cucker tarlsonbit too shiny and fake to me

londisteDepends. It is unclear if there is any machine learning-ish taking place during rendering. Most of that work is supposed to happen in Nvidia's render farm and data from that delivered either via game or driver updates. I have seen a few suspicions - but no details or analysis - that something might take place locally but that does not necessarily mean delayed frames but more likely comparisons with previous (few) frames.

hutt132I think you have the labeling wrong on the comparison screenshots.

moproblems99Sounds familiar...like I saw it in Screen shots of a Battlefield game or something....what was that feature called...

cucker tarlsonlol any reflections in any pc game are designed to look that way.I absolutely adore how amd fanbase still compalins how those look reflections too shiny,as if they didn't know it's still a computer game,we are deceades from photorealism.
said that before,grapes are getting even more sour with amd leaving rt features out for nvidia to claim for themselves.

moproblems99Wait, didn't you just say the same thing about TressFX? Pot, meet kettle.

cucker tarlsonbut you said you stick with amd for implementing new image quality improvements. therefore I'm asking you cause I can't think of any in the recent few years.

cucker tarlsonwhat did I say about tress fx ?
the fact it's shiny ? yes,it is,which stands out when its applied to hair.

moproblems99What did I say about RTX? The exact same thing. Reflective surfaces are way to shiny and look fake. How do our comments differ? Enlighten me.

ratirtread again.

ratirtI stick with AMD and open techniques for improving image quality and implement new stuff.

cucker tarlsonwhat new stuff is amd implementing ?

ratirtAsk AMD not me.

cucker tarlsoncause you were compalining how reflections are shiny ?






okay.you go



I ask


you go

cucker tarlsoncause you were compalining how reflections are shiny ?

moproblems99Sounds familiar...like I saw it in Screen shots of a Battlefield game or something....what was that feature called...

ratirtat first I'd say that blurry picture is nothing innovative if you speak about DLSS. Besides too much sharpness or too much blurriness is not good either way. DLSS brings nothing new except the FPS is higher? (correct me if I'm wrong) If that's the case then it's because the image quality is down and that's how I see it from the TPU review of the DLSS.
To summarize. Nvidia didn't invent anything new with DLSS as you perceive it. Blurriness for me have been with us a long time. Calling something DLSS and telling people this is a new technology isn't ok. Maybe it brings something new to the table but, I hope, this is yet to be seen. NV's focus, as we all know, is on money so this DLSS is more of a marketing than actual innovation for me (innovation with poor image quality). Especially when they come up with some new tech ditching all other 1-2 years old innovation bringing something new to the table to charge more for it.
I stick with AMD and open techniques for improving image quality and implement new stuff. This is just another way for NV (that's just my opinion) to give "something new that only they have" (but in fact it's been in the market already developed) to charge more and convince customers and game developers that's they way to go and of course charge more.
Just like it is with G-Sync and just like it will be with G-sync compatible ( which in fact is free sync). that's just lame. :)

moproblems99Sorry but can you show me where I said the reflections were too shiny? Let me quote myself below.

Edit: I'll cut you a break because I didn't explicitly say reflective surfaces. However, I figured someone with your intellect would have put it together.

cucker tarlsonBF5 has raytraced reflections only.

moproblems99Right you are. But it is the reflective surfaces that look too fake and shiny. The reflections probably look great. I just can't get over the surfaces looking terrible.

cucker tarlsonprobably has to happen at this point,or it would be too subltle for anyone's eye to really catch.

FluffmeisterIt would just be nice if AMD could conclusively beat a 2 year old EOL card with 7nm tech, but the spin from their director of marketing is.... expected.

moproblems99Oh, so now we have to make the reflective surfaces overly shiny, fake, and not realistic looking so that people MIGHT actually be able to see this revolutionary tech for realism improvements.

Gotcha.

Nice Ninja.

ArbitraryAffectionI'd take it over a dumb computer program guessing what a super-sampled image should look like. Especially when you consider how much die space is taken up by those Tensor cores. Honestly, those tensors are for AI training in servers and pro cards and NVIDIA is trying to sell them to gamers so they are OK paying more for less performance because the dies are bigger.

cucker tarlsonthey've been like that before rtx to show off ssr,please just don't tell me you only now noticed.

jabbadapWell it's new way of doing AA, there haven't been AA method using machine learning before DLSS. So saying it's nothing new is a false statement. And like there is in article AMD is exploring similar WinML upscaling filters too. And the filter works as well as it could be teached. Now dlss looks like crap, maybe it could get better over time with more ML runs on super computer to get better training model for inference. But if it can't achieve that, it's just one more bad AA method out there, which will eventually die a way.

Vya DomusNo it isn't, actually. Aliasing happens when you sample different signals in such a way that they appear identical once put back together, that is the textbook definition. Here the signals represent graphical elements before they are rasterized (sampled) not the whole image as Nvidia would like to imply. The way you avoid aliasing is to apply a filter to those particular elements before they are sampled , or in this case before the image is rendered, MSAA for example works like that (well, not exactly, but the point is that this is done on a per component basis). That is also the textbook definition of how you would go about using an anti-aliasing method.

Whatever DLSS does is applied to the whole mage after it is rendered, it is an upscaling solution nothing more. That's the equivalent of interpolating a signal, not filtering it. Post process AA like FXAA isn't a true method of AA either by definition, because there you try and alter the signal after it was sampled as well not while it is constructed.

You don't, you use those cores only to make it faster.

ratirtMaybe I understand innovation a bit different here.

For me it's a way of achieving at least same resault or better in a cost efficient way (there's more but this is a good example). RTX price is huge and this innovation ain't nothing like what we already have with open techniques. It is worse.
I disagree with your statement. This is what I think about the DLSS. It's my opinion. If you say it's worth something, that's OK with me.
I also disagree that having dozen of techniques to achieve one goal is a great way. You can't focus on so called "innovations" and start from scratch every time, when you have all that's needed already there and open to everybody. Think about game developers and gamers. Do you realize what would have happend if we had these "innovations" once a year? They won't implement every single one.
So for me at this point, DLSS is a downgrade. :)

jabbadapAcronym DLSS comes from Deep Learning Super-Sampling, so by definition some sort of Super-Sampling anti-aliasing method albeit quite crappy one. But the end result is it removes aliasing which is quite what anti-aliasing is.



Well yeah if it would work like it is marketed, it could be quite game changer. Better quality than 4k with TAA at much higher framerates. I would be all over it, but in current state we don't have even close to that. So pretty big meh until proved otherwise.

moproblems99It certainly isn't dumb, just needs to be refined. If they can find out a decent algorithm then DLSS could be very useful. Much like RTX in BFV according to cucker, you likely won't notice it.

ratirtThe FPS is higher cause the image quality is down. I think it's that simple.

ArbitraryAffectionI disagree honestly, AI technology as it is right now is dumb. It's little more than basic logic engines. there is no real intelligence, and there wont be for many years. it's in its infancy but of course this is a good step and its gotta start somewhere.

moproblems99I mean look at the average human, logic is mostly gone. We are, in general, purely emotion driven