Monday, July 1st 2024
Microsoft Closer to Removing Local Accounts from Windows 11, Removes Help Page on How to Switch to One
Microsoft really wants you to use Windows 11 with an online Microsoft Account. This lets the operating system integrate the single login for Microsoft Store, all the apps on it, Office or 365, Teams, OneDrive, Outlook, and more importantly, put a face to your name (making you and your machine identifiable to it). Some users, particularly power-users, tend to avoid this, by preferring local accounts—an account that's authenticated and maintained locally by the machine. Microsoft is viewed as making it increasingly difficult for users to create local accounts, particularly on the client versions of Windows, such as Windows 11 Home and Windows 11 Pro.
The Windows Setup by default flows you into creating a Microsoft Account, or logging in from one. Over the past several versions of Windows, Microsoft has made it harder, if not impossible, to create a local account during Setup. In what could be a step closer by the company to wean the market off local accounts, Microsoft removed the online Help page that guides users on how to switch from a Microsoft Account to a local one, as Tweaktown found out. The publication dug the page out using the Wayback Machine. Will Microsoft completely remove the ability to create local accounts? We don't know. All versions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 sit on the Windows NT architecture, which requires some form of local accounts. The Microsoft Account itself is layered on top of a local account. So, the ability to create a local account shouldn't go away for those who really want one, but it will be close to impossible for the vast majority of users trained by Google and Apple to have online accounts on their phones.
Source:
Tweaktown
The Windows Setup by default flows you into creating a Microsoft Account, or logging in from one. Over the past several versions of Windows, Microsoft has made it harder, if not impossible, to create a local account during Setup. In what could be a step closer by the company to wean the market off local accounts, Microsoft removed the online Help page that guides users on how to switch from a Microsoft Account to a local one, as Tweaktown found out. The publication dug the page out using the Wayback Machine. Will Microsoft completely remove the ability to create local accounts? We don't know. All versions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 sit on the Windows NT architecture, which requires some form of local accounts. The Microsoft Account itself is layered on top of a local account. So, the ability to create a local account shouldn't go away for those who really want one, but it will be close to impossible for the vast majority of users trained by Google and Apple to have online accounts on their phones.
142 Comments on Microsoft Closer to Removing Local Accounts from Windows 11, Removes Help Page on How to Switch to One
Similar things occur with security when people start placing video doorbells at their front door 'to feel safer'. And then they're checking their phone all day to see if someone's not at the door by chance. So safe, so comfy... so close to symptoms of mental illness... :P
I also use it now to make my music in bitwig studio and it works great!!
Bitwig was made by ex ableton devs
Link in sig to the complex music I make in Linux alone!
I'm not trying to offend anyone. This is not my goal. However, the reason, why the things have came that far, where it is all now, is because the main and primary target audience for MS Windows, is the domestic US citizen. The primary guinea pigs. And the vast majority US people do not give a sh*t about their security, nor rights, and do not even have a basic power user knowledge. Heck, most won't be able to install the apps themselves, or open them (W10/11 did make it even harder). Hence this is the source of all EULA BS, that MS pulls everywhere all over the world, except EU, because every governement and user on this planet is US/MS compliant by default.
So the ignorance and negligence of user base make the disservice to these very users. People feel comfortable, if the spyware is domestic, or for "safety reasons". Man. You're an adult person. If you still is convinced that MS's keyloggers are that 'safer'.... MS Windows Defender and Firewall is a broken colander. It's as dangerous, as third party bottom line AV software. The worst part is Defender is perfectly fine with passing the dangerous and broken MS updates, and potentially hazardous UWS apps from Store, as much as other MS in-house ad and spyware.
Nothing personal, but MS and their services, Defender included, are even more intrusive and dangerous than third party antivirus software, like e.g. Kaspersky. Which I had absolutely no issues with. Very lightweight, strong firewall, easy to turn off if needed, the enormous proven/tested program/app database, to exclude the false positives, the open reports, and known virus database.
Defender on the other hand is a can of worms... literally. It's completely hampers and stops the execution of of any software, while it scans or updates. When it does which is unknown, because it lives it's own life, ignoring any rules and settings. The amount of false positives is staggering. It bans basically everything, and especially the software MS is not keen on. While the danger of Defender to "let in" is yeat very high, but no one would know, untill it's too late. Windows is "fast food" of OS. The most users are lazy, ignorant and egoistic. AI and MS politics fit this pattern very well. People do not want to do many things for themselves, and rely on various services and devices. Thinking for themselves included. So they better rely on the "professionals" to do something for them. The MS and other companies, were taken over by selfish, sociopathic morons decades ago. This is just the back end of the wave, that is just only now reaching the shore. Great, that you've got things sorted out. And this is considering the HW manufacturers advertising their HW W11 'certified'. This is 'fools" tick box.
The other side of such described issue, is that it may be a case of BitLocker to lock all the user data completely, due to login error. And not only that. I've been transfering all my data from two drives to another, and the windows has locked all my data from one drive by previliges, while completely wiping the other, entire logical partition worth of data, after copying being 'successfuly complete'. To be honest, people always complained about linux is too complicated, and needs to do everything manually. But it's hard to believe, how the tables have turned. After "experiencing" W10, it's hard to imagine the amount of labour, pain and extremely overcomplicated stuff, just in order to make the Windows ready for work. I do not know, what kool aid people drink while praising W10/11 over W7. But when W7 was installed, it was ready to go out of the box, with exception of some drivers required to be manually installed, and it was so snappy and fast. Now, it's ungodly amount of efforts, just to make the OS being "clean" fresh install, not the advertising/spyware utility.
On the other hand, I had to use the GParted, and Linux Mint. And what a surprise, it works flawlessly, even as a live USB from a micro-SD flash drive. Though, I didn't go that far as installing the games, but everything else was blistering fast.
Also, people put linux into culprit role, but this is the software corporations like Adobe, Autodesk, etc, including the "anti-piracy/anticheat" software, that are both lazy to work their path towards the linux community, and also, most likely take the bags of "incentives' from MS in order to stay within the "established" userbase and ecosystem. These are real culprit and villain here, because:
1 linux community is free, and open source oriented, and they won't pay bribes, in order to pursuade the companies publish their software for linux, let alone, give the code into wide open repositories.
2 Companies are not going to distribute their products for free. This is perhaps the most significant point, that prevents the Linux adoption for professional use. Unless it's RHL, but even then, there's no real intentions to fill that gap even among the paid corporate linux environment.
So untill those giants would show their will to spread their products to OSes other than Windows, there's no way to improve Linux adoption. And this is beyond the power, or sheer will of users, and thus is not their guilt, nor the guilt of Linux community. The companies should make the first move.
And considering the deal between OpenAI and Apple, this is going to be the same garbage as Copilot and Recall.
Now take most linux distros, which can be installed on a toaster or a fridge, and be able to do whatever user wants.
When the user goes to view its passwords in the browser, the browser asks him to enter its password. Having the user admin password established increases security for the user.
The user MUST NOT click randomly on the Winaero Tweaker app without knowing what it is doing because the options in Winaero Tweaker take effect immediately: as soon as you click, it makes the changes immediately. So, the user MUST ONLY click on what it knows it is doing.
Even myself, I'm finding that with age, my want to tweak stuff is waning. With that being said, my next computer might very well be a Mac if Microsoft continues with their bullshit.
My personal fav is Linux Mint XFCE, but there are a bunch of other distro's that are great too.
I digress and will end this line of discussion as it's diverging from the topic.
But if it fits your needs, go with Mac. No one can tell someone what to do. Neither choice is an ultimate win for the user, anyway.
It refuses a Microsoft account, only accepts a corporate/education or local one during installation (you can use a Microsoft account once it finishes, but no enforced one bothering you), the new installer looks nice, and overall it's just what consumer Windows 11 should have always been.
Just added the store back (optional), and it's good to go.
Plus it's the only real safe option for old hardware without UEFI/TPM/Secureboot support, IoT LTSC is a Windows 10 drop-in replacement there.
But I will say that 24H2 is what Windows 11 should have been on day one. I can finally keep Windows set to HDR all the time for one, as it finally colour manages the whole OS! And as you say, you can still use all the tricks to get the OS working the "correct" way.
I don't know if you guys are interested, and maybe you all know about this already... But I found a wonderful autounattend.xml generator that helps remove the bloat, and takes care of the offline account situation, among many other nice things...
Generate autounattend.xml files for Windows 10/11 (schneegans.de)
But I will say it is very confusing with the amount of "effort" MS are putting into 24H4, it leaves me wondering what exactly Win12 will be other than maybe a slight UI refresh.
Obviously, this isn’t me saying that Win 12 (or whatever MS ends up calling it) is not coming out ever, but so far it doesn’t seem to be in development. Then again, 11 also wasn’t supposed to be a thing until MS decided to repurpose the bones of 10X to create it.
Either way, MS clearly feels quite comfortable messing with their 11 users. Whatever 11's current state may be, users can't trust that MS won't drastically "alter the deal," Vader-style, at some point, or indeed perhaps at many points, in the future. That lack of trust is a red flag in and of itself, even if the product ultimately remains mostly fine (due to a combination of third-party workarounds, and a cycle of consumer/media backlashes against MS's worst plans, e.g. Recall).