Friday, May 31st 2024

AMD Shuffles Feature-sets of its 800-series Chipset, X870 is B650E Successor

AMD is debuting its Ryzen 9000 series "Granite Ridge" desktop processors powered by the "Zen 5" microarchitecture later this year. These chips are compatible with existing AMD 600-series chipset motherboards with a simple UEFI firmware update, but the company is also taking the opportunity to launch the AMD 800-series chipset family alongside these chips. The lineup will be led by the AMD X870E, followed by the X870. These two chipsets should launch immediately alongside the new processors, but will later be joined by the AMD B850 and B840. There's no entry-level chipset planned, the AMD A620 will continue to hold the fort for AMD here. There is an interesting new mix of product differentiation, according to a leaked GIGABYTE slide scored by VideoCardz.

If you recall, the X670E and X670 were differentiated by a lack of Gen 5 PCI-Express x16 PEG slots on the X670, which instead was limited to Gen 4 on the PEG slot. The X670 still had Gen 5 NVMe slots attached to the CPU, and had practically the same I/O features as the X670E, including the same counts of downstream PCIe Gen 4 general purpose lanes. Both the X670E and X670 are 2-chip solutions, in that the second chip is a connected to the general purpose PCIe lanes of the first chip, which in turn is connected to the processor. Things are going to change with the 800-series. The top-spec X870E will be a 2-chip solution, with PCIe Gen 4 general purpose lane counts resembling the X670E; but the X870 is a single-chip solution that more closely resembles the B650E in I/O. The X870 (non-E) now gives you Gen 5 PCI-Express x16 PEG, just like the X870E and the B650E, and at least one Gen 5 x4 NVMe slot attached to the CPU, but has fewer downstream Gen 4 general purpose PCIe lanes than the X670. Both the X870E and X870 assure USB4 connectivity, and support CPU overclocking. Things get very interesting in the mid-range.
The AMD B850 is very similar to the X870 in terms of downstream general purpose PCIe Gen 4 lanes. What's more, it even assures a Gen 5 x16 PEG slot, much like the X870. Where it differs from the X870 is its CPU-attached NVMe slots. Gen 5 is made optional here (motherboard vendors can provide Gen 5 if they want, but are perfectly free to offer Gen 4 instead). Unlike the X870E and X870, the B850 doesn't mandate USB4 connectivity, however, motherboard vendors will be free to offer discrete USB4 controllers on their boards. Much like the B650 and its predecessors dating all the way back to the B350, the B850 supports CPU overclocking.

The B840 is a new introduction with this generation, there's no real predecessor to it, although it closely resembles the A620A, which in turn resembles the B550. It completely removes all forms of Gen 5 PCIe from the platform—the x16 slots are limited to Gen 4, as are the M.2 NVMe slots attached to the CPU. This chipset also lacks CPU overclocking support. It does retain memory overclocking, and B840 motherboards should support AMD EXPO, as well as manual memory overclocking. What sets the B840 apart from the A620 is its Gen 4 PCIe connectivity both along the PEG and general purpose PCIe.
Source: VideoCardz
Add your own comment

74 Comments on AMD Shuffles Feature-sets of its 800-series Chipset, X870 is B650E Successor

#26
Makaveli
The only thing I don't like is the chipset link is still PCIE 4.0 and not 5.0
Posted on Reply
#27
Cifu
MakaveliThe only thing I don't like is the chipset link is still PCIE 4.0 and not 5.0
The IOD of the Ryzen 9000 series exactly the as the Ryzen 7000 CPU's and the motherboard SOC of the 800 series exactly the same as the 600 series (Promontory21 or Prom21 in short).
What did you expect then? :)

Personally I don't really think there is any hard pressure to choose the 800 series over the 600 series.
Nothing new aside the USB4 and the Wifi7.
Posted on Reply
#28
Makaveli
CifuThe IOD of the Ryzen 9000 series exactly the as the Ryzen 7000 CPU's and the motherboard SOC of the 800 series exactly the same as the 600 series (Promontory21 or Prom21 in short).
What did you expect then? :)

Personally I don't really think there is any hard pressure to choose the 800 series over the 600 series.
Nothing new aside the USB4 and the Wifi7.
I know but I was hoping :)

Does the IF 2400 speed apply if you put a Zen 5 chip in a 600 series board?
Posted on Reply
#29
londiste
hsewI wish they’d get rid of the E suffix already… what’s wrong with X870 and X860/B860 instead of X870/E?
This kind of makes sense because the difference E denotes is not about the chipset but the requirements for the board. With ot without E, the chipset is the same.
Posted on Reply
#30
TheLostSwede
News Editor
Neo_MorpheusMany are buying intel over AMD just because of thunderbolt and here is AMD half-*ssing the closest thing they have (USB4).

Its a pain to root for them when they keep doing nonsense actions like this.
Sorry, but you clearly haven't read up on USB4.
Please read this before making uneducated comments.
www.techpowerup.com/review/usb4-guide-info-technology-details/

USB4 = 40 Gbps
Thunderbolt 3/4 = 32 Gbps.
MakaveliThe only thing I don't like is the chipset link is still PCIE 4.0 and not 5.0
It's a cost thing and it was a time to market thing. It's also a hardware development time/cost thing as well.
Considering it's ASMedia that makes the chipset for them and they have exactly zero PCIe 5.0 devices today, it would be a from scratch project for them in some ways.
I wouldn't expect that to happen until AMD decides to make a new chipset from scratch.
CifuPersonally I don't really think there is any hard pressure to choose the 800 series over the 600 series.
Nothing new aside the USB4 and the Wifi7.
You can already get 600-series boards with USB4 and WiFi 7.
www.techpowerup.com/322958/gigabyte-announces-the-b650e-aorus-pro-x-with-usb4
MakaveliDoes the IF 2400 speed apply if you put a Zen 5 chip in a 600 series board?
Unknown at the moment, but it might also be one of those things AMD tried to pull in the past, so only the new boards can support it due to reasons...
However, there should be no reason why it shouldn't work.
londisteThis kind of makes sense because the difference E denotes is not about the chipset but the requirements for the board. With ot without E, the chipset is the same.
Not any more.
With E = 2x Prom 21
Without E = 1x Prom 21
Posted on Reply
#31
Timbaloo
AMD yet again manages to confuse the shit out of me with their weird chipset lineup. So if a motherboard manufacturer decides to opt-in on Gen5-M.2 "from CPU" and USB4 with the B850 chipset, it automatically becomes an X870? Or what would the difference between B650 and X870 be in that case? Is it either Gen5-M.2 or UBS4 to "identify" as B850?

I guess once I understand the fuzz about all these different options and why they have to be there in the first place, I can easily write a thesis on quantum mechanics...
Posted on Reply
#32
Wirko
TheLostSwedeHuh? That never was a thing. All the lanes from the CPU are PCIe 5.0, but the chipset(s) are only PCIe 4.0.
Never was a thing - but now we know it also won't be. That's one of the biggest deficiencies of the 600 series chipsets, so I was expecting an upgrade to 5.0 in the next generation. A "Promontory 24" made on 7nm.
Posted on Reply
#33
TheLostSwede
News Editor
WirkoNever was a thing - but now we know it also won't be. That's one of the biggest deficiencies of the 600 series chipsets, so I was expecting an upgrade to 5.0 in the next generation.
Yeah, it was an issue for Intel in the past too, at least in theory, but no-one has proven that it's a real world bottleneck in either case.
TimbalooAMD yet again manages to confuse the shit out of me with their weird chipset lineup. So if a motherboard manufacturer decides to opt-in on Gen5-M.2 "from CPU" and USB4 with the B850 chipset, it automatically becomes an X870? Or what would the difference between B650 and X870 be in that case? Is it either Gen5-M.2 or UBS4 to "identify" as B850?

I guess once I understand the fuzz about all these different options and why they have to be there in the first place, I can easily write a thesis on quantum mechanics...
Well. this is technically an X870 board :cool:
www.techpowerup.com/322958/gigabyte-announces-the-b650e-aorus-pro-x-with-usb4
Posted on Reply
#34
b1k3rdude
So absolutely no mention of the CPU socket type or what RAM is supported...
Posted on Reply
#35
Tek-Check
ChaitanyaDoes that PCIe 5.0 x16 slot even matter for consumers outside of enterprise market?
Not until Gen5 GPUs are out. Once this happens, towards the end of the year, people will be able to run GPU in Gen5 x8 mode wihtout perofrmance loss and the second Gen5 x8 slot, if it's there, willl be freed for other devices such as NVMe array.
Posted on Reply
#36
Makaveli
b1k3rdudeSo absolutely no mention of the CPU socket type or what RAM is supported...
We should know in like 25 hours.
Posted on Reply
#37
Tek-Check
Super Firm TofuThis is just AMD copying Intel and locking out overclocking as they do on their 'B' series chipsets. Hasn't that been one of AMDs bigger marketing points that their chips are unlocked in contrast to Intel?
It's hardly copying when one can still OC AMD CPU on three chipsets and Intel's only on Z boards.
Neo_MorpheusMany are buying intel over AMD just because of thunderbolt and here is AMD half-*ssing the closest thing they have (USB4).
Its a pain to root for them when they keep doing nonsense actions like this.
Perhaps you could update half-*ssed knowledge of USB4 controller's spec?
ASM4242 USB4 chip supports much faster PCIe data transfer than Thunderbolt 4. ASM4242 supports PCIe 4.0 and TB4 PCIe 3.0. Speeds on ASM4242 reach 40 Gbps for PCIe data whereas on TB4 it's ~27 Gbps, after overhead.
WirkoWhich is disappointing for one more reason: there won't be a Gen 5 chipset link in this generation.
Nobody needs one now. Even Thunderbolt 5 does not support PCIe Gen5.
Random_UserThe chipsets for AM5 platform was the biggest let down. And AMD is yet doubling down on "bullsh*tery", instead of adressing the issues. The entire point of the AM5 platform becomes moot with such "decisions". And if motherboards on 600 series often is priced the same as literally two years later, the 800 series not only is not adding any value, or fixing the atrocious motherboard choice, but is doing completely opposite. Good luck buying the same old garbage P21 for new increased prices. Disgusting.
We are so sorry to have not met your expectations. Please receive sincere apologies from entire planet. Yours sincerely, human race.
ZubasaWhat exactly do you need that is TB4 specific which USB4 can't do?
He needs knowledge of the chip's spec in the first palce, and some humility, so that the post does not come across as ignorant arogance.
ZubasaThere are AM5 motherboards with TB4 controllers built in as well.
Indeed, mostly from Asrock and Asus.
ZubasaA couple of AM4 boards even have TB3 certification from Intel.
Even double Thunderbolt 4 ports, such as on Asus B550 ProArt.
TheLostSwedeYes, Thunderbolt has a networking layer that Intel didn't give to the USB-IF as well as VT-d based DMA protection, but that's the only real advantages.
This also works as USB4NET or USB4 P2P on USB4. In Windows 11, a network driver is automatically assigned when two PCs are connected and the file transfer speed is the same as on TB, so 10 Gbps in each direction. Not sure about Windows 10 though.
learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/component-guidelines/usb4-interdomain-connections
MakaveliThe only thing I don't like is the chipset link is still PCIE 4.0 and not 5.0
Gen5 chipset link will be expensive. And such chipset does not even exist at the moment.
CifuPersonally I don't really think there is any hard pressure to choose the 800 series over the 600 series.
Nothing new aside the USB4 and the Wifi7.
- faster memory and faster EXPO profile for those who need it
- faster video ports from onboard graphics, as Gigabyte's leak shows that iGPU on 9000 CPUs supports DP 2.1 at its full speed 80 Gbps.
- more boards will feature internal HDMI/DP port for another display attached to PC case
- we might finally get the first board featuring front USB4 port with 40 Gbps as ASM4242 chip supports two USB-C ports.

I agree there is no pressure. Improvements are simply incremental as the platform has matured now.
MakaveliDoes the IF 2400 speed apply if you put a Zen 5 chip in a 600 series board?
Each 600 board would need to roll out a seperate BIOS update for this to appear as an option.
TimbalooSo if a motherboard manufacturer decides to opt-in on Gen5-M.2 "from CPU" and USB4 with the B850 chipset, it automatically becomes an X870? Or what would the difference between B650 and X870 be in that case? Is it either Gen5-M.2 or UBS4 to "identify" as B850?
If a board has both Gen5 NVMe drive and USB4, it is X870 board. There is no "opt-in". It's segmented by default.
Posted on Reply
#39
Tek-Check
TheLostSwedeWell. this is technically an X870 board :cool:
www.techpowerup.com/322958/gigabyte-announces-the-b650e-aorus-pro-x-with-usb4
There is a bizarre spec entry by Gigabyte for iGPU:
"Integrated Graphics Processor with AMD Radeon™ Graphics support:
- 1 x HDMI port, supporting a maximum resolution of 7680x4320@60 Hz
* Support for HDMI 2.1 version, HDCP 2.3, and HDR.
** Support native HDMI 2.1 TMDS compatible ports."

TMDS signal (HDMI 2.0b) only support 18 Gbps, but Gigabyte says 8K/60Hz. These two things are mutually incompatible.
Posted on Reply
#40
LabRat 891
Tek-CheckThere is a bizarre spec entry by Gigabyte for iGPU:
"Integrated Graphics Processor with AMD Radeon™ Graphics support:
- 1 x HDMI port, supporting a maximum resolution of 7680x4320@60 Hz
* Support for HDMI 2.1 version, HDCP 2.3, and HDR.
** Support native HDMI 2.1 TMDS compatible ports."

TMDS signal (HDMI 2.0b) only support 18 Gbps, but Gigabyte says 8K/60Hz. These two things are mutually incompatible.
Assuming the HDMI 2.1 marketing is correct...

www.hdmi.org/spec/hdmi2_1

www.hdmi.org/spec21sub/eightk60_fourk120

HDMI 2.1 uses a new "FRL" signal scheme, *but* maintains compatibility with TMDS. So...
Their use of terms is both oddly specific and sorely lacking, leaving it kinda murky as to accuracy/capability.
Posted on Reply
#41
TheLostSwede
News Editor
b1k3rdudeSo absolutely no mention of the CPU socket type or what RAM is supported...
The socket is still AM5 and RAM is expected to be 8000 MHz EXPO, but remains at 5600 MHz base, from what I know.
Posted on Reply
#42
Zubasa
TheLostSwedeThe socket is still AM5 and RAM is expected to be 8000 MHz EXPO, but remains at 5600 MHz base, from what I know.
I assume that is because 5600 is still the highest JEDEC spec for DDR5 DIMMs?
At least that is the commonly available speed for JEDEC ram.
Posted on Reply
#44
Wirko
ZubasaI assume that is because 5600 is still the highest JEDEC spec for DDR5 DIMMs?
At least that is the commonly available speed for JEDEC ram.
Staying within JEDEC specification also means staying at 1.1 volts, so setting the base speed above 5600 wouldn't benefit anyone much.
Posted on Reply
#45
Makaveli
WirkoStaying within JEDEC specification also means staying at 1.1 volts, so setting the base speed above 5600 wouldn't benefit anyone much.
no users on this site will be running 5600 speeds that is for sure.
Posted on Reply
#46
regs
TheLostSwedeUSB4 = 40 Gbps
USB4 superseded USB3. So "USB4" still could mean just USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps).
Posted on Reply
#47
TheLostSwede
News Editor
regsUSB4 superseded USB3. So "USB4" still could mean just USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps).
No, it can not. USB4 is at a minimum 20 Gbps.
Please read:
www.techpowerup.com/review/usb4-guide-info-technology-details/
Makavelino users on this site will be running 5600 speeds that is for sure.
There are quite a few with much slower RAM than that, but maybe not with their Ryzen 7000-series CPUs.
Remember that not everyone on here has the latest or even last gen hardware.
Posted on Reply
#48
Makaveli
TheLostSwedeNo, it can not. USB4 is at a minimum 20 Gbps.
Please read:
www.techpowerup.com/review/usb4-guide-info-technology-details/


There are quite a few with much slower RAM than that, but maybe not with their Ryzen 7000-series CPUs.
Remember that not everyone on here has the latest or even last gen hardware.
This I know was speaking specifically about Ryzen 7000 series users.
Posted on Reply
#49
Wirko
Makavelino users on this site will be running 5600 speeds that is for sure.
Not many users I guess, but 5600 (only 5200 for Zen 4!) is guaranteed to work. This means there are a few CPUs out there that aren't fully stable at ~6000. Why would AMD set the *base* speed higher and risk a lot of RMAs?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Sep 17th, 2024 04:33 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts