Friday, July 31st 2009

Core i9 ''Gulftown'' Comes to Life

Intel's posterboy processor for the 32 nm Westmere architecture, the six-core Gulftown is now living, breathing silicon. The company seems to have already dispatched samples of the chip. Gulftown is based on the LGA-1366 socket. Featuring 6 cores and 12 threads with HyperThreading enabled, it holds 12 MB of L3 cache to support the additional data load over the QuickPath Interconnect.

A noted enthusiast has two Gulftown processors running in a dual-socket setup. This 12 core, 24 thread monstrosity uses 24 GB of DDR3 memory using 4 GB modules (perhaps 2 x 3 modules). The processors are running at 2.40 GHz (18 x 133 MHz). The machine was put through WPrime multi-threaded benchmark. It crunched WPrime 32M in a little over 6 seconds, and 1024M in 145.6 seconds. Going by older information, Gulftown should be implemented in a commercial product in Q1 2010, when Intel plans a host of other important product launches. When released as Core i9, the processor will target the premium enthusiast market.
Source: XtremeSystems Forums
Add your own comment

93 Comments on Core i9 ''Gulftown'' Comes to Life

#76
REVHEAD
This is not needed for gaming and wont be another 2 to 4 years away untill it is, most are struggling to multi thread for 2 cores and as for 4 cores I am yet to see a game were all 4 cores are @ 100% cpu usage.

Devs code for Console then port for PC these days, so even thinking about 6 cores or 8 isnt even in there ballpark, rushing to upgrade to this I9 is great for picking up other like minded geeks on the net if your into that kind of thing, but it certainly wont help you get the chicks, or even help your FPS in Real world games, but for benchmarking I can see it helping a great deal, as they can slap a refresh patch out for 3dmarks to help use the cores, but for coding a whole game I cant see it.

This chip would be great for a server, AMD are allready in the 8 core era and Intel know they had to bring soemthing out to compete.
Posted on Reply
#77
Animalpak
REVHEADThis is not needed for gaming and wont be another 2 to 4 years away untill it is, most are struggling to multi thread for 2 cores and as for 4 cores I am yet to see a game were all 4 cores are @ 100% cpu usage.

Devs code for Console then port for PC these days, so even thinking about 6 cores or 8 isnt even in there ballpark, rushing to upgrade to this I9 is great for picking up other like minded geeks on the net if your into that kind of thing, but it certainly wont help you get the chicks, or even help your FPS in Real world games, but for benchmarking I can see it helping a great deal, as they can slap a refresh patch out for 3dmarks to help use the cores, but for coding a whole game I cant see it.

This chip would be great for a server, AMD are allready in the 8 core era and Intel know they had to bring soemthing out to compete.
You need this for get the chicks.


Posted on Reply
#79
ShiBDiB
new games coming out still dont all support 4 cores.... this is definetly overkill for a gamer
Posted on Reply
#80
Kreij
Senior Monkey Moderator
ShiBDiBnew games coming out still dont all support 4 cores.... this is definetly overkill for a gamer
The word "overkill" is not in the vocabulary of most hard core TPU people, and if I remember correctly, using the word "overkill" on TPU can get you an infraction :laugh:

Anyway, you are right in that many games do not support the cores, but the newer games will. It is for that reason that people building gaming rigs should not shun multi-core processors as it will make their rig a bit more future-proof.
Posted on Reply
#81
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Core i7 is more than enough for every game out there. Core i9 is only really useful for heavy, multithreaded applications (CAD, research, etc.).


Newer games won't because most of the market is still running dual-cores. Quad-core has to be mainstream before we start seeing some games that could put hexa-core to work.
Posted on Reply
#82
Konceptz
Finally, my 9770 replacement is alive.....:)
Posted on Reply
#83
A Cheese Danish
If I were to get one of these, I would probably use it strictly for folding/crunching, and maybe some leisure time merryment.
Gotta be able to play games at max settings every once in a while :)
Posted on Reply
#84
HammerON
The Watchful Moderator
Imagine running Bionic WCG with this CPU ~
Oh the possibilities:)
Posted on Reply
#85
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
I would be buying the Xeon version instead of the Core i9 version in a server. Better to run 24/7. ;)
Posted on Reply
#87
buggalugs
I dont think its completely true that 6 cores is useless. Even if games are not coded for more than 2 cores the new windows7 and DX11 has features for offloading onto as many cores as available.

Then again they made a lot of promises for DX 10 that didnt really pan out, i guess we have to wait and see.
Posted on Reply
#88
Nick89
I'm just going to skip all these new processors until I can get an affordable 8-12 core processor.

My PII 940 should hold me over till then.
Posted on Reply
#89
legends84
Nick89I'm just going to skip all these new processors until I can get an affordable 8-12 core processor.

My PII 940 should hold me over till then.
+1:rockout:
Posted on Reply
#90
tastegw
if they make the i9 920 version and price it $400 or less, im getting one and never looking back.

vantage would love this paired with a few next gen nvidia cards.
Posted on Reply
#91
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
So i assume that Core i9 is 2-way only where Core i7 is 1-way only only???
Posted on Reply
#92
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
eidairaman1So i assume that Core i9 is 2-way only where Core i7 is 1-way only only???
No, there will be Xeon 2P parts, Xeon 1P, and Core i9 1P, just like how the current Bloomfield/Nehalem has Xeon 2P, 1P, Core i7 1P. Maybe there's a Core i9 2P for Skulltrail II platform too, I don't know.
Posted on Reply
#93
laszlo
nice cpu but i don't thing i'll ever have one because i don't need it;even if future games or softs will be written to use multicore cpu's i think a quad will be enough for me and a lot of users also

just remember when the 1st quad appeared a few years ago how many softs were written to use it except the benchmark ones....even now is poorly implemented the point is we need better softs now not cpu's
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 1st, 2024 17:34 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts