Friday, September 13th 2024
Intel Core Ultra 200 Arrow Lake CPUs Specifications Leaked
There is only a month left before the official launch of Intel new "Arrow Lake" CPUs. Now, we have a new leak revealing what appear to be the final specs for Intel's Core Ultra 200 'Arrow Lake' desktop CPUs series. According to Benchlife, Intel is preparing to release five SKUs. Although there is no KF version of the Core Ultra 9 285K yet, the new CPUs include: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, Core Ultra 7 265K, Core Ultra 7 265KF, Core Ultra 5 245K, and Core Ultra 5 245KF. These processors will also be accompanied by new Z890 chipset motherboards.
The "K" model will have Xe-LPG-based integrated graphics, while the "KF" model will require a discrete GPU. Intel plans to expand its Arrow Lake lineup in early 2025 with non-K models. These new CPUs are expected to offer increased performance compared to their 13th and 14th generation predecessors. The new architecture aims to eliminate stability issues and reduce real-world power consumption.
Flagship Model: Core Ultra 9 285K
Sources:
Benchlife, VideoCardz
The "K" model will have Xe-LPG-based integrated graphics, while the "KF" model will require a discrete GPU. Intel plans to expand its Arrow Lake lineup in early 2025 with non-K models. These new CPUs are expected to offer increased performance compared to their 13th and 14th generation predecessors. The new architecture aims to eliminate stability issues and reduce real-world power consumption.
- 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) and 24 threads
- Lion Cove architecture for P-cores and Skymont for E-cores
- 76 MB total cache (36 MB L3 + 40 MB L2)
- Base clocks: 3.7 GHz (P-cores) / 3.2 GHz (E-cores)
- Boost clocks: 5.7 GHz (P-cores) / 4.6 GHz (E-cores)
- TDP: 125 W (PL1) / 250 W (PL2)
- 20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) and 20 threads
- 66 MB total cache (30 MB L3 + 36 MB L2)
- Base clocks: 3.9 GHz (P-cores) / 3.3 GHz (E-cores)
- Boost clocks: 5.5 GHz (P-cores) / 4.6 GHz (E-cores)
- TDP: 125 W (PL1) / 250 W (PL2)
- 14 cores (6 P-cores + 8 E-cores) and 14 threads
- 50 MB total cache (24 MB L3 + 26 MB L2)
- Base clocks: 4.2 GHz (P-cores) / 3.6 GHz (E-cores)
- Boost clocks: 5.2 GHz (P-cores) / 4.6 GHz (E-cores)
- TDP: 125 W (PL1) / 159 W (PL2)
58 Comments on Intel Core Ultra 200 Arrow Lake CPUs Specifications Leaked
The reason 7800X3D uses little power is because of gimped clockspeeds, something 9800X3D should be able to address. Who cares if a CPU uses 50, 75 or 100 watts in gaming tho. LMAO.
Besides, even 14900K uses like 140 watts on average in gaming. 13700K uses 100 watts on average.
You think a game stresses a CPU much? AMD 3D chips are generally great for gaming, and nothing else really. Intel delivers a far better all-round solution and this will continue with Arrow Lake, now with much better performance per watt, and lower watts in general, thanks to TSMC 3N.
AMD is now behind on node. Lets see how AMD will do without node advantage. Zen 5 already a huge failure, with most chips collecting dust. 9000X3D might save Ryzen 9000 tho. 3D without gimped clockspeeds and unlocked for OC? Yes please. I will replace my 7800X3D in a heartbeat but will go Arrow Lake instead if good. I need more CPU power for productivity and sadly dual CCD options are crap for gaming so if Intel can deliver both in a single package, I am buying 285K.
I expect Zen 5 to drop further in price after Arrow Lake launch and then AMD starts hyping for 9000X3D with release in Q1 next year. Arrow Lake will grab the gaming and productivity crown in a few weeks. 9800X3D will take gaming crown back in Q1.
9950X will be dropped to 500 dollars to deliver better performance per dollar than 285K in productivity but 285K will win in gaming and most single thread tasks as well. 9950X3D will match 285K in gaming but loose in productivty.
You see, AMD has plenty of issues. Dual CCD is not good for gaming. Single CCD is capped at 8 cores and lacks multithreaded performance, Ryzen 8 core chips are slapped in produtivity with ease. 3D chips are gimped on clockspeed and therefore is no match for Intel in productivity as well. With AMD, you can't get a do-it-all chip.
I think there was a cpu design they were working on with RUs that can even merge cores together to form supercores and even 4 way HT. Intel canceled it I think which this would have been the best for music production! I even thought of that concept a few years ago. intel read my mind, stole my idea and then cancelled it.
Why do you think they are throwing billions at this when they can just get more multithreading?
I can give you an example - when you open a web page in your browser, it runs through a single thread, the faster it is, the faster it loads.