Monday, October 21st 2024
AMD Set to Extend AM4 Platform with New Ryzen 5 5600XT and 5600T Processors
AMD continues to expand the AM4 platform with new processors, despite having already released 145 AM4 SKUs over the past nine years. According to Videocardz, citing a post from @momomo_us on the X platform, AMD plans to launch two new ones: the Ryzen 5 5600T and 5600XT. The leak was later confirmed on ASUS and MSI websites, with these 6-core CPUs appearing on lists of supported motherboards. The MSI page confirms that (at least) the 5600T is a Vermeer processor without integrated graphics. Additionally, AMD intends to make the Ryzen 3 5300G available to consumers as a boxed retail product; until now, this model has been available exclusively for OEM markets since its launch in 2021.
Going into more detail, these new SKUs have the following specifications: The Ryzen 5 5600XT features a 6-core design, 32 MB L3 cache, 65 W TDP, and a base frequency of 3.8 GHz. The Ryzen 5 5600T also has a 6-core design, 32 MB L3 cache, and 65 W TDP, but with a lower base frequency of 3.5 GHz. The Ryzen 3 5300G comes with a 4-core design, 8 MB L3 cache, 65 W TDP, a base frequency of 4 GHz, and is equipped with 6CU scale core graphics (no information regarding turbo clocks for any of these SKUs yet). As mentioned, the current lineup for the AM4 platform includes 145 SKUs, with the Ryzen 5000 series alone already having 20 models. While AMD's dedication to supporting the AM4 platform is admirable, a simple question arises: who will buy or distinguish these new AM4 SKUs from such a vast offering?
Sources:
Videocardz, @momomo_us
Going into more detail, these new SKUs have the following specifications: The Ryzen 5 5600XT features a 6-core design, 32 MB L3 cache, 65 W TDP, and a base frequency of 3.8 GHz. The Ryzen 5 5600T also has a 6-core design, 32 MB L3 cache, and 65 W TDP, but with a lower base frequency of 3.5 GHz. The Ryzen 3 5300G comes with a 4-core design, 8 MB L3 cache, 65 W TDP, a base frequency of 4 GHz, and is equipped with 6CU scale core graphics (no information regarding turbo clocks for any of these SKUs yet). As mentioned, the current lineup for the AM4 platform includes 145 SKUs, with the Ryzen 5000 series alone already having 20 models. While AMD's dedication to supporting the AM4 platform is admirable, a simple question arises: who will buy or distinguish these new AM4 SKUs from such a vast offering?
50 Comments on AMD Set to Extend AM4 Platform with New Ryzen 5 5600XT and 5600T Processors
Edit: The 5300G should have been released to the public right from the start. It would have been a great HTPC chip. Now you can pair a 5600 XT with your 5600 XT. Brilliant! :D
At least we finally got a quad core? Shame most of the motherboards are not made anymore.
And at the same time they are facing out the only models that make sense, the X3D, meaning the 5800X3D.
Also no idea who besides Zen 1 owners needs these castrated AM4 chips when 12100F systems are sometimes cheaper than a CPU alone and provide as much value for 98% users. Also much easier to cool. 5700X3D is basically the only "new" AM4 SKU worth consideration IMO.
Shame 5800X3D is discontinued.
As a side note, 5800X3D is up over 500 beaver bucks on ebay buy it now lol.. I paid like 650 for mine new when they were new..
Once you consider that people are going to dump 5700X3D/5800X3D in a year or so it's just a much better investment.
Going Intel will force you to buy a very cheap motherboard that's most definitely going to struggle running a high-power chip.
I wonder if you just snug a local once in a lifetime deal because I haven't seen that happen (yet?). Because a quad-core in 2024 (12100) will offer you very marginal savings compared to a hex-core for an already compromised system.
Unless you couldn't give a single shit about longevity, multi-core performance or gaming a 12100F is a rather poor recommendation.
That isn't to say Intel is a poor choice. The 12100 and 12400 make for a neat basic home-office or NAS setup and the 13400/13500 are quite nice if you want some more productivity oomph. Especially considering you can use dirt cheap DDR4 with them.
The 8500G looks nice, but is somewhat compromised because of its 2+4 configuration and the 8600G becomes a tough sell once you include DDR5 prices.
However, 12100F is now so low cost it's actually insane value. 50 USD second-hand sometimes. Even a basically inferior Ryzen 3600 does cost more. Especially considering RAM and cooling spendings (don't forget that Zen 2 is atrocious with cheap RAM and is allergic to some brands in particular).
And if your target is 60 FPS all these CPUs are fine and will be fine for a couple years at least. By the time they become non-fine you either slot a 5700X3D or a 12700/13600/14600 in (the latter is also likely to be cheaper) and get a decent boost in gaming.
For productivity... why are we talking productivity on lowest tier CPUs? Want MT, get a 5950X or something.
Most people who invest in older platforms dont waste money on frequent CPU upgrades. That's squarely the realm of people with money. Intel isnt some magic wizard forcing you to buy crap boards. Nope. Up until about half a year ago, AMD chips were going for a bare minimum of $200 for 6 cores, or $180 if you wanted a garbage mobile reject with half the cache. Intel went on sale frequently, and 12 series i5s were frequently available for $120 with sale code.
AM4 mobos are also insanely expensive for what's left, far more then a year ago.
I doubt the 5300G would be faster in games. What a bummer :ohwell: