Monday, December 30th 2024

LG Unveils World's First Bendable 5K2K Gaming Monitor With Dual Mode Support and DP 2.1

LG Electronics (LG) is reinforcing its leadership in premium OLED gaming monitors with the LG UltraGear GX9 series, set to be unveiled at CES 2025 this January. The new lineup includes the 45GX990A - winner of three CES 2025 Innovation Awards, including the prestigious 'Best of Innovation' - and an all-in-one smart gaming monitor powered by LG webOS. These accolades underscore LG's commitment to delivering advanced, high-quality gaming solutions. With the GX9 series, LG continues to demonstrate its leadership in cutting-edge technology and gaming monitor innovation.

To ensure maximum gaming immersion, all UltraGear GX9 series models feature curved display panels employing LG's advanced WOLED technology. These screens offer high brightness, true blacks, stunning colors and optimized curvature; a combination that brings games to life and draws users deeper into the exhilarating action of their favorite titles. Certified for low blue light emissions, the GX9 series provides a more comfortable experience, reducing eye strain during extended gaming sessions. In addition, LG's Anti-Glare & Low Reflection (AGLR) coating minimizes screen reflections and glare, making it easier for gamers to see everything that's happening on screen, even in brighter rooms.

The 45GX990A and 45GX950A are 45-inch, 21:9 gaming monitors featuring ultra-high 5K2K resolution (5,120 x 2,160) - a first for OLED monitors.* Their 21:9 aspect ratio offers a more immersive gaming experience than standard 16:9 displays, while maintaining better content compatibility than 32:9 monitors. With generous screen real estate, these monitors are a great choice not only for gaming but for various different uses.

Both products feature LG's second-generation Dual-Mode, offering customizable aspect ratios (21:9 or 16:9) and picture sizes (39-, 34- or 27-inches) with one-touch switching between preset screen-resolution and refresh-rate combos. With eight configurations, users can personalize their gaming setups to suit their preferences or adapt to different game genres, including FPS, RPG, MOBA and racing simulators.

The World's First Bendable 5K2K Gaming Monitor with Dual-Mode
The LG UltraGear OLED Bendable Gaming Monitor (model 45GX990A) is the world's first 5K2K-resolution bendable OLED display. The 45-inch monitor can smoothly transition from completely flat to a 900R curvature within seconds, offering users incredible flexibility and more control over their gaming experience. Its upgraded Dual-Mode feature allows users to switch effortlessly between resolution and refresh rate presets, and customize the aspect ratio and picture size. With an ultra-fast 0.03 ms (GtG) response time, the 45GX990A ensures smooth gameplay and heightened immersion.

The World's First 45-Inch 5K2K OLED Gaming Monitor with 800R Curvature and DisplayPort 2.1
Another standout model from the new GX9 lineup is the LG UltraGear OLED Gaming Monitor (model 45GX950A). With its curved (800R), 21:9 format 5K2K-resolution self-lit 45-inch panel, this display delivers sharp, lifelike images with the stunning colors and exceptional contrast LG OLED products are known for. Its 4-side Virtually Borderless design and slim bezels help boost users' sense of immersion while adding a sleek aesthetic to any setup. Boasting 125 pixels per-inch (PPI) and an RGWB subpixel layout, the monitor improves the readability of in-game text and makes productivity tasks, such as editing documents or website content, that much easier.

Like its bendable sibling, the 45GX950A features Dual-Mode functionality with eight customizable configurations and supports DisplayPort 2.1, HDMI 2.1 and USB-C with 90 W power delivery. This ensures seamless compatibility with the latest graphics cards and features such as variable refresh rate (VRR) while enabling convenient device charging. Certified by NVIDIA G-SYNC and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, the monitor has reduced screen tearing for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience.

Versatile Smart Gaming Monitor for Seamless Streaming and Immersive Gaming
The brand-new LG UltraGear 39GX90SA is designed to deliver stellar gaming and content-streaming experiences. Powered by webOS, it functions as a home entertainment hub, enabling users to access all their go-to streaming services without a PC or set-top box. It's 39-inch, 21:9 aspect ratio curved (800R) OLED display produces brilliant, nuanced colors and deep, dark blacks, making it perfect for AAA games and HDR movies and series. Equipped with USB Type-C ports, it offers convenient connectivity, and incorporates LG's ergonomic and space-saving L-shaped stand for a clutter-free desk setup.

"The UltraGear GX9 series sets a new standard for OLED gaming monitors, combining groundbreaking display technology with smart features that expand and enhance the user experience," said YS Lee, vice president and head of the IT Business Unit, LG Media Entertainment Solution Company. "From the world's first 5K2K OLED gaming monitors with second-generation Dual-Mode to smart gaming monitors with built-in webOS, the GX9 lineup pushes the boundaries to deliver maximum value and enjoyment for our customers."
Source: LG Electronics
Add your own comment

53 Comments on LG Unveils World's First Bendable 5K2K Gaming Monitor With Dual Mode Support and DP 2.1

#26
FoulOnWhite
Why does a monitor need to bend, it just sits on your desk.
Posted on Reply
#27
milesk182
robert3892Is LG trying to be Corsair now?
Lol, LG makes the screen that's in the Corsair.
FoulOnWhiteWhy does a monitor need to bend, it just sits on your desk.
I agree, although one thought is the 800R curve being quite a lot. Getting it close to the 1800R is better for my needs. The 39 inch will be amazing though, omg I'm so excited!
Posted on Reply
#28
TheLostSwede
News Editor
FoulOnWhiteWhy does a monitor need to bend, it just sits on your desk.
Because some people like a curved monitor when gaming and a flat monitor when working.
Also, it flexes, it doesn't bend, at least not like a phone screen.
Posted on Reply
#29
Cheeseball
Not a Potato
robert3892Is LG trying to be Corsair now?
The Corsair Xeneon Flex did use LG's first 34" OLED panel, which I believe was the bendable version of 34GS95QE-B in early 2023.

5120x2160@165Hz or 2560x1080@330Hz is not bad. Hopefully LG improved their hardware integer scaler.

This doesn't have Pixel Sound right? I don't see it mentioned in the marketing fluff.
Posted on Reply
#30
Baba
AcEVery interesting, I have the smaller brother of those. Where’s the Hz info though? Pricing will be high anyway.
Native 165Hz refresh rate at 5120 x 2160, with the ability then to double the refresh rate to 330Hz if you lower the resolution by half to 2560 x 1080.


12:42 roadmap
Posted on Reply
#31
Tek-Check
Prima.VeraWe need more and cheaper 21:9 34" OLED monitors.
We need more of anything beyond 32 inches which is 4K/2K and 5K/2K.
HyrelAny word on the UHBR of that DisplayPort 2.1? Because that resolution at probably 165Hz 10bit would require over 60Gbps, which means it needs to be UHBR20 in order to run at those specs without DSC. If it's anything less than UHBR20 then it might aswell just have DP2.0.
DP 2.0 is the same as DP 2.1 in terms of bandwidth.

This monitor has to deliver DP80 port. It's going to be expensive and LG MUST deliver the highest bandwidth so that users can choose to run it without DSC should they need to. It's unforgivable to force buyers to use DSC on expensive displays. There will be a huge outcry if LG doesn't deliver on ports.
HyrelIt's not a matter of signal quality, it's just that DSC can introduce some annoyances, like stutters, glitches with multiple displays, taking seconds of screen-freeze to alt-tab in games that don't support (or aren't optimal) Borderless Fullscreen, makes some Nvidia features unusable and so on, that's why I'm mostly interested in DP2.1 primarily so I can run the full specs without DSC.
This perfectly makes sense and monitor vendors MUST finally deliver DP80 ports on any monitor costing more than $700.
AcEIf new GPUs do not have 80 Gbit's DP 2.1 this discussion is kinda moot and you will have to entertain those alleged "glitches".
Nvidia must finally deliver DP80 ports on all GPUs from 70 class and up. It's inexcusable to delay this transition further.

As a reminder, 4090, the most expensive consumer card, cannot run Samsung 57-inch Neo G9 8K/2K monitor at its native refresh rate 240Hz. It can only run it at 120Hz due to crippled DSC video pipeline that was recycled from 3090.

Essentially, Nvidia did not modernise video ports since 2020. They cannot underdeliver anymore and everybody is waiting for them to offer DP80 ports.
Posted on Reply
#32
R0H1T
Tek-CheckThey cannot underdeliver anymore and everybody is waiting for them to offer DP80 ports.
They can definitely do that & get away with it, you underestimate JHH zealots :shadedshu:
Posted on Reply
#33
warrior420
It's crazy to think that a $1,500+ Nvidia GPU, or any Nvidia card currently, cant even run this monitor.
Posted on Reply
#34
Prima.Vera
warrior420It's crazy to think that a $1,500+ Nvidia GPU, or any Nvidia card currently, cant even run this monitor.
It can, and it can do max refresh rate. Where did you get this??
Posted on Reply
#35
AcE
Tek-CheckAs a reminder, 4090, the most expensive consumer card, cannot run Samsung 57-inch Neo G9 8K/2K monitor at its native refresh rate 240Hz.
It can with DSC afaik. I currently use 4K240 with DSC on a 4090. As I said smaller brother of those monitors.
Tek-CheckThey cannot underdeliver anymore and everybody is waiting for them to offer DP80 ports.
DP 2.1 is very likely but full 80 Gbit, who knows, AMD didn’t deliver it first gen and only gave 54Gbit so the same could be happening here as well. As long as all resolutions are handled it’s fine and with DP2.1 that’s easily the case, even 54Gbit so I don’t see a reason to panic.
Tek-CheckEssentially, Nvidia did not modernise video ports since 2020.
Btw DP 1.4 is much older than that. ;) Goes back to GTX 10 series. But it was enough for a long long time.
Posted on Reply
#36
Asni
TheLostSwedeNo, that is a link to the EXACT press release above. There is ZERO extra information there.
I don't get it. You just linked the LG website which is pointless.
Posted on Reply
#37
TheLostSwede
News Editor
AsniI don't get it. You just linked the LG website which is pointless.
It's also pointless to link to the exact same text and pictures.
And no, it's not pointless for TPU as a site to link to LG, but when available, I always link to the product page, of which there is none yet, for either product.
Posted on Reply
#38
Tek-Check
AcEIt can with DSC afaik. I currently use 4K240 with DSC on a 4090
4K/240Hz works, but 8K/2K/240Hz doesn't work, it hasn't been fixed and it will not be fixed until Nvidia introduces new cards with upgraded video pipeline.
Posted on Reply
#39
AcE
Tek-Check4K/240Hz works, but 8K/2K/240Hz doesn't work, it hasn't been fixed and it will not be fixed until Nvidia introduces new cards with upgraded video pipeline.
It matters a low amount, because the fps you will reach at that resolution will be too low anyway to profit from 240Hz. The maximum then is 144/165 or whatever, probably 240 with 4:2:0 chroma sampling. That monitor is for what, triple A gaming? Good luck reaching enough fps in AAA games with a 4090 at that resolution, without significantly reducing settings (and using something like dlss ultra perf).

Yep, just calculated it, 7680x2160, which isn’t even real 8K, it’s just 4K Ultra Wide, uses DOUBLE the amount of pixel of 4K. You will never be able to make use of 240Hz with any current GPU anyway, so it was never a real detriment to 4090 not reaching 240Hz on that monitor. That monitor is for maximum 60-100 fps AAA gaming and maybe 120-144 in simulators that don’t need much performance.
Posted on Reply
#40
Tek-Check
AcEso it was never a real detriment to 4090 not reaching 240Hz on that monitor. That monitor is for maximum 60-100 fps AAA gaming and maybe 120-144 in simulators that don’t need much performance.
That monitor is not for gaming only, but for productivity too. If I buy the most expensive consumer GPU in the world, it MUST make sure that it's able to drive the full picture on such monitor, which is dual 4K/240Hz. I want to be able to scroll smoothly through my large documents if I pay almost 2,000 bucks for GPU.

I don't care much about gaming framerates. I care about paying a fortune for the GPU that cannot drive full picture on this monitor, whereas Intel and AMD cards can, as those have updated DSC video pipeline.

It's an utter joke that Nvidia recycled DSC video pipeline from PCB on 3090 and reused it unchanged on 4090, while charging consumers a fortune for new card with old video hardware. How many times would people still try to defend what cannot be defended in any circumstances?
Posted on Reply
#41
AcE
Tek-CheckThat monitor is not for gaming only, but for productivity too.
And productivity never ever needs 240 Hz, they mostly work with 60 Hz. To the contrary.
Tek-CheckI want to be able to scroll smoothly through my large documents if I pay almost 2,000 bucks for GPU.
So "less than 240 Hz" (= 144-165 Hz) equals "unsmooth" to you, got it. Good luck with that weird definition. btw, the vast majority of humanity considers 60 Hz smooth.
Tek-CheckI care about paying a fortune for the GPU that cannot drive full picture on this monitor
Hz has nothing to do with "full picture", that is merely a higher rate of repeating the same picture. In other words you will not have decreased quality with a RTX 40 series card.
Posted on Reply
#42
warrior420
Indie games are a thing... And they would look killer on this monitor maxed out.
Posted on Reply
#43
Tek-Check
AcEHz has nothing to do with "full picture", that is merely a higher rate of repeating the same picture. In other words you will not have decreased quality with a RTX 40 series card.
The full picture capability of that monitor includes its higher refresh rate.

You can keep trying to split the hair in half, but the simple fact is that 4090 is not capable of running the full video spec of that monitor. Not sure how else to explain such simple observation.
Posted on Reply
#44
AcE
Tek-CheckThe full picture capability of that monitor includes its higher refresh rate.
Full picture means full quality, full resolution, HDR things like that, not Hz, which is just frequency. Literally also "full picture" means if the card can even use the monitor at all.
Tek-CheckYou can keep trying to split the hair in half, but the simple fact is that 4090 is not capable of running the full video spec of that monitor. Not sure how else to explain such simple observation.
I never said anything else, I just said that it's pretty unrelevant, the resolution with 240 Hz is so high that it's undrivable / unusable anyway, and with the 5090 it is more usable - the 5090 will have DP2.1 probably, so everything has its place. I have 4K240 here, and even that is too much for a 4090 aside from a few games, and you are talking about double that amount of performance needed :D The monitor is simply too extreme you could say. I even doubt 5090 will be able to properly use it. With 50% more performance than 4090 maybe, it's far away from being able to properly drive the monitor in 240 Hz in 2x4K. 16 million pixels.
Posted on Reply
#45
Tek-Check
AcEFull picture means full quality, full resolution, HDR things like that, not Hz, which is just frequency.
No. Monitor picture capability includes refresh rate, in addition to all other features mentioned. Period. There's no if or but here.
AcEI just said that it's pretty unrelevant, the resolution with 240 Hz is so high that it's undrivable / unusable anyway,
No, it's not irrelevant. The difference in smoothness and blur between 120Hz and 240Hz in document scrolling and other moving threads is substantial, especially if the monitor is used in productivity workloads in several industries.

The fact that 4090 is not capable of running basic picture on this monitor to its full refresh rate at 240Hz is a disgrace on Nvidia's part and inexcusable omission in lack of upgrade of DSC video pipeline on entire 4000 series of cards.

Again, there are no ifs and no buts here. It is what it is and this monitor simply exposed what Nvidia did not deliver in video pipeline. There are threads about this specific issue and solution will not be available due to hardware limitation.
Posted on Reply
#46
Easy Rhino
Linux Advocate
I had an LG Ultragear 2 years ago and the connections kept dying on me. No support from LG. I will never buy again.
Posted on Reply
#47
Tek-Check
Easy RhinoI had an LG Ultragear 2 years ago and the connections kept dying on me. No support from LG. I will never buy again.
Did you not use warranty conditions?
Posted on Reply
#48
Easy Rhino
Linux Advocate
Tek-CheckDid you not use warranty conditions?
Only 1 year warranty.
Posted on Reply
#49
FoulOnWhite
That’s the special 1yr countdown chip that activates on first power up, 1yr later, item fails. We had a 55” Toshiba that failed after about 55 weeks
Posted on Reply
#50
Nater
FoulOnWhiteThat’s the special 1yr countdown chip that activates on first power up, 1yr later, item fails. We had a 55” Toshiba that failed after about 55 weeks
My 34GK950 or whatever is in my sig did that. Bad flickering 3 days before the warranty was up. Took LG like 6 weeks to get me a new one, that is still running today like 4 years later.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 4th, 2025 17:11 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts