading process and design technology innovations, Micron offers a wide array of memory options across RDIMMs, MCRDIMMs, MRDIMMs, CXL and LP form factors to allow customers to integrate optimized solutions for AI and high-performance computing (HPC) applications that suit their needs for bandwidth, capacity and power optimization. For more information, visit Micron's DDR5 webpage.
Source: Micron
Add your own comment

22 Comments on Micron Announces 128GB DRAM Low-Latency, High-Capacity RDIMMs

#1
gmn17
Is this RAM compatible with threadripper zen 4 too?
Posted on Reply
#3
Aquinus
Resident Wat-man
iameatingjamNot for us plebs with consumer parts?
I would be very curious to know what "consumer" needs 256Gb of RAM, because nobody is running a single channel (or two sub-channels,) of this stuff. Registered DIMMs would suggest more than that too, so think at least 512Gb.
Posted on Reply
#4
iameatingjam
AquinusI would be very curious to know what "consumer" needs 256Gb of RAM, because nobody is running a single channel (or two sub-channels,) of this stuff. Registered DIMMs would suggest more than that too, so think at least 512Gb.
Geeze, let us dream would you?
Posted on Reply
#5
Aquinus
Resident Wat-man
iameatingjamGeeze, let us dream would you?
Sorry, I'm a realist. I have 64Gb in my laptop that I daily drive and the workloads I put on it that push it to the limit is not what the typical consumer is doing.
Posted on Reply
#6
iameatingjam
AquinusSorry, I'm a realist. I have 64Gb in my laptop that I daily drive and the workloads I put on it that push it to the limit is not what the typical consumer is doing.
Yes I agree with you. I only have 32gb and thats been more than enough. But I have been curious about that app that lets you use excess dram as a cache for ssds. primocache I think its called. That would be fun to use with 256gb of ram. And yes I know windows does this already but only with a very small amount.
Posted on Reply
#7
thestryker6
gmn 17Is this RAM compatible with threadripper zen 4 too?
It ought to be because these are just standard RDIMMs it's the MCRDIMMs that will be Intel exclusive.
Posted on Reply
#8
Minus Infinity
iameatingjamYes I agree with you. I only have 32gb and thats been more than enough. But I have been curious about that app that lets you use excess dram as a cache for ssds. primocache I think its called. That would be fun to use with 256gb of ram. And yes I know windows does this already but only with a very small amount.
Anybody that uses Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop knows 32GB doesn't cut the mustard. Adobe still haven't fixed the memory leak in LR, leave it open for a more than 10 minutes and it'll get up to 18-20GB of memory usage doing nothing. 64GB is my new default, but 128GB would be sweet especially if I start doing video. processing.
Posted on Reply
#9
iameatingjam
Minus InfinityAnybody that uses Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop knows 32GB doesn't cut the mustard. Adobe still haven't fixed the memory leak in LR, leave it open for a more than 10 minutes and it'll get up to 18-20GB of memory usage doing nothing. 64GB is my new default, but 128GB would be sweet especially if I start doing video. processing.
You know, a memory leak was the exact reason I first upgraded from 16 to 32gb of ram. Not adobe or anything, Xenoblade Chronicles 3. It would always eventually crash, 32gb doubled the amount of time until the crash. And certainly productivity tasks need more ram.
Posted on Reply
#11
R-T-B
AquinusSorry, I'm a realist. I have 64Gb in my laptop that I daily drive and the workloads I put on it that push it to the limit is not what the typical consumer is doing.
Chromium compiles love such a config.
Posted on Reply
#12
Aquinus
Resident Wat-man
R-T-BChromium compiles love such a config.
I actually mainly got it for my job at the time since I was a contractor and the software suite I was working on required having several JVMs running at the same time and I very quickly hit swap space with 16GB. Since a lot of laptops these days have soldered DRAM, I just maxed it out. If I were buying a new MBP for the same reason today, I'd get one of those M3 Max chips with 128GB because you can't replace it and I don't like replacing hardware on a regular basis. If I go for it, I go all in. Even more so if you're using it for you livelihood.
Posted on Reply
#13
R-T-B
AquinusI actually mainly got it for my job at the time since I was a contractor and the software suite I was working on required having several JVMs running at the same time and I very quickly hit swap space with 16GB. Since a lot of laptops these days have soldered DRAM, I just maxed it out. If I were buying a new MBP for the same reason today, I'd get one of those M3 Max chips with 128GB because you can't replace it and I don't like replacing hardware on a regular basis. If I go for it, I go all in. Even more so if you're using it for you livelihood.
Yeah I have a lenovo Thinkpad T14s I use at work and I made a mistake opting for the 16GB config. It's still usable since I mostly remote in to things, but, if I want to locally do any kind of highend dev work it's useless.
Posted on Reply
#14
Aquinus
Resident Wat-man
R-T-BYeah I have a lenovo Thinkpad T14s I use at work and I made a mistake opting for the 16GB config. It's still usable since I mostly remote in to things, but, if I want to locally do any kind of highend dev work it's useless.
I was using an HP Spectre with 16GB before I upgraded to the MBP in my specs. Big leap for a mobile device. I use it for just about everything.
Posted on Reply
#15
R-T-B
AquinusI was using an HP Spectre with 16GB before I upgraded to the MBP in my specs. Big leap for a mobile device. I use it for just about everything.
I'll probably have to replace this sooner than later, shame the days of just having a SODIMM slot are gone, but thin and light is a thing yeah.

My dad will like it as a hand me down. He can't stand touchpads without physical buttons.
Posted on Reply
#16
Aquinus
Resident Wat-man
R-T-BI'll probably have to replace this sooner than later, shame the days of just having a SODIMM slot are gone, but thin and light is a thing yeah.

My dad will like it as a hand me down. He can't stand touchpads without physical buttons.
My parents are plenty savvy. They have a Macbook Air with an M1 chip that they like, plus an i7 2600k machine I built for them a very long time ago that my father still uses when he needs Windows. I never tried overclocking it to be honest. It probably could do 5Ghz. :roll:
Posted on Reply
#17
R-T-B
AquinusMy parents are plenty savvy. They have a Macbook Air with an M1 chip that they like, plus an i7 2600k machine I built for them a very long time ago that my father still uses when he needs Windows. I never tried overclocking it to be honest. It probably could do 5Ghz. :roll:
My father would never touch a desktop. Ironically for his age, he's reasonably sensible re web habits and doesn't really need help there, but man he has weird taste in what he "requires" for his computer interfaces.

For years he used an old beat to shit Panasonic Toughbook with a Core Duo CPU because and I quote "it has a handle." Took years to make him realize that is not the norm, lol.
Posted on Reply
#18
Aquinus
Resident Wat-man
R-T-BMy father would never touch a desktop. Ironically for his age, he's reasonably sensible re web habits and doesn't really need help there, but man he has weird taste in what he "requires" for his computer interfaces.

For years he used an old beat to shit Panasonic Toughbook with a Core Duo CPU because and I quote "it has a handle." Took years to make him realize that is not the norm, lol.
My father is just a cheap bastard. :laugh: He got the MBP second hand on the cheap and I'm pretty sure the air is the 8GB version, which is fine for my mother who mainly uses her iPad. I managed to sell them on the tower because I told them that it would last. Well, it's a SB chip and it's just chugging along. Only change I made to it after the fact was adding an SSD when they got cheaper. Actually I think I did that for their MBP too. Good 'ol Crucial.
Posted on Reply
#19
Minus Infinity
Well Apple are cheap bastards too, trying to defend 8GB in a $1600US Macbook Pro as fine and as good as 16GB on Windows. Honestly they are just dicks. 8GB isn't even acceptable on a Macbook Air.
Posted on Reply
#20
Aquinus
Resident Wat-man
Minus InfinityWell Apple are cheap bastards too, trying to defend 8GB in a $1600US Macbook Pro as fine and as good as 16GB on Windows. Honestly they are just dicks. 8GB isn't even acceptable on a Macbook Air.
Totally agree. Apple should be shipping with 16GB for base models.
Posted on Reply
#21
ypsylon
I'm afraid to look for the price given you need to sell couple vital body parts for 8*64GB right now. ;) Gosh pricing of ECC DDR5 really is joy killer compared to previous platforms, 65% more expensive than DDR4. Where I live getting 32GB sticks is pointless as there is like ~35USD equivalent price difference vs 64GB. (also Micron)

Folks who say I have 16/32/64 and I'm fine. Yes you are. Clearly this kind of memory is not for you. Go into serious 3D, particle physics, fluid dynamics, DB servers etc and its basically:

How much memory do you need?
Yes.

I also thought I'll be fine with 64 at one time. Enough to say in last scene I've done with 25 characters that was about 80GB of character geometry without rest of the scene. So yes, there is plenty of applications for 128GB memory sticks, even at home studio, not to mention corporate IT.
Posted on Reply
#22
ir_cow
Minus InfinityAnybody that uses Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop knows 32GB doesn't cut the mustard. Adobe still haven't fixed the memory leak in LR, leave it open for a more than 10 minutes and it'll get up to 18-20GB of memory usage doing nothing. 64GB is my new default, but 128GB would be sweet especially if I start doing video. processing.
I don't about LR memory leak, I have LR and PS open for hours at a time no issues. Or PS, After Effects, Premiere, and illustrator going because real-time editing between programs is amazing! But yeah, 64GB is mandatory. Have 96GB in right now, which is enough for what I'm doing. I can see the us for 256GB easily for the right users.
Minus InfinityWell Apple are cheap bastards too, trying to defend 8GB in a $1600US Macbook Pro as fine and as good as 16GB on Windows. Honestly they are just dicks. 8GB isn't even acceptable on a Macbook Air.
Not to mention the ram is soldered the MB, so no upgrades for you :)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 19th, 2024 09:10 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts