Tuesday, March 10th 2015
First Alleged GTX TITAN-X Benchmarks Surface
Here are some of the first purported benchmarks of NVIDIA's upcoming flagship graphics card, the GeForce GTX TITAN-X. Someone with access the four of these cards installed them on a system driven by a Core i7-5960X eight-core processor, and compared its single-GPU and 4-way SLI performance on 3DMark 11, with its "extreme" (X) preset. The card scored X7994 points going solo - comparable to Radeon R9 290X 2-way CrossFire, and a single GeForce GTX TITAN-Z. With four of these cards in play, you get X24064 points. Sadly, there's nothing you can compare that score with.
NVIDIA unveiled the GeForce GTX TITAN-X at the Game Developers Conference (GDC) 2015. It was just that - an unveiling, with no specs, performance numbers, or launch date announced. The card is rumored to be based on the GM200 silicon - NVIDIA's largest based on the "Maxwell" architecture - featuring 3072 CUDA cores, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and a 384-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 12 GB of memory. The benchmark screenshots reveal core clock speeds to be around 1.00 GHz, and the memory clock at 7.00 GHz.
Source:
VideoCardz
NVIDIA unveiled the GeForce GTX TITAN-X at the Game Developers Conference (GDC) 2015. It was just that - an unveiling, with no specs, performance numbers, or launch date announced. The card is rumored to be based on the GM200 silicon - NVIDIA's largest based on the "Maxwell" architecture - featuring 3072 CUDA cores, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and a 384-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 12 GB of memory. The benchmark screenshots reveal core clock speeds to be around 1.00 GHz, and the memory clock at 7.00 GHz.
92 Comments on First Alleged GTX TITAN-X Benchmarks Surface
At max OC 1220mhz it scored 8600 gpu score, so AMD will do better..
Imho this TitanX is a ripoff if its gonna cost more then 700$ since its missing proper FP64 like by GK110 Titans, that extra vram buffer is not worth extra money.
Fact is, GTX 980 is outperforming the aging 290X quite happily. Because of that, Nvidia has no reason to release a cheap Titan X. If you want a current gen great fast card, buy a GTX 980. I don't think Titan X will come in at any reasonable price point because it has no need too. It can be released and when the 390X comes out, Nvidia can dump prices as much as it wants too.
Nvidia can seriously hamper 390X sales by just cutting price on 980 inventories and move Titan X to the 390X price point. It's unlikely 390X will be cheap - it's pioneering a new technology - it can't afford to be cheap. AMD aren't here to be nice to consumers, they're here to make a profit for the shareholders, something they've been a bit poor at recently.
If 390X is as good as people hope, it'll come in expensive. This is business, not charity.
Please, remember the 7970 launch price was £450 - £600 (which allowed Nvidia to cruise it along on the 680).
I get it, some people really, really, want to run 4k max settings right now, and perhaps a multiple of this will do it just fine. The rest of us will wait for more reasonable 14nm/16nm parts with 8GB of ram and (likely) typical high-end card (R390/980ti-like?) prices.
That said, I really don't think any conclusions can be drawn on practicality until we know how '980ti' and 390x clock, as well as how the mem bandwidth vs larger buffer effect general performance at higher resolutions. That's pretty much completely unknown. Sure, this might be able to (barely) sustain 60fps/1440p max settings in most games stock, but can the cheaper alternatives do it overclocked? Which (R390x/980ti) will fare better? My gut says it's possible and probably '980ti (which I think will be slightly more expensive)', rendering this (for many people) moot because the tangible performance difference at playable settings will be negligible...but who knows.
*Note about 3dmark scores: They very much are swayed by amd's stronger compute performance. While that well and truly is a practical advantage in some cases, it is fundamentally generally unbalanced to core architecture efficiency. 3072 (+768sfus) at similar clocks should often perform just as well, if not better in a similar power envelope (not accounting for memory type and amount) offset to a higher clock if AMD stuck to 64 ROPs. This is one of those reasons I wish AMD would do something radical like 22CUs/24ROPs (scaled) on 14/16nm. While they'd lose the compute advantage, it would surely be efficient (generally), while perhaps better meshing with generally power-efficient clock potential of the processes within the set tdp parameters.
Titan X will never be around 500$ as 390X will most likely be.
It is only you to be bullied by nvidia who don't wanna give you top performance as soon as possible.
Early 390X has proven to be faked, but 2nd leak with X8192 was legit.
And not that I need to justify anything to you, I would happily buy AMD. So the ultra defensive posturing from you is completely unnecessary.
If it's priced as rumoured though it'll be a hard sell when Titan Z's came down to £1000 (from £2500).
Side note: GTX 780Ti also dropped in price beforce GTX 980 was launched...
on the one page linked, only 4gb ram for the card? yea 4k people will want to go with titan Z even at higher price cause 12gb ram for gaming buffer.
It is like a scene in a hardware store in Akihabara a few days ago.
Man: 「Damn! This is very expensive! Such a greedy person!」
Clerk: 「Sir, we have already told you, this is a high end hardware. It is not made for commoners.」
Man: 「But why is it very expensive!? It is just a quad-core processor!! This octa-core processor is going to be released and it is going to be much cheaper and better.」
Clerk: 「Sir, can I ask you a few questions?」
Man: 「Yes.」
Clerk: 「Are you waiting for that octa-core processor you mention?」
Man: 「Yes.」
Clerk: 「Are you going to buy it?」
Man: 「Definitely!! It is going to be a faster processor than this one! I am longing for one!」
Clerk: 「Do you want to buy this processor we are selling right now?」
Man: 「No! Definitely not!」
Clerk: 「Honestly, do you have enough money to buy this processor?」
Man: 「Eee, no... Even if I had, I still do not think it is a good purchase.」
Clerk: 「Then why are you still here? Please step aside, Sir. You are blocking our line of customers. Please come again if you have enough money and decide to buy something from us.」
Two 780ti classified's under water need far better (even than 980's) to move me to upgrade. I'll hopefully sit it out until June and see how the 390X fares. I'll certainly not buy a Titan X unless it's unexpectedly cheap (0.00001% chance of that).
Though if the Witcher Wild Hunt needs >4Gb memory...... what to do!!
That said, calling it a titan without the DP is disingenuous... this is a 980Ti ...
Unless it actually does have the DP capabilities. We don't have enough details at this point.
Honestly, if people don't like the way Nvidia runs its business, then they should just ignore it and move on with their life. I don't care for the way Apple runs its business but as far as I'm concerned, it's their own customers that get screwed and I'm more than happy with that. Are people who buy the Titan X getting screwed? Maybe.........but if they have the money to afford it they probably don't care, in which case they aren't really getting screwed. I guess the laws of Supply and Demand don't ring a bell with people.....
What I mean is that if there is demand for Kepler Titans but because of profits interest or some political, nvidia hides the inventory (or not produce enough), then they actually 'violate' these "laws".
But you have to admit. After a hard day at work, discussions of these kinds make for cheap entertainment.