Thursday, October 24th 2024

Roblox To Roll Out New Child Safety Rules After Scathing 'Pedophile Hellscape' Report

We previously covered a damning report that levelled some pretty severe allegations at Roblox concerning a mix of child safety and false platform metrics. While nothing seems to have been done about the latter, Roblox looks to be addressing the former, and far more serious, of the allegations. According to a Bloomberg report, Roblox will add child safety measures in November that will give parents more control over what their children can see and interact with in Roblox's various games and communities.

According to Bloomberg, Roblox sent parents of the platform's minor audience an email detailing the new changes coming in November. Seemingly in response to the recent criticism, Roblox is putting more control in the hands of parents. Specifically, children under 13 will need parental approval in order to access certain chat features, although the company declined to clarify on exactly what it means by this. Additionally, children under nine years of age will require parental approval in order to play games known to contain moderate violence or crude humor. For more involved parents, Roblox is also introducing a new account type that will allow parents to supervise their online activities. These new safety measures come after Roblox effectively dismissed the October 9 Hindenburg report's accusations that it wasn't doing enough to protect its minor audience.
Whether these new safety protocols will actually help is yet to be seen, since it's more or less commonly accepted that parental controls are mostly a stop-gap solution that only serve to delay children access to content they should not be seeing. While parents of children active on Roblox will also likely appreciate the additional control over what their children can and can't do on the platform, it should be noted that Roblox hasn't committed to stepping up its chat and in-game moderation, instead placing the onus on the guardians of its minor users, which make up as much as 58% of its user base.
Sources: Bloomberg, Statista, Game Developer
Add your own comment

29 Comments on Roblox To Roll Out New Child Safety Rules After Scathing 'Pedophile Hellscape' Report

#1
DirtyDingusMcgee
The internet has never been a safe place for children. Hell, it is barely safe for grown-ups. I play plenty of Roblox with my family. I've not seen anything that ever worried me, but i keep watching just in case.
Posted on Reply
#2
lexluthermiester
DirtyDingusMcgeeThe internet has never been a safe place for children.
TRUTH! Completely agree. No child should be allowed on the net without direct, active parental supervision.
DirtyDingusMcgeeHell, it is barely safe for grown-ups.
Also true. :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#3
GenericUsername2001
I have kids; my simple rule is that any game or video time is limit (I set a timer) and for the younger children all device time is done either on the living room TV, or laptop on kitchen table. My teenage son recently built himself a gaming PC (worked fast food over the summer so he could pay for it); I just require him to leave his bed room door open when he is doing stuff on the computer. Makes it trivial to see what they are up to on the internets.
Posted on Reply
#4
AusWolf
I don't have any kids, but...

One would be crazy not to set up any parental control these days. The internet is a dangerous and vile place. Defo not meant for children.

If I had any kids, I wouldn't buy them a smartphone, tablet, or anything similar until they're in high school. I'd let a primary school kid play on the PC, but only with the games I select.

On the other side of the spectrum, I know folks who let their kids use a smartphones from day one. Now, their small one is 10 years old and only recently learned to speak.
Posted on Reply
#5
R-T-B
AusWolfOne would be crazy not to set up any parental control these days.
Yes. Including heavy parental oversight, one would hope.
Posted on Reply
#6
Macro Device
lexluthermiesterNo child should be allowed on the net without direct, active parental supervision.
AusWolfIf I had any kids, I wouldn't buy them a smartphone, tablet, or anything similar until they're in high school
How one learns how to walk if you walk for them? Just make sure they trust you enough for your "this resource is rubbish" to actually matter for them. With this overprotection, they'll be inexperienced adults just like those born in late 70s introduced to their first ever PC with connectivity around Y2K. In the modern age, it's leagues worse than having bad experience.
Posted on Reply
#7
AusWolf
Beginner Macro DeviceHow one learns how to walk if you walk for them? Just make sure they trust you enough for your "this resource is rubbish" to actually matter for them. With this overprotection, they'll be inexperienced adults just like those born in late 70s introduced to their first ever PC with connectivity around Y2K. In the modern age, it's leagues worse than having bad experience.
Give me one good reason why an 8 year-old needs a smartphone. I didn't have one until I was like 20 and I ended up fine, knowing all I need about safe browsing, data protection and such. I do not expect a child to understand these concepts, so I feel it is safer to shield them from them until they're old enough to get it. You wouldn't want to teach a toddler about safe sex, right? It's kind of a similar thing, imo.
Posted on Reply
#8
Macro Device
AusWolfI do not expect a child to understand these concepts
These aren't exactly rocket science. Quite the opposite: easy to grasp and exceptionally important. Even an 8 y.o. can manage, provided they aren't mentally challenged and you can speak their language.
Of course I doubt I'd buy a pre-teen kid a smartphone of their own but I'd definitely let them use mine in a restricted mode since they're around 7 up until they understand the risks. Once they pass all the safety exams, I would grant them a new toy. My main concern is screentime, people of all ages are quite prone to abuse their smartphones. Can damage their arms, impact the rest of the skeleton... not ideal.
Posted on Reply
#9
AusWolf
Beginner Macro DeviceThese aren't exactly rocket science. Quite the opposite: easy to grasp and exceptionally important. Even an 8 y.o. can manage, provided they aren't mentally challenged and you can speak their language.
You still haven't answered the question why a child needs a smartphone. If there is a genuine, legitimate reason for it, then I'll consider what you said. Until then, I'll hold my opinion.
Beginner Macro DeviceOf course I doubt I'd buy a pre-teen kid a smartphone of their own but I'd definitely let them use mine in a restricted mode since they're around 7 up until they understand the risks. Once they pass all the safety exams, I would grant them a new toy. My main concern is screentime, people of all ages are quite prone to abuse their smartphones. Can damage their arms, impact the rest of the skeleton... not ideal.
Not to mention mental impairment.
Like I said above, I know folks whose 10 year-old son has been using smartphones since day one. He can browse Youtube and app stores better than any of us, but he still hasn't fully gained the ability to speak.
Posted on Reply
#10
Macro Device
AusWolfYou still haven't answered the question why a child needs a smartphone.
They don't need a smartphone. They need to know how to use it properly.
AusWolfHe can browse Youtube and app stores better than any of us, but he still hasn't fully gained the ability to speak.
This is abuse. Plain and simple.
Posted on Reply
#11
AusWolf
Beginner Macro DeviceThey don't need a smartphone. They need to know how to use it properly.
Yes, with time when they actually need one. Like I said, I had my first smartphone at the age of 20, and I still learned how to use it properly. An 8 year-old is not missing out on anything.
Beginner Macro DeviceThis is abuse. Plain and simple.
I know those people well, and it's not abuse. I find it revolting that you'd even suggest that. The little fella gets all the love he needs (probably even a bit too much in my opinion).

Edit: When your only exposure to other humans is through Youtube videos on a smartphone's screen, that you interact with by touch, not by speech, then of course you'll never learn to speak. Why would you?
Posted on Reply
#12
Macro Device
AusWolfI know those people well, and it's not abuse.
It's a smartphone abuse by a kid, not a kid abuse by their mums'n'pops.
AusWolfLike I said, I had my first smartphone at the age of 20
That was what, like 2010? Now smartphones are a necessity in some schools, you literally can't have marks sans.
AusWolfYes, with time when they actually need one.
What if I'm dead already by this time? They'll have to make it on their own, completely clueless as to how it actually works. I want them to have the knowledge as soon as possible. The device, only when necessary.
Posted on Reply
#13
AusWolf
Beginner Macro DeviceIt's a smartphone abuse by a kid, not a kid abuse by their mums'n'pops.
Ah! That much is true.
Beginner Macro DeviceThat was what, like 2010? Now smartphones are a necessity in some schools, you literally can't have marks sans.
Why would a kid need a smart phone to get marked in school? :eek: That is sick and wrong. :(
Beginner Macro DeviceWhat if I'm dead already by this time? They'll have to make it on their own, completely clueless as to how it actually works. I want them to have the knowledge as soon as possible. The device, only when necessary.
What if you're dead by the time your kids need to learn about bees'n'flowers? Are you gonna start teaching them as soon as they can speak just in case?
Death comes when it comes, and you'll never be ready for it, no matter how hard you try.
Posted on Reply
#14
R-T-B
Beginner Macro DeviceThat was what, like 2010? Now smartphones are a necessity in some schools, you literally can't have marks sans.
Not stateside, the current debate for some districts is whether its ok to remove them from the children until the end of the schoolday, in a locker system. Some districts already do this.
Posted on Reply
#15
Macro Device
R-T-BNot stateside, the current debate for some districts is whether its ok to remove them from the children until the end of the schoolday, in a locker system. Some districts already do this.
As of 2022, we had it pretty much in a "we don't give a crap" mode. Phones are banned from usage during the classes, students are free to do whatever during the breaks. Never followed the school news since, my teacher friend got fired and changed her line of work permanently.
Posted on Reply
#16
lexluthermiester
What strikes me as different is the poll results. Currently 80% "No children"?!? Are people just not having kids?
Posted on Reply
#17
R-T-B
lexluthermiesterWhat strikes me as different is the poll results. Currently 80% "No children"?!? Are people just not having kids?
Yes, that's been a documented thing with millenials on-forward for a while now. Birth rates are very much down.
Posted on Reply
#18
AusWolf
lexluthermiesterWhat strikes me as different is the poll results. Currently 80% "No children"?!? Are people just not having kids?
Well, the missus can't have 'em (due to health reasons), and I can't stand 'em. I don't know why others voted that, though. 80% is high.
Posted on Reply
#19
lexluthermiester
AusWolfWell, the missus can't have 'em (due to health reasons), and I can't stand 'em. I don't know why others voted that, though. 80% is high.
I have an above average number of kids and grandkids. Still, that 80% of none is surprising.
Posted on Reply
#20
AusWolf
lexluthermiesterI have an above average number of kids and grandkids. Still, that 80% of none is surprising.
It is. I always thought I was an outlier for not wanting to have kids.
Posted on Reply
#21
R-T-B
Even I'll say 80% is rather high. What is that from, though?
Posted on Reply
#22
lexluthermiester
R-T-BEven I'll say 80% is rather high. What is that from, though?
The Front page thread poll. So just people participating here.
Posted on Reply
#23
AusWolf
R-T-BEven I'll say 80% is rather high. What is that from, though?
Considering that I talked about the gaming community being mainly composed of IT dude bros who have zero interaction with women in another thread recently, maybe it isn't so surprising after all.
Posted on Reply
#24
R-T-B
AusWolfConsidering that I talked about the gaming community being mainly composed of IT dude bros who have zero interaction with women in another thread recently, maybe it isn't so surprising after all.
Well I'm a frog so don't know that chasing human woman would be ok anyways...

No kids here, anyways.
Posted on Reply
#25
lexluthermiester
R-T-BWell I'm a frog so don't know that chasing human woman would be ok anyways...

No kids here, anyways.
Seriously man, go get married. You're too smart not to pass your DNA forward to the next generations.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 06:45 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts