Tuesday, February 11th 2025

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 16 GB Variants Deemed Fake, Insiders Insist SKU is 8 GB Only

According to early February reportage, Team Green's GeForce RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti graphics cards are expected to launch onto market next month. Very basic technical information has leaked online; insiders reckon that both product tiers will be utilizing the NVIDIA "Blackwell" GB206 GPU. Rumors have swirled regarding intended VRAM configurations—loose online declarations point to variants being prepared with 8 or 16 GB of GDDR7 VRAM, on a 128-bit bus. Regulatory filings indicate two different configs with the eventual arrival of GeForce RTX 5060 Ti models, but certain industry watchdogs insist that the GeForce RTX 5060 SKU will be an 8 GB-only product.

A curious-looking ZOTAC Trinity OC White Edition GeForce RTX 5060 16 GB variant surfaced via a TikTok video—post-analysis, expert eyes declared that the upload contained doctored material. A BenchLife.info report pointed to a notable inconsistency on the offending item's retail packaging: "DLSS 3 should not appear on the GeForce RTX 50 series box, because the Blackwell GPU architecture focuses on DLSS 4." The publication presented evidence of ZOTAC RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Trinity OC White Edition box art being repurposed in the TikToker's video. Hardware soothsayer MEGAsizeGPU added their two cents: "this is fake. There is no plan for a GeForce RTX 5060 16 GB, and the box is photoshopped from the last-gen ZOTAC box." At the end of their report, BenchLife reckons that NVIDIA has not sent a "GeForce RTX 5060 color box template" to its board partners.
Sources: BenchLife, Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

19 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 16 GB Variants Deemed Fake, Insiders Insist SKU is 8 GB Only

#1
mtosev
8gb isn't much vram for 2025.
Posted on Reply
#2
Darmok N Jalad
8GB is getting pretty tight these days. I only play at 1080p or 1440p, and some games exceed 8GB without hesitation.
Posted on Reply
#3
_roman_
It'S an entry level graphic card for basic tasks.
Posted on Reply
#4
Quicks
_roman_It'S an entry level graphic card for basic tasks.
Please tell that to Nvidia that want to charge 400$+ for a basic card doing basic tasks.
Posted on Reply
#5
InVasMani
More VRAM and rasterization performance would make more sense on a $400 GPU overall than pushing RT, but what do I know. I mean it's got plenty of VRAM at 8GB if you just render in black and white who needs color it worked in the 1950's it should be acceptable for 2025.
Posted on Reply
#6
Darmok N Jalad
_roman_It'S an entry level graphic card for basic tasks.
You say that like it’s an iGPU. This card will be bought up by gamers in droves.
Posted on Reply
#7
GodisanAtheist
The argument always revolves around price. If NV was offering the xx60 class cards at $200 with 8GB of VRAM, there wouldn't be much room to complain.

But they're not, they're asking for $300 for starters, and still offering 8GB at the $400+ level. When you're turning down basic texture settings (which do a lot to improve visual fidelity with a very low computational cost when there is enough VRAM) or cannot even use all the VRAM hungry features of your card at $400 there is a problem.
Posted on Reply
#8
Darmok N Jalad
GodisanAtheistThe argument always revolves around price. If NV was offering the xx60 class cards at $200 with 8GB of VRAM, there wouldn't be much room to complain.

But they're not, they're asking for $300 for starters, and still offering 8GB at the $400+ level. When you're turning down basic texture settings (which do a lot to improve visual fidelity with a very low computational cost when there is enough VRAM) or cannot even use all the VRAM hungry features of your card at $400 there is a problem.
They want to upsell you. They know they have customers by the snarglies, or they wouldn’t ask so much for what once was a mid-grade gaming line.
Posted on Reply
#9
InVasMani
It seems like it's just going to make the B580 look that much better in terms of overall value considerations. A lot of people will settle on that GPU instead I imagine.
Posted on Reply
#10
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
Reality check time.

That 0.1 higher FPS from double the VRAM, while the 8 GB card still beats its 12 and 16 GB competition.

This is before you factor in RTX cards having a competent upscaler (compared to the competition).

Surely worth $50-100 more for that 0.1 FPS /s

The only reasonable argument for the 16 GB xx60 variants was for professional workloads, but lets face it, if you're doing "professional" work, you can probably afford more than $400 for your GPU.

Posted on Reply
#11
Darmok N Jalad
dgianstefaniReality check time.

That 0.1 higher FPS from double the VRAM, while the 8 GB card still beats its 12 and 16 GB competition.

This is before you factor in RTX cards having a competent upscaler (compared to the competition).

Surely worth $50-100 more for that 0.1 FPS /s

The only reasonable argument for the 16 GB xx60 variants was for professional workloads, but lets face it, if you're doing "professional" work, you can probably afford more than $400 for your GPU.

So I’m just imagining the 10-11GB of VRAM usage I see in games at 1080/1440, or is that Windows hallucinating?
Posted on Reply
#12
Tomgang
If rtx 5060 is only 8 gb vram. Avoid it.

I just tried playing stalker 2 with my rtx 4060 and well it was not a pleasant play throw. I had to go down to 1080P medium settings before it was somewhat playerble. Not do to gpu dit not had enough grunt. It had. But when i ran out of vram and could go from 150 fps with dlss and fg and down to measly 30 -40 fps when i hit vram limit and response and enter menu was slow as hell.

Avoid at all costs 8 gb vram gpu's. Its not a pleasant gaming on new games. Yes i only tried 1 so far, but i think more games will run terribly on 8 gb vram cards even though the gpu has enough grunt to do so.

8 gb vram cards is a dying breed of gpu's. Avoid and don't buy. You will probably regret it
Posted on Reply
#13
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
Darmok N JaladSo I’m just imagining the 10-11GB of VRAM usage I see in games at 1080/1440, or is that Windows hallucinating?
Allocation ≠ usage.
Posted on Reply
#14
Mrgravia
From what I understand, doubling the Vram only really makes a difference if the memory bus is fast enough to populate it.
Posted on Reply
#15
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
MrgraviaFrom what I understand, doubling the Vram only really makes a difference if the memory bus is fast enough to populate it.
The GPU itself also needs to be fast enough to make use of it for games.
Posted on Reply
#16
SirB
_roman_It'S an entry level graphic card for basic tasks.
So is my RTX3060 12 GB. See that? 12GB vram. 8 is a joke in 2025.
dgianstefaniThe GPU itself also needs to be fast enough to make use of it for games.
My 3060 handles 12 GB just fine. Halo uses all of it on big maps @3440x1440. MSFS as well.
Posted on Reply
#17
sudothelinuxwizard
This will make zero sense to buy above a used 3060 unless you use it for Folding@Home and light gaming. You'll probably save 200 euros, and you can even try and nab a EVGA one, which is much better then the current offerings that are for the most part engineering trainwrecks with shitty warranties.
Posted on Reply
#18
Darc Requiem
8GB is beyond absurd at this point. The RX 480 launched with 8GB of VRAM for $239 in July of 2016.
Posted on Reply
#19
InVasMani
I sure the hell am not buying a new 8GB GPU ever in 2025 or beyond unless you can just prove that past VRAM GPU limitations are a obsolete consideration today and into the future.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Feb 11th, 2025 15:39 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts