Monday, October 8th 2018

Intel Officially Launches 9th Generation Processors Including the 8-Core / 16-Thread Core i9-9900K

Anand Srivatsa, Vice President of Intel, officially announced their all-new 9th generation of core processors in today's live stream. While the Coffee Lake refresh has certainly been no secret, a few facts were confirmed today. The Core i9-9900k will be Intel's first broad volume 5 GHz processor and is their first mainstream 8 core, 16 thread offering. In order to facilitate better overclocking results for enthusiasts, the company also confirmed that they will use solder TIM for the whole range of products, which should result in not only better overclocking potential but much lower thermals as well.
In a performance demonstration on stage, Intel showed a Core i9-9900K equipped system running two virtual machines with two games running, both streaming, at the same time. The demonstration showed not only that there was enough CPU performance to run multiple games, but it also had enough grunt left over to stream them both at the same time. While not a realistic workload by any means, it does demonstrate the multi-threading capabilities of the processor to some degree. While further data was not revealed, in Intel's own words, having tested 19 of today's games the Core i9-9900K came out on top of anything else, including AMD. This is not surprising considering the 5 GHz boost clock it ships with. However, reviews will be needed to confirm just how big a performance bump actually exists.

In regards to actual specifications, what we do know is the Core i9-9900K will be an 8-core, 16-thread processor with a base clock of 3.6 GHz and a boost clock of 5.0 GHz. The Core i7-9700K which will likely be the sweet spot for most gamers features eight cores, eight threads, due to Hyper-Threading having been disabled. Clock speeds are similar with the base clock being the same as the Core i9-9900K and the boost clock topping out at 4.9 GHz.
Finally the Intel Core i5-9600K comes in with six cores, six threads with hyper threading also disabled. The base clock sees a small jump here to 3.7 GHz while the boost clock tops out at a far more modest 4.6 GHz. All three have the same 256 KB of L2 cache per core, however, the L3 cache sizes vary between them. The Core i9-9900K will have 16 MB of L3 available, while the Core i7-9700K drops to 12 MB and last and with the least comes the Core i5-9600K with just 9 MB. All three processors feature the same 95 W TDP and 16 PCIe lanes. When it comes to the Integrated Graphics, Intel has stuck with the same GT2 configuration as seen on their previous 8th generation processors.
While Z390 boards are launching as well, Intel's Coffee Lake refresh will be supported on the older Z370 chipset. Making the latest generation a drop in upgrade, however, a BIOS update will be necessary. Those interested in purchasing a 9th generation processor wont need to wait long, as Intel also stated that pre-orders are now available with the 9th generation core processor family being made available globally on October 19th.

Update Oct 8, 22:00 UTC:
Intel has released more information as to the performance uplift enthusiasts can expect from the Core i9-9900k. They have also specified a bit more information as to the latest platforms maximum supported PCIE lanes and pricing.
  • Enabling more than 220 FPS on three of the most popular global PC game titles. (up to; 309 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege, 224 FPS in Fortnite, 440 FPS in CSGO and 221 FPS in PUBG.)
  • With Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0 delivering up to 5.0 GHz single-core frequency, gamers can enjoy their favorite games with up to 10 percent more FPS across popular gaming titles compared with the previous generation, as well as up to 37 percent more FPS compared to a 3-year-old PC.
  • Capture game play, transcode and stream while playing. With this type of megatasking, gamers can enjoy up to 11 percent more FPS compared with the previous generation and up to 41 percent more FPS compared with a 3-year-old PC.
  • Video editing improved on Adobe Premiere- Up to 34 percent faster video editing compared with the previous generation and up to 97 percent faster compared with a 3-year-old PC.
  • Overall system performance improved up to 15 percent better as compared with previous generation and up to 40 percent as compared with a 3-year-old PC.
  • Overclock these new processors with the Intel Extreme Tuning Utility (Intel XTU), a precision tool for advanced overclocking, and take advantage of the additional thermal headroom with solder thermal interface material (STIM).
Update Oct 9, 11:00 UTC:
We took a closer look at the performance results published by Intel (testing conducted by an external company), and noticed that many things don't add up regarding how the AMD test systems were set up, which in our opinion led to a significant performance disadvantage for the AMD rigs. More details here: www.techpowerup.com/248355/intels-9th-gen-core-gaming-benchmarks-flawed-and-misleading

Update Oct 19:
Our review of the Core i9-9900K is live now.
Add your own comment

114 Comments on Intel Officially Launches 9th Generation Processors Including the 8-Core / 16-Thread Core i9-9900K

#101
fabtech
kingsThe 9900K will stomp everything in the mainstream, many cores/threads and excellent clocks. The problem is that it will reach in EU 600€ or close to that.

It will not be easy to recommend when a 2700X costs basically half and although it´s not the best CPU in absolute performance, it offers more than enough performance for most people.

I think the i9 will end up being a niche CPU, the sales champion should be the 9700K, now also with 8 cores (but lacking HT). I'm curious to see how it will behave compared to the 6C/12T of the 8700K.
In Europe, all retailers sell it at 700€ !!! just overpriced. This CPU is not worth its price. Already for less than 550€ price you get a R7 2700+MB+DDR4 16GB...
9900K+MB Z390 = R7 2700+MB B450+DDR4 16GB+GTX1070Ti...


*Prices are in Euros.
Posted on Reply
#102
chaotic_uk
so this is on 14 nm ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ? :roll:
Posted on Reply
#103
GoldenX
fabtechIn Europe, all retailers sell it at 700€ !!! just overpriced. This CPU is not worth its price. Already for less than 550€ price you get a R7 2700+MB+DDR4 16GB...
9900K+MB Z390 = R7 2700+MB B450+DDR4 16GB+GTX1070Ti...


*Prices are in Euros.
And that's not even like here on Argentina. There are only two processors you can buy that are not overpriced, the G4560 and the R3 1200, even the A8 9600 and R3 2200G are overpriced here. Don't even ask about an i5 8400.
Posted on Reply
#104
Melvis
notbAnd again. You claim that owning a part is what makes you know it. You've used this argument before.
You don't know me. You don't know much about the experience I have with high-end PCs, HPC and stuff. Be careful in your assumptions. :)
I havent used that argument before, stop making up stories to suit your self and well if I actually own or have used said hardware then it puts me clearly ahead of you and your so call said knowledge thats for sure!.

Your right I dont know you but I know enough that tells me that you clearly have no real idea of high end hardware thats for sure.

On a side note, I just spotted the 9900K and lesser CPU's from this new lineup from intel for sale here in Australia for $859 for the 9900K, more then double the price in which I paid for my 2700x, eeeek!
Posted on Reply
#105
notb
MelvisI havent used that argument before, stop making up stories to suit your self and well if I actually own or have used said hardware then it puts me clearly ahead of you and your so call said knowledge thats for sure!.
Having owned or used a hardware gives you knowledge about what in particular?
There are many aspects of knowing a CPU. You might know how to install it, how to use it efficiently, how it works (on many abstraction levels)...

I own a carrot. The fact of owning it doesn't really give me any knowledge. I already know how it tastes from a restaurant. I know how to cook it from a cookbook. And I know how it works (at some level at least) from a biology course.
Owning a carrot only means one of 2 things:
1) I could afford it and, based on my knowledge, I decided that buying it is a good, rational choice (and economist would say: it increases my utility => classical economics),
2) I could afford it and I bought it because of some irrational factors - like because everyone else has a powerful CPU and I thought I need it too (=> behavioural economics).
Your right I dont know you but I know enough that tells me that you clearly have no real idea of high end hardware thats for sure.
What's "high-end hardware"? An i9? That's high-end consumer hardware, at most.
What kind of knowledge do I lack? I know how to install it. I know how to run programs on it. And I know some other things as well, which aren't that relevant for gaming.
What more do you know about an i9?

If a person A knows more about cooking than person B, it's likely he'll make a healthier or tastier food out of the same ingredients.
Do you think that if we had and identical PC setup, your knowledge (whatever it is) would let you get better performance?
Posted on Reply
#106
95Viper
Please stay on topic. No retaliatory comments or insulting others.
If you wish to discuss who knows what... or, cooking, take to PMs.
Posted on Reply
#107
progste
For the price of one of these you could get a 12 core threadripper.
Posted on Reply
#108
fabtech
progsteFor the price of one of these you could get a 12 core threadripper.
In europe the 9900K is 700€, the Threadripper 1920x is 480€...

Intel still thinks he is alone...
Posted on Reply
#109
RichF
EatingDirtSo you'd be okay with AMD coming out with results of a 2700x with 3466 tweaked timed ram against a 9900k with the slowest bone stock 2133 RAM? You think this is how every CPU should be reviewed? The worst case against the best case? Do you understand how absurd that is?
Considering the price difference between the two chips it could make good sense, although not with the 2133 extreme (since 2400 speed RAM can be found for the same price). The extra cost of the RAM (Samsung B side, such as 3200 14) would help to offset the difference in price between the chips. It's probably more than fair to Intel to compare a 2700X running 3200 14 with an Intel running 2666. The Ryzen may be still cheaper, even with the better RAM.

Furthermore, it's common knowledge that Ryzen's fabric benefits from the speed of RAM, making RAM speed more important for Ryzen than for Intel. Zen didn't debut yesterday. Anyone who knows anything about enthusiast-level tech knows that Ryzen requires 3200 speed RAM at minimum, preferably with tight enough timings.

When reviewers pair Ryzen with slow RAM and do brain-damaged things like apply a game mode designed for TR to an 8 core Ryzen (hobbling it to be a quad core), it's a red flag to anyone who knows anything about the platform. Professionals have to be held to a higher standard than casual readers, casual readers who know better than to do such things. Joel Hruska had the 1800X with 3200 speed RAM on day one of Zen's release. He did the testing properly, unlike Anandtech and such, which gimped Ryzen with slow RAM. This latest Intel-paid testing is even more absurd, with the way it was "accidentally" set to cut the number of active Ryzen cores in half on an 8 core, not a TR.
Posted on Reply
#110
B-Real
Haha. GLHF. Just check US, German, UK Amazon CPU top20 CPU-s. I hope Intel gets a substantional blow. Saying this with a 4570 Haswell.
Posted on Reply
#111
las
progsteFor the price of one of these you could get a 12 core threadripper.
Why on earth would I want that... Haha

I use my homerig for high fps gaming, in combination with a 1440p/165 Hz monitor, there's no way in hell I'd want a threadripper or ryzen for this. Even 8600K would be better.
Posted on Reply
#112
svan71
Please fix the title it should say PAPER LAUNCHED yet again.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 26th, 2024 22:27 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts