Tuesday, May 26th 2009

Intel Delays Launch of Core i5 Platform

Intel's Core i5 series marks the consumer mainstream entry of the Nehalem architecture, in a bid to propagate quad-core processors, at the same time letting the market digest existing inventories of dual-core processors, and making sure its foundries are well-oiled to cater to the 32 nm process, Intel is giving its "Lynnfield" quad-core processor a quarter's head-start. Taiwanese industry observer DigiTimes notes that the platform' debut may have been delayed by a little over a month.

Originally slated for July, the industry debut of Lynnfield and its launch companion, Intel P55 chipset, have been pushed to early September. Stocks of the processors and compatible motherboards however, will be in time for the launch. The processors may be available to retailers about a week ahead, in late August itself, while compatible motherboards even earlier, in mid-August.

Intel plans to start the lineup with three models (yet to be named), clocked at 2.66 GHz, 2.80 GHz, and 2.93 GHz, and priced at US $194, $284, and $562 respectively (in 1000-unit tray quantities). Major motherboard vendors such as ASUS, Gigabyte, and MSI have already displayed some of their first compatible motherboards. The P55 chipset itself is expected to be priced at $40.
Source: DigiTimes
Add your own comment

34 Comments on Intel Delays Launch of Core i5 Platform

#26
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
zAAmOk, so maybe you'll be able to overclock the 2.6GHz to 2.9Ghz at most? If you trick Speedstep into thinking that only one core is at full capacity and none of the others are working it'll raise the multiplier to 22x from 20x. Still that isn't a very large overclock... But I guess if you can get an overclock like that instead of paying double for the 2.9GHz I can fully understand :p

Also, I'm not sure on what level they 'tricked' Speedstep? On the motherboard/northbridge/cpu/somewhere in between. Maybe Intel will still rip out the sneakiness and keep that from happening. lol

All I'm saying is that they'll probably try to hinder you from overclocking since the i7's sales would drop since they'd then be targeting the upper enthusiasts...
its on the motherboard side the tricked it for sure, BIOS level i believe. its not hard for the BIOS to deliberately give false readings, since the BIOS programmers need to know everything to write the BIOS in the first place.
Posted on Reply
#27
h3llb3nd4
Come on!! I want to see i5 now!!
Posted on Reply
#28
ShadowFold
I thought they were making 100-200$ dual cores too? What's the point of this if these cost the same as i7.
Posted on Reply
#29
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
ShadowFoldI thought they were making 100-200$ dual cores too? What's the point of this if these cost the same as i7.
the CPU's may end up in a similar price range (most expensive i5 matches midrange i7, for example), but the motherboards sure wont be. they'll be far less complicated in design with less PCI-E lanes, less memory slots (so less wiring) and cheaper northbridges.
Posted on Reply
#30
PlanetCyborg
Musselsthe CPU's may end up in a similar price range (most expensive i5 matches midrange i7, for example), but the motherboards sure wont be. they'll be far less complicated in design with less PCI-E lanes, less memory slots (so less wiring) and cheaper northbridges.
knowing intels past you bet they will cost same:banghead:
Posted on Reply
#31
mdbrotha03
Core I5

The Core I5 doesn't use QPI. It uses DMI. It uses a dual channel DDR3 controller.
Posted on Reply
#32
farlex85
That sucks, lack of competition is slowing things down, but I suppose most don't particularly need these anyway.
Posted on Reply
#34
Shadin
With those prices, it looks like we're slipping back into the P4 days. Unless they get a lot more competitive, I'll be sticking with my 775 Quad for as long as GPU upgrades can keep me gaming on it.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 30th, 2024 16:00 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts