Thursday, November 7th 2024

NVIDIA GeForce Now Gimps Game Streaming With New Monetization, Monthly Play Time Caps

NVIDIA today announced incoming changes to its GeForce Now game streaming service, some of which are not likely to sit well with gamers. The biggest, and likely most controversial change coming to GeForce Now is the addition of monthly playtime caps for all GeForce Now users, regardless of which plan they're on. According to the blog post announcing the changes, GeForce Now gamers will be limited to 100 hours of gameplay per month in addition to the daily playtime caps. NVIDIA will allow gamers who don't use their whole monthly cap to roll 15 hours of game time into the following month.

It's not all bad news, however, as NVIDIA also announced that it will be increasing the resolution and image quality of the GeForce Now Performance tier—previously Priority—from 1080p to 1440p. The Ultimate and Basic tiers remain unchanged in both name and feature set. NVIDIA says the playtime limit was necessary in order "to continue providing exceptional quality and speed—as well as shorter queue times." Of course players can buy extra playtime at a rate of $2.99 for 15 hours of GeForce Now Performance and $5.99 for 15 hours of GeForce Now Ultimate. The playtime limits will come into effect on January 1, 2025, and anyone that signs up for a paid GeForce Now subscription before then won't be subjected to the new playtime limits until January 2026.
NVIDIA says the playtime limits will be adequate for 94% of GeForce Now users, and advises gamers to use the GeForce Now Playtime Details dashboard to monitor their usage to avoid accidentally going over the maximum time. NVIDIA is also discounting the GeForce Now Day Pass by 25%, reducing the cost to $2.99 for Performance Day Pass and $5.99 for Ultimate Day Pass. This discount, in combination with NVIDIA's promise of delayed playtime limits for new users that subscribe before December 31, seem like an attempt to soften the blow of the new playtime requirements and garner new subscribers.

NVIDIA also announced a host of new games joining GeForce Now in November:
  • Planet Coaster 2 (New release on Steam, Nov. 6)
  • Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Splintered Fate (New release on Steam, Nov. 6)
  • Empire of the Ants
  • Unrailed 2: Back on Track
  • TCG Card Shop Simulator
  • StarCraft II
  • StarCraft Remastered
Source: NVIDIA
Add your own comment

73 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce Now Gimps Game Streaming With New Monetization, Monthly Play Time Caps

#26
lexluthermiester
Darmok N JaladNext step? Commercial breaks featuring pharmaceutical companies.
Yeah very likely.
Posted on Reply
#27
Cheeseball
Not a Potato
skizzoseriously, who has time to play video games for 100+ hours a month besides this guy!?



I understand the gripe, it's a shitty policy based on principle, but......lol.....wow.....some people don't do moderation well. being addicted to video games is not healthy.
Thats only just above 3 hours a day. That's completely doable for most adults nowadays.
Posted on Reply
#28
TheinsanegamerN
skizzoseriously, who has time to play video games for 100+ hours a month besides this guy!?



I understand the gripe, it's a shitty policy based on principle, but......lol.....wow.....some people don't do moderation well. being addicted to video games is not healthy.
It's 100 hours, who needs 90 hours? 80 hours is fine, why are you complaining about 70 hours, 60 hours is more then enough!

Give them an inch and they will take a mile. Apparently we have to cram this lesson into people's head with a 2x4.
Posted on Reply
#29
lexluthermiester
CheeseballThats only just above 3 hours a day. That's completely doable for most adults nowadays.
People watch more TV/Streaming than that..
Posted on Reply
#31
Darmok N Jalad
skizzoseriously, who has time to play video games for 100+ hours a month besides this guy!?



I understand the gripe, it's a shitty policy based on principle, but......lol.....wow.....some people don't do moderation well. being addicted to video games is not healthy.
I agree that 100 hours a month on a hobby/recreation of any kind is probably a bit on the high side. I'm lucky to get an hour a night, but maybe in my younger days, it was more likely. I guess when you consider we used to just watch TV for 3+ hours a day, gaming probably just replaced that habit...maybe. Excessive screen time is definitely not great for us, though.
TheinsanegamerNIt's 100 hours, who needs 90 hours? 80 hours is fine, why are you complaining about 70 hours, 60 hours is more then enough!

Give them an inch and they will take a mile. Apparently we have to cram this lesson into people's head with a 2x4.
I don't think OP was saying a limit of any kind is okay, but rather playing games in excess was his point.
Posted on Reply
#32
TumbleGeorge
Corporation make parental control on you? When you is a free, adult citizen of free democratic country.
Posted on Reply
#33
TheinsanegamerN
Darmok N JaladI agree that 100 hours a month on a hobby/recreation of any kind is probably a bit on the high side. I'm lucky to get an hour a night, but maybe in my younger days, it was more likely. I guess when you consider we used to just watch TV for 3+ hours a day, gaming probably just replaced that habit...maybe. Excessive screen time is definitely not great for us, though.

I don't think OP was saying a limit of any kind is okay, but rather playing games in excess was his point.
My point was that just because a limit seems reasonable, simply by introducing the limit, they have now introduced a new metric which they can crank down on to squeeze you dry. Woldnt surprise me one day to see play time being metered out and "bought" like microtransaction currency. It's like data caps on home internet, just because you usually dont hit it doesnt mean they wont clamp down further on the cap to increase profits.
Posted on Reply
#34
Nater
It makes me chuckle. What's next, little coin slots on our hardware?!
Posted on Reply
#35
Bwaze
I think Nvidia found better things to do with all the hardware they installed with gamers’ money - and yes, it’s AI. So I would expect even harder limitations down the road, sudden quality drop (they can render your game at really low resolution an upscale it, you can’t tell the difference), even total drop outs of service…
Posted on Reply
#36
john_
The 3.6 Trillion company that sells millions of racks and server GPUs, can't add extra hardware to it's GeForce Now servers so "to continue providing exceptional quality and speed—as well as shorter queue times."
Posted on Reply
#37
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
Just stop buying their stuff
Posted on Reply
#38
renz496
so.... who cares? the mass majority are not using this service. even most that discussing how bad this cap here at TPU are not using GFN. real man have rig. and to be honest i was surprise that nvidia still not kill GFN long time ago. they have been keeping this business for more than a decade.
Posted on Reply
#39
Dr. Dro
skizzoseriously, who has time to play video games for 100+ hours a month b:roll:sides this guy!?



I understand the gripe, it's a shitty policy based on principle, but......lol.....wow.....some people don't do moderation well. being addicted to video games is not healthy.
I do more than 100h a week on Genshin alone. :D

I wish I had more time, but I am not quite like that guy yet :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#40
Legacy-ZA
Mghahahhehehahahahahahahbwghagaghahagaggfhehehahahheheehehahhahaha.

Where are our clown emojis? :D

This isn't a service, this is restrictive and invasive, better to just own your own rig.
Posted on Reply
#41
Shihab
skizzoI understand the gripe, it's a shitty policy based on principle, but......lol.....wow.....some people don't do moderation well. being addicted to video games is not healthy.
Same opinion I have on China's video game restrictions for minors (which I'm surprised anyone is yet to compare this one to).

On topic, are we still getting surprised when some cloud service with obviously unsustainble pricing/offering starts to restrict functionality and jack up prices later on?
Posted on Reply
#43
A&P211
RayneYorukaThis, literally
Its how lots of video streaming services started.
Posted on Reply
#44
TheDeeGee
Surprised it's still alive to be honest, seeing every other game streaming platform died swiftly.
Posted on Reply
#45
A&P211
NaterIt makes me chuckle. What's next, little coin slots on our hardware?!
I like to see politicians with little quarter coin slots in their back side. Drop 4 quarters, rent a politician for 10min.
They are old, so they wont have a debit card machine, its all operated by quarters.
Posted on Reply
#46
Chomiq
Great! This is exactly what we need - people to finally realize that GeForce Now isn't there to make your life better - it's there to generate profit for Nvidia.
Posted on Reply
#47
Vayra86
SOAREVERSORThis is the future of PC gaming and it's already locked in.
Yeah, totally, look at how great it is, those price hikes!

Lmao
This ain't going nowhere, but they're trying hard, I agree.
kapone32Thanks but no thanks I will keep my Games on local storage and not bother with this subscription World they are trying to shove down our throats. First MS with it's 365 BS and now this. At least with Game Pass you get to play as long as you want.
No, you're still in a service model with a gatekeeper function, you have and own nothing, and you never will. If MS chooses to monitor and limit playtime you're fucked just the same. They'll just not allow you to get updates, or whatever.

Don't fool yourself. Cloud is always a clusterfuck - even Steam isn't entirely 'safe', it just has the neat quality not costing a monthly fee.
john_The 3.6 Trillion company that sells millions of racks and server GPUs, can't add extra hardware to it's GeForce Now servers so "to continue providing exceptional quality and speed—as well as shorter queue times."
That moment you realize you've created such an inefficient, cloud driven service-model-mess you can't even provide enough juice to keep it all going.

Amazing isn't it. Between AI and RT I bet Nvidia is world leader in wasted energy and E-waste. Crypto bad? Nvidia just says 'hold my beer'.

If this isn't a bubble going to pop, we're in an alternate dimension.
Posted on Reply
#48
Legacy-ZA
Vayra86Yeah, totally, look at how great it is, those price hikes!

Lmao
This ain't going nowhere, but they're trying hard, I agree.


No, you're still in a service model with a gatekeeper function, you have and own nothing, and you never will. If MS chooses to monitor and limit playtime you're fucked just the same. They'll just not allow you to get updates, or whatever.

Don't fool yourself. Cloud is always a clusterfuck - even Steam isn't entirely 'safe', it just has the neat quality not costing a monthly fee.


That moment you realize you've created such an inefficient, cloud driven service-model-mess you can't even provide enough juice to keep it all going.

Amazing isn't it. Between AI and RT I bet Nvidia is world leader in wasted energy and E-waste. Crypto bad? Nvidia just says 'hold my beer'.

If this isn't a bubble going to pop, we're in an alternate dimension.
I really do wish GoG would make it possible that, as it links to your Steam account, it can see what games you already own and unlock the full version of that game on their platform. I want to store them all on a massive HDD, this thing about "you don't own it" after buying digital content is just not working for me, I actually call this theft, but hey, what do I know.

This restriction from nVidia is a joke, I can tell you, I have found myself physically incapacitated in many ways before, that give me more than 10 hours I can waste per day and where I game to keep my mind occupied while recuperating.
Posted on Reply
#49
FoulOnWhite
skizzoseriously, who has time to play video games for 100+ hours a month besides this guy!?



I understand the gripe, it's a shitty policy based on principle, but......lol.....wow.....some people don't do moderation well. being addicted to video games is not healthy.
My mate does



Just goes to show, hardware at home is the winner here.
Posted on Reply
#50
LittleBro
When one plays Starcraft 2 league and has free account, will the game pause for all because the dude gets to view the ad?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 10:21 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts