Thursday, February 13th 2025

Sapphire Radeon NITRO+ RX 9070 Series Promo Images Leaked Online

Sapphire is readying multiple Radeon RX 9070 custom designs for next month's launch; official announcements and leaks have revealed upcoming PURE, PULSE and NITRO+ cards. The latter was identified in AMD's CES 2025 press material, but no demonstration sample turned up at last month's Las Vegas AIB roundup. A lone fuzzy low-resolution screengrab showcased the premium Radeon RX 9070 series card's hefty and blocky triple-slot profile. An hour or two ago, Everest (aka Olrak29) uploaded two alleged promotional images to social media. Thankfully, the leaked shots have arrived with decent pixel definition. Sapphire has initiated staggered marketing campaigns for its lower-end and mid-range RDNA 4 cards, so the latest leak has most likely preempted an upcoming official reveal of (possible) NITRO+ Radeon RX 9070 XT and RX 9070 cards.

Sapphire reserves the crème de la crème of feature sets for its premium-tier NITRO+ designs. Previous-gen examples were substantial prospects, and the incoming design is touted to continue that dimensional legacy. Well-heeled Team Red enthusiasts will welcome an updated triple-fan configuration and somewhat subtle internal ARGB lighting zones. The leaked card sports a luxurious "champagne gold" tinted shroud and backplate, with an optional detachable panel. The vented side plates sport a lighter-hue, but the elaborate triangular cut-out aesthetic could be off-putting to certain connoisseurs. Press outlets have honed in on the new NITRO+ model's hidden power connector design, potentially leading to a single input—utilizing a 12 or 16-pin interface.
Sources: Olrak29 Tweet, VideoCardz, Wccftech
Add your own comment

24 Comments on Sapphire Radeon NITRO+ RX 9070 Series Promo Images Leaked Online

#1
remekra
If only there would be 9080XT or 9090XT I would definitely go for Nitro+. Loved the look of 7900XTX and love the look of that one.
Posted on Reply
#2
Erazor6000
It looks beefy! The TDP won't be below 350W for sure.
Posted on Reply
#3
usiname
It looks like brick, literally
Posted on Reply
#4
Beermotor
Erazor6000It looks beefy! The TDP won't be below 350W for sure.
Possibly. Sapphire cranked up the power on the 7900XTX Nitro+ to something absurd and it regularly hits well over 400 watts.
If they release an OC 9070XT with over-the-top cooling it might be interesting.
Posted on Reply
#5
3valatzy
The exhaust openings are too far away from the chip.
The openings should be cut in the PCB right next to the GPU but on the left side, so the direct aiflow will hit the GPU and cool accordingly.
Of course, with such a design, the PCB must be longer and the components (power delivery circuitry, VRAM pool, traces, etc.) moved to the GPU's right side.

Posted on Reply
#6
LabRat 891
T0@stPress outlets have honed in on the new NITRO+ model's hidden power connector design, potentially leading to a single input—utilizing a 12 or 16-pin interface.
TBQH, the controversy with the 5090 and 4090 has me thinking the +12VHPWR/2x6 isn't *as* bad as it seemed.
From Buildzoid (and others') work, we now know the issue has to do with phase/conductor balancing (at high loads, near or above the 600W spec).

So, if:
A. The card can never draw *anywhere* near 600W
and/or
B. The card has proper phase balancing
I might not actively avoid it (just because of the Burny 3.0 power connector)
Posted on Reply
#7
Cheeseball
Not a Potato
Card looks good, but still overengineered and oversized. If its not 2.5 slot and below for something that doesn't beat the 7900XT/7900XTX, then its taking up too much space.
Posted on Reply
#8
kapone32
I struggle with why this card is so large. 3full slots and those look like 100mm fans too. These are too big for the Specs we have.
Posted on Reply
#9
Hecate91
The detachable backplate is neat, but I wouldn't want one if it has the 16 pin connector.
Posted on Reply
#10
kapone32
Hecate91The detachable backplate is neat, but I wouldn't want one if it has the 16 pin connector.
The funny thing is all new PSUs come with that. I thought only As Rock were going with this?
Posted on Reply
#11
TheDeeGee
Oh right, the good old sacrifice heatsink surface area to hide a cable, lol
Posted on Reply
#12
Chrispy_
Potato quality is too potato, but I doubt it's 16-pin as in 12VHPWR or 12V-6X2 simply because there seem to be two of them. I doubt this GPU needs 1200W:

Posted on Reply
#13
remekra
Chrispy_Potato quality is too potato, but I doubt it's 16-pin as in 12VHPWR or 12V-6X2 simply because there seem to be two of them. I doubt this GPU needs 1200W:

Second one is ARGB connector I would bet. They had the same on 7900XTX, even in the same place.
Posted on Reply
#14
Hecate91
kapone32The funny thing is all new PSUs come with that. I thought only As Rock were going with this?
I think the 16 pin connector would be fine with current sensors and pin load balancing on the GPU side, power consumption limited to 400W or less.
The AsRock Taichi has a 16 pin connector, but it makes even less sense here, Sapphire seems to be using it for the sake of hiding the power connector. I'd personally rather have function over form with 3x 8 pin connectors.
Posted on Reply
#15
Chrispy_
remekraSecond one is ARGB connector I would bet. They had the same on 7900XTX, even in the same place.
Ah yes, you're probably right. I had a 7800XT Nitro with ARGB and case fan headers. It's entirely possible that neither of these are power connectors, It's possibly two of the following:
  • BIOS selector switch
  • ARGB connector
  • Case fan 4-pin PWM header
Hecate91I think the 16 pin connector would be fine with current sensors and pin load balancing on the GPU side, power consumption limited to 400W or less.
IMO 12VHPWR/12V-6X2 connector is good for 250-300W. It's six 12V pairs and we've been calling a MiniFit Jr 12V wire pair good for 50W for the last 15 years, so the smaller 12V-6X2 connector gets a pass for no more than 50W per wire, and that's being generous.

People (me included) are quick to blame the 16-pin HPWR/6X2 connector but it's actually an improvement on PCIe, since it's about the size of an 6+2 or 8-pin PCIe connector but those are only rated to 150W and I'd be perfectly comfortably using the new, smaller connector for up to 250W.
Posted on Reply
#16
Gmr_Chick
Man, I really miss the look of the older Nitro+ cards; once the 7000 series hit, they turned the damn things into literal bricks and that trend continues here.
Posted on Reply
#17
LittleBro
Chrispy_Potato quality is too potato, but I doubt it's 16-pin as in 12VHPWR or 12V-6X2 simply because there seem to be two of them. I doubt this GPU needs 1200W:

On the left that's BIOS switch, on right that's ARGB.
Chrispy_People (me included) are quick to blame the 16-pin HPWR/6X2 connector but it's actually an improvement on PCIe, since it's about the size of an 6+2 or 8-pin PCIe connector but those are only rated to 150W and I'd be perfectly comfortably using the new, smaller connector for up to 250W.
Shrinking down connector to safety factor of 1.1 is only improvement in terms on cost savings. Definitely not improvement safety-wise.
Posted on Reply
#18
PLAfiller
It's bricky and it's bricky aaaand it's gorgeous and I am not part of the price range it's targeted to. :P
Posted on Reply
#20
Chrispy_
mate123This screams 1000$+...:(
Not going to happen with the 4070Ti Super selling for $850-900 still. Those sub-$700 7900XTs are a threat to overpriced 9070XT's too.
Posted on Reply
#21
Denver
Chrispy_Not going to happen with the 4070Ti Super selling for $850-900 still. Those sub-$700 7900XTs are a threat to overpriced 9070XT's too.
These products are reaching the end of their lifecycle and will soon vanish from stores... Furthermore, This likely suggests that AMD is utilizing a 4nm process optimized for clock speeds, pushing extra voltage; N4X. AIBs will leverage this to maximize performance (and TDP) to their fullest potential.

Posted on Reply
#22
remekra
DenverThese products are reaching the end of their lifecycle and will soon vanish from stores... Furthermore, This likely suggests that AMD is utilizing a 4nm process optimized for clock speeds, pushing extra voltage; N4X. AIBs will leverage this to maximize performance (and TDP) to their fullest potential.

You could easily push 460W to Nitro+ 7900XTX. That's how I was running it and it's not dynamic like nvidia wattage, it always will push to be at the power limit.
It's probably going to be the same here, reference will be 300-350W while board partners will be free to do what they like. Considering I was reaching 2800-2900MHz with XTX, those 9070XTs should be able to do 3100-3300.
5080 which is on 4N, I have one and its easily running all day with 3100-3200MHz so yeah we have reached 3GHz.

They should release later 9070XT 3GHz Edition :D
Posted on Reply
#23
BlaezaLite
So this card kind of looks alright. Apart from it was designed with a ruler and pencil. Powercolor still have my money, if I had some that is.
Posted on Reply
#24
medi01
And people expect these to go for $550?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Feb 18th, 2025 20:04 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts