Monday, August 19th 2024

Arm to Dip its Fingers into Discrete GPU Game, Plans on Competing with Intel, AMD, and NVIDIA

According to a recent report from Globes, Arm, the chip design giant and maker of the Arm ISA, is reportedly developing a new discrete GPU at its Ra'anana development center in Israel. This development signals Arm's intention to compete directly with industry leaders like Intel, AMD, and NVIDIA in the massive discrete GPU market. Sources close to the matter reveal that Arm has assembled a team of approximately 100 skilled chip and software development engineers at its Israeli facility. The team is focused on creating GPUs primarily aimed at the video game market. However, industry insiders speculate that this technology could potentially be adapted for AI processing in the future, mirroring the trajectory of NVIDIA, which slowly integrated AI hardware accelerators into its lineup.

The Israeli development center is playing a crucial role in this initiative. The hardware teams are overseeing the development of key components for these GPUs, including the flagship Immortalis and Mali GPU. Meanwhile, the software teams are creating interfaces for external graphics engine developers, working with both established game developers and startups. Arm is already entering the PC market through its partners like Qualcomm with Snapdragon X chips. However, these chips run an integrated GPU, and Arm wants to provide discrete GPUs and compete there. While details are still scarce, Arm could make GPUs to accompany Arm-based Copilot+ PCs and some desktop builds. The final execution plan still needs to be discovered, and we are still waiting to see which stage Arm's discrete GPU project is in.
Sources: Globes, via Notebookcheck
Add your own comment

48 Comments on Arm to Dip its Fingers into Discrete GPU Game, Plans on Competing with Intel, AMD, and NVIDIA

#27
Daven
BwazeOk, a bad statement. Article says:

"Arm is already entering the PC market through its partners like Qualcomm with Snapdragon X chips. However, these chips run an integrated GPU, and Arm wants to provide discrete GPUs and compete there. While details are still scarce, Arm could make GPUs to accompany Arm-based Copilot+ PCs and some desktop builds. "

What I meant to say is it's not clear ARM is entering x86 PC market. True, there aren't any uses for discrete gaming GPUs outside x86 PCs. Yet.
I see what you are saying. It would be strange to develop a discrete GPU and its drivers to be only compatible with the ARM ISA.
Posted on Reply
#28
Kyan
DavenThe article states…

“…is reportedly developing a new discrete GPU at its Ra'anana development center in Israel.”

“The team is focused on creating GPUs primarily aimed at the video game market.”

What market other than the PC uses discrete GPUs for video games?
I'm not 100% sure but cloud gaming need gpu for rendering, with or without output, right ?
Posted on Reply
#29
TheinsanegamerN
R0H1T$200~400 range cards are not gonna pay your bills for the next gen uarch R&D, this is where AMD was at least partially smart in having to sell/make more server CPU's than say consumer/server GPU's although the AI boom caught them flat footed.

And so unless you are Nvidia DIY space is not for you, in fact stay away from PC (graphics) completely!
I havent seen brainrot this bad since the singing chicken nuggets.

We're just gonna ignore the billions nvidia makes off of mid range cards, they dont just sell flagships. There's a big market there.
Posted on Reply
#30
R0H1T
Nvidia's mid range is $500~1000, they've not released a "mid range" priced GPU since probably Pascal. Maybe we should all book a trip through Elon's time machine when mid range actually cost like a mid range, not x50/Ti class chips selling for 1.5-2x their normal prices or sold as x60/Ti instead. :rolleyes:
OnasiYeah, no. If NV actually, literally was the only player left they would absolutely be hit by an anti-trust.
That's what you think, let's how see how it actually plays out in the real world where we have the likes of Google/Apple/Oracle/Amazon/FB/MS & a million other similar monopolies!
Posted on Reply
#31
Darmok N Jalad
There might actually be room for this, in the mobile dGPU market to compliment their SD-X chips. They probably pretty easily boost GPU performance over the iGPU while not trying to compete in the tough high-end market.
Posted on Reply
#32
TheinsanegamerN
R0H1TNvidia's mid range is $500~1000, they've not released a "mid range" priced GPU since probably Pascal. Maybe we should all book a trip through Elon's time machine when mid range actually cost like a mid range, not x50/Ti class chips selling for 1.5-2x their normal prices or sold as x60/Ti instead. :rolleyes:
4060ti is $400. 4060 is $300.

Of course, you may want to pay attention to wages when you take that time trip. Much like people whining about house prices, you may find that the past was not all sunshine and rainbows.

Before the AI boom, nvidia's margins had raised from 26% in 2017 to 33% in 2022. The price increases you saw in that time, are the result of money printing. this is called inflation. Cost of raw material has increased, labor has increased, and transportation has increased.

$500 is the new $300.
R0H1TThat's what you think, let's how see how it actually plays out in the real world where we have the likes of Google/Apple/Oracle/Amazon/FB/MS & a million other similar monopolies!
The irony of you listing multiple companies that compete with each other as an example of monopolies is just......LMFAO :laugh: :roll: :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#33
R0H1T
4060 is AD107 which is historically a xx50 card.
TheinsanegamerNThe irony of you listing multiple companies that compete with each other as an example of monopolies is just......LMFAO :laugh: :roll: :laugh:
Maybe you should look up the word irony, on Google :wtf:
www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-08-13/doj-considers-seeking-google-goog-breakup-after-major-antitrust-win
And yes all of them are monopolies in some sectors. Or maybe you didn't know that Amazon sells products online, as well as has AWS?
Posted on Reply
#34
TheinsanegamerN
R0H1T4060 is AD107 which is historically a xx50 card.
Hey look, moving goalposts! Neat!
R0H1TMaybe you should look up the word irony, on Google :wtf:
www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-08-13/doj-considers-seeking-google-goog-breakup-after-major-antitrust-win
And yes all of them are monopolies in some sectors. Or maybe you didn't know that Amazon sells products online, as well as has AWS?
There are alternatives to everything you just listed. Often multiple other big players.
Posted on Reply
#35
R0H1T
Didn't move any post or whatever, the mid range card IMO is a mid sized card/chip ^ that market has moved substantially from even 5 years back! Maybe you should relook at the statement you quoted?
TheinsanegamerNThere are alternatives to everything you just listed. Often multiple other big players.
Doesn't stop them from being monopolies does it? Did you look up irony on Bing google yet?
Posted on Reply
#36
TheinsanegamerN
R0H1TDidn't move any post or whatever, the mid range card IMO is a mid sized card/chip ^ that market has moved substantially from even 5 years back! Maybe you should relook at teh statement you quoted?

Doesn't stop them from being monopolies does it? Did you look up irony on Bing google yet?
Have you looked up Dunning-Kruger yet?
Posted on Reply
#37
Bwaze
Debate on monopolies is really quite off topic here. Although Nvidia has a large market share, there is a place for other companies, this is obvious to everyone.

And it isn't clear ARM even aims to compete with Nvidia and others in any area, it looks to me like they will enter in a field that doesn't even exist yet.
Posted on Reply
#40
TheLostSwede
News Editor
PaganstompPutting more stress on the RAM market. IMO.
GDDR ≠ DDR
Posted on Reply
#41
Athlonite
TheinsanegamerN4060ti is $400. 4060 is $300.


$500 is the new $300.
Those are low end for nVidia mid range starts at 4070's so 4070/70S/70Ti and ends at 4080 non Super/Ti
Posted on Reply
#42
Macro Device
TheinsanegamerNHey look, moving goalposts! Neat!
Unfortunately, he's not the one moving goalposts. 4060 is a tiny chip sold for almost same money as 3060 providing about the same performance... but two years later. And with 4090 being more than 1.5 times faster than 3090 despite being more cut-down Ada than 3090 is cut-down Ampere.

The whole Ada Lovelace generation (RTX 4090 excluded) does consist of heavily cut-down GPUs for the price of one or two segments up and NV only got away with that because there is NO competition on the market. ARM making claims is great but unless we see their products actually putting a "why do I want this?" label on NV devices, this still doesn't contribute to real competition. NV will still get away. And I don't really see how ARM could do that. It needs R&D no one ever has on top of geniuses no one has employed to come true before 2030.
Posted on Reply
#44
HisDivineOrder
Interesting given that Nvidia almost bought them a few years back. Let's hope they can get it done. We desperately need more competition.
Posted on Reply
#45
ScaLibBDP
>>...Arm ... is reportedly developing a new discrete GPU at its Ra'anana development center in Israel ...

I'd like to note that Intel's AVX-512 ISA, a complete disaster for Intel, was also designed in Israel.

In overall, it is a good decision by ARM since more GPU vendors, more competition, and lower prices for GPUs.
Posted on Reply
#46
Count von Schwalbe
Will arm even make a GPU though? They don't make CPUs. Sure, they make the uARCH, but will it be up to people like Qualcomm to actually design and make the chips?

Considering the level of effort required to develop and maintain game ready drivers for GPUs, I can't see many people licensing the ARM GPU ISA for gaming chips.
TheLostSwedeGDDR ≠ DDR
And Apple M3 ≠ 9700X, but they still compete for foundry space. However, I doubt another minor player in the GPU space will affect memory demand, as their sales will be at the expense of someone else's.
Posted on Reply
#47
TheLostSwede
News Editor
Count von SchwalbeWill arm even make a GPU though? They don't make CPUs. Sure, they make the uARCH, but will it be up to people like Qualcomm to actually design and make the chips?
Qualcomm makes Adreno, so there's zero chance of them doing an Arm based GPU. It'll most likely be another unheard of xinese company, like in the case of Imagination.
Count von SchwalbeConsidering the level of effort required to develop and maintain game ready drivers for GPUs, I can't see many people licensing the ARM GPU ISA for gaming chips.
It's even harder to get certified pro level drivers, so the only use case appears to be another shitty AI accelerator...
Count von SchwalbeAnd Apple M3 ≠ 9700X, but they still compete for foundry space. However, I doubt another minor player in the GPU space will affect memory demand, as their sales will be at the expense of someone else's.
It's not as bad in the memory market though.
Posted on Reply
#48
ViperXZ
Will probably be the next failure after Intel GPU. Intel had way more going for them with GPU experience and they failed miserably, so I’m not gonna hold my breath for this. If it’s only for AI or whatever it could be okay, but gaming, highly doubt it will be good if that’s what they wanna do. Building GPUs is like building planes it seems, a lot wanna do it, most fail and only two are good at it at the end.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 23rd, 2024 08:00 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts