Tuesday, March 10th 2015
First Alleged GTX TITAN-X Benchmarks Surface
Here are some of the first purported benchmarks of NVIDIA's upcoming flagship graphics card, the GeForce GTX TITAN-X. Someone with access the four of these cards installed them on a system driven by a Core i7-5960X eight-core processor, and compared its single-GPU and 4-way SLI performance on 3DMark 11, with its "extreme" (X) preset. The card scored X7994 points going solo - comparable to Radeon R9 290X 2-way CrossFire, and a single GeForce GTX TITAN-Z. With four of these cards in play, you get X24064 points. Sadly, there's nothing you can compare that score with.
NVIDIA unveiled the GeForce GTX TITAN-X at the Game Developers Conference (GDC) 2015. It was just that - an unveiling, with no specs, performance numbers, or launch date announced. The card is rumored to be based on the GM200 silicon - NVIDIA's largest based on the "Maxwell" architecture - featuring 3072 CUDA cores, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and a 384-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 12 GB of memory. The benchmark screenshots reveal core clock speeds to be around 1.00 GHz, and the memory clock at 7.00 GHz.
Source:
VideoCardz
NVIDIA unveiled the GeForce GTX TITAN-X at the Game Developers Conference (GDC) 2015. It was just that - an unveiling, with no specs, performance numbers, or launch date announced. The card is rumored to be based on the GM200 silicon - NVIDIA's largest based on the "Maxwell" architecture - featuring 3072 CUDA cores, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and a 384-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 12 GB of memory. The benchmark screenshots reveal core clock speeds to be around 1.00 GHz, and the memory clock at 7.00 GHz.
92 Comments on First Alleged GTX TITAN-X Benchmarks Surface
Anyway, score for 4-way is heavily CPU bound as 980Ti x4 on water can score upwards of 26K
single card result is ok ish.
Physics score is certainly not X99 so hard to tell properly or at least clock speed is low.
980 at 1.65GHz can match this score. If this is Windows8.1 then understandable as that is slower in this benchmark than Windows7
From the specs had expected about 8.5K or a little more from the card. but only time will tell.
R9 390X will never cost so much.
Maybe you have some insider info that you can share.
So max boost clock in Mhz ~ cost in dollars?
I hope Techpowerup does a really indepth review of this card, just in case nVidia is lying about specs and ram size again.I think Nvidia is going to be asking for 1300, based on leaks.
I just follow all news headlines which point exactly to what I am saying.
It's the same thing as cars like the Ford GT or Nissan GT-R, can sit there and complain all day long about the price but the fact is, if you are complaining about the price of it you probably can't afford it even without the markup, so why complain or even care about the price? The point is it's a halo product designed to draw attention to the series and get high end buyers to come to the product line and pump money into it. Both Intel and Nvidia do this to AMD on CPU and GPU side, and I'm sure AMD is trying to figure out how it can do this as well.
If it depends on me, they will never get out of there. ;)
2. If you did not know phones could have genders, then why refer to Sony Xperia S as a "he" instead of an "it"?
No I didn't miss the news, I'm referring to the "If it depends on me, they will never get out of there. ;)"
Seems like someone really doesn't like Nvidia - they are dreaming of ruining the company
I was making a joke about the username, and i refer to a "he" because i live in a country that doesn't have genders in it's spoken language so I guess the habit of referring to everything as a "he" has just rubbed off. I'm sorry if I offended anyone by saying "he" - i will just call everyone "it" from now on.
Double precision for gameplaer has no meaning just crazy will charge this excess RAM 12 GB. Typically, seen and an undesirable.:mad: Because those who would need it can afford quadro series. Even output are again captured 2 slot. It is difficult to make disconnecting D-VGA output and with , to get 1 slot back ! is definitely too expensive (stupid developers:banghead:) certainly are not find out of the new 1.2 outputs,. R9-295X outputs must be at least that could be learned from competition,. . 28nm GM-200 To expensive. (wtf 28nm)videocardz.com/amd/radeon-rx-300/radeon-r9-390x
AMD Announces Ultra-Enthusiast's Radeon R9 295X2 GPU $1500
AMD Officially Confirms New Radeon Flagship – R9 390X Ultra-Enthusiast Graphics Card ~$700-$800 This is way above for AMD user. lololo