Saturday, August 30th 2008

NVIDIA Updates Chip Package Materials, 55nm GPUs subject to Changes too

A product change notification (PCN) document by NVIDIA The Inquirer claims to have access to, indicates changes to the bump materials of several NVIDIA graphics processors (GPUs). Affected by this change are popular GPUs such as G92 and G92b (55nm). Changes include replacement of a High-Pb solder (95% Pb / 5% Sn) bump material with Eutectic Solder (63% Sn / 37% Pb). Bumps are those parts of the die that establish electrical contact with the leads/pins of the FC-BGA package. Failures of these bumps are irreparable leading to permanent damage. This follows several events that lead to NVIDIA owning up defects in certain mobile graphics and MCP parts.

Implications of this PCN are:
  • Current G92 and G92b are weaker and could be subject to failures similar to those products already diagnosed with failing packages and official announcements issued.

  • This could just be a precautionary measure by NVIDIA since these changes according to the PCN are aimed "to increase supply and enhance package robustness" according to the PCN. In other words, better safe than sorry.
  • Sourcing bump-processing services from a single provider is more economical than several providers doing it, as was the case with the recent mobile GPU failure fiasco. Mobile GPUs aren't much different from regular ones per say.
A list of affected products, according to the PCN is provided. It carries the PCN number of PCN0346A. It has the "PCN Submit Date" of June 13, 2008, "Planned Implementation Date" of July 28, 2008, and a "Proposed First Ship Date for change" of August 17, 2008 which makes it likely that none of the products available in the market as of now use this "robust" silicon packaging material. The G92 and G92b processors go into making popular graphics cards such as GeForce 8800 GT, 8800 GTS 512M, 9800 GT, 9800 GTX, 9800 GTX+, etc.
Add your own comment

27 Comments on NVIDIA Updates Chip Package Materials, 55nm GPUs subject to Changes too

#26
Hayder_Master
btarunrIf there are 1000 GeForce users and 100 Radeon users, if 20 Radeon cards fail, it becomes a big issue, cause for concern...but if 20 GeForce cards fail, it isn't as big, a smaller proportion failed. Part of Charlie's usual poop-o-rama was that NV goes bankrupt if it's made to replace existing G92 parts. Take it with a crate of salt.

Be optimistic, my G92 survived the Indian summer of 45 C room-temp (when the AC failed for a week). It's full of heart.
right my friend me too , but sometimes go over 50C my room-temp in iraq and my card temp is 60C go up 70C to 75c when i run games
Posted on Reply
#27
DarkMatter
hayder.masterright my friend me too , but sometimes go over 50C my room-temp in iraq and my card temp is 60C go up 70C to 75c when i run games
Now compare those temps, with my card that is exactly the same one as yours. It tops out around 60-65 on hottests summer days. Now extrapolate that difference to HD4xxx cards and you will understand what I was talking about.

EDIT: Ups I thought this post was on the Ati Furmark thread. I had both threads opened at the same time and you had the last post on both IIRC. Anyway it's what I was taling about in that thread. ;)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jul 2nd, 2024 02:56 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts