Monday, December 5th 2011

Intel Has 14 nm Test Circuits In The Lab, Limited Teaser Info Released

Nordic Hardware has scored an exclusive interview with Pat Bliemer, Managing Director of Intel Northern Europe to discuss the technology following on from the 22 nm one used in the upcoming Ivy Bridge processors. Unfortunately, Bliemer was light on the technical details of this technology and didn't say when it would see the light of day, except to say that it will make fuller use of the Tri-Gate tech being used in the Ivy Bridge processors and that test circuits are running.
We need to keep going and you can trust me that in our labs we actually have the next generation after 22nm running, so we need to keep going.[...]I cannot really disclose more about that other than that in a laboratory-environment, absolutely we do have the path, our engineers do have the path to actually go and produce 14nm products. There are many variables that you can play with of course it is not the right name for it and the engineers would not like it when I say play, that you can influence to actually go and stay to that model. And I think the breakthrough we had now with the 3D metal gates, just the design of the gate will actually allow for much more efficient thermals and power.
Back in July, we looked even further ahead and reported that Intel aims to have 10 nm-based processors by 2018 and that the 14 nm tech is due for release around 2014. Watch this space.
Add your own comment

39 Comments on Intel Has 14 nm Test Circuits In The Lab, Limited Teaser Info Released

#26
Unregistered
Amd need a ufo packed with nice shiz to crash into their main office.
#27
TheoneandonlyMrK
AMD's going nowhere by the time intel have brought out their 2016 broadwell and prior haswell chip the whole computing world may have changed with gpu compute power being used natively and aggressively by the os and all software which would make a 2016 amd APU perform on par with intels finest in computational terms and amd are well ahead of intel in that area plus x86 might itself be the old horse by then.

with arms 2016 offerings being more to pc users tastes all in all no one horse race on the horizon plus nv will be making cpu's by 2016 and everyone can use gate last technologies not just intel tri gate ,and what. you think other devs have stood still, that insults the many other chip cos dev department teams im sure they will at least try and compete though it might not even be relevant by 2016 times change and fast.
Posted on Reply
#28
_JP_
But...but...but I'm still on 45nm! :(
Posted on Reply
#29
TheoneandonlyMrK
i just blew my 45 up tut

cant bring myself to change my sys specs though, this pc too poo
Posted on Reply
#30
Sasqui
pantherx12How in the hell are AMD ( or anyone else) going to be able to compete with this?

lol
By adding back in 800 million transistors :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#31
Grings
This is why ARM wont be competing with intel anytime soon, i mean, imagine what they would do if they actually had competition...
Posted on Reply
#32
Casecutter
Wow they are "PLAYing" with 14Nm in a laboratory-environment... have the path to actually go and produce 14nm products!

OMG I'd expect so... this is constituting News'. :wtf:

This doesn't indicate they've anything that comprises something more than a rudimentary I/O circuit, and then probably nothing more than a proof of concept employing 3D metal gates at that level. Everyone is speculating that by 2014-2015 they'll have working chips… Ah, I’d hope so! Moore's Law@2years or David House "18 months" it's due to repeat we know that!

But, like others say will/should that really be the right direction in 2-3 years? Well that’s the direction Intel wants you to believe and follow. Kind Orwellian-1984 to me, they know what you want? This feels so lock-step with x86… :respect:

Is APU/GPU computing, ARM etc... the revolution?
Posted on Reply
#33
HumanSmoke
tiggerAmd need a ufo packed with nice shiz to crash into their main office.
At which point AMD will take the fluffy dice from the UFO's rear-vision mirror and reverse engineer them for 32nm...

...Next they'll sell the rest of the UFO for scrap *cough*Xilleon and mobile*cough* to fund another $250k relocation allowance for Rory Read in order to move to Roswell to oversee the fluffy dice product ramp :eek:
Posted on Reply
#34
Delta6326
Sniff, sniff do you smell that? Smells like Intel is cooking up a monopoly.:banghead:
Posted on Reply
#35
Easy Rhino
Linux Advocate
you guys who are worried about an intel monopoly are literally arguing against yourselves.

intel pretty much has a monopoly. they control the entire industry YET they continue to push out insane chips with even greater degrees of innovation at reasonable prices.
Posted on Reply
#36
xenocide
Intel has continually innovated and offered competatively and fairly priced products for the better half of the last decade, and people still treat them like nothing but a terrible anti-competative monopoly. Intel continues to push out new and innovative products, and all people do is bitch. They have had a monopoly since the 90's, and when AMD had a few years to catch up when Netburst was flopping, they did very little to capitalize.
Posted on Reply
#37
Delta6326
Don't get me wrong I'm not complaining I like Intel. I don't even think their prices are high, I just don't like to see the law broken monopoly aren't allowed where I live.
Posted on Reply
#38
Easy Rhino
Linux Advocate
Delta6326Don't get me wrong I'm not complaining I like Intel. I don't even think their prices are high, I just don't like to see the law broken monopoly aren't allowed where I live.
monopolies are not allowed in the U.S. either. it all comes down to HOW a company achieves their business success. do they do it with back alley deals with other companies forcing out smaller competitors and working with corrupt politicians to have laws passed in their favor or do they do it by consistently making the best products. while intel's history is not white as snow, i think we can all vouch for their incredible innovations.
Posted on Reply
#39
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
Easy Rhinomonopolies are not allowed in the U.S. either. it all comes down to HOW a company achieves their business success. do they do it with back alley deals with other companies forcing out smaller competitors and working with corrupt politicians to have laws passed in their favor or do they do it by consistently making the best products. while intel's history is not white as snow, i think we can all vouch for their incredible innovations.
Totally, they're kings for good reasons. And the prices are still pretty nice when looking at what performance you get.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Feb 16th, 2025 12:50 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts