Crap DaddyGiven that Apple sells watches which appear to be smart and will be obsolete next year for 10.000

HumanSmokeAh, you want me to tell you whether fake 390X scores are higher than fake Titan X scores, well it's my opinion that they could be either a fake percentage higher or lower.
As for actual performance, I made my observations known based on architecture scaling for the Titan X. As for the 390X, who knows?.

arbiterWe will see pretty soon Titan X's performance as its gotten in the hands of reviews in last day or so. So independent benchmarks and power draw will be showing up in next few days or so. Pcper podcast which was recorded about 5 hours ago as i post this had the box on their desk and had the card in their office. The real test will be 4k as the amount of ram titan X has is what it will be best area.

HumanSmokeyou're sad

HumanSmoke... and have a basic inability to formulate a coherent argument - guess that is predictable as well.

HumanSmokeyou want me to tell you whether fake 390X scores are higher than fake Titan X scores, well it's my opinion that they could be either a fake percentage higher or lower.

HumanSmokeAs for actual performance, I made my observations known based on architecture scaling for the Titan X. As for the 390X, who knows?.

Tatty_OneCan we cease the 2 or 3 man theatre show now, enough of the hijacking (again), if I have to come in this thread again because of multiple retarded posts I will just have to take the easy option and remove some of you..... thank you!

fullinfusionWow one card is smokin!

my 290X and 290 non X on the same run only score X8637 at stock clocks on a quad core cpu..

Nice to see a huge jump in scores from the green camp but fingers crossed the AMD 3 series do as well if not better.

64KThe 390/390x will be a huge jump too. These are good times for PC gamers. Lightning fast GPUs from both sides. We are well on our way to a single GPU solution to very high/ultra settings on 4K (no AA) 60+ FPS in most games. ~3 years imo. Then the enthusiasts will want 8K. :)

64KThe 390/390x will be a huge jump too. These are good times for PC gamers. Lightning fast GPUs from both sides. We are well on our way to a single GPU solution to very high/ultra settings on 4K (no AA) 60+ FPS in most games. ~3 years imo. Then the enthusiasts will want 8K. :)

raschmidtI can never figure out all the complaints from people about the price of these cards. Obviously Nvidia knows what its doing, that's why it has twice the market share that AMD does. The high price of cards like these benefits even those who aren't buying this card. It adds money for Nvidia to reinvest on a better performing next architecture, which means for those of us buying the GTX 760/960 or 770/970s, we'll probably see some of the technology passed down.
It's the same thing as cars like the Ford GT or Nissan GT-R, can sit there and complain all day long about the price but the fact is, if you are complaining about the price of it you probably can't afford it even without the markup, so why complain or even care about the price? The point is it's a halo product designed to draw attention to the series and get high end buyers to come to the product line and pump money into it. Both Intel and Nvidia do this to AMD on CPU and GPU side, and I'm sure AMD is trying to figure out how it can do this as well.

BiggieShadyInside this case from gdc2015 there is a radeon R9 390X, but AMD didn't want to show it ... case doesn't look well ventilated based on where it's positioned so it seems stock coolers are better this time round.

image courtesy pcper

Caring1I heard they hid the latest release Corvette in there that is due to appear at the upcoming motor show too :p

arbiterother thing to consider is the demo they were running on it, you don't know how much load was even on the gpu to start with so.