Monday, August 5th 2019

Intel Plans to Launch Its Discrete GPU Lineup Starting at $200

During interview with Russian YouTube channel called PRO Hi-Tech, Raja Koduri, Intel's chief architect and senior vice president of architecture, software and graphics, talked about his career, why he left AMD, and where Intel is going with its discrete GPU attempts. However, one of the most notable things Mr Koduri said was regarding upcoming GPU lineup code-named Arctic Sound. He noted that Intel plans to release first GPU as a mid-range model at a price of $200, while enterprise solutions that utilize HBM memory will follow that.

Koduri said that he wants to replicate AMD's strategy of capturing high-volume price-points, such as the $199 Radeon RX 480. The plan here is to bring an affordable, good performing GPU to the masses - "GPUs for everyone" as he calls them. Additionally, he states that Intel's current strategy revolves around price, not performance, providing best possible value to consumers. Intel's approach for the next two or three years is to launch a complete lineup of GPUs, with a common architecture being used for everything from iGPUs found inside consumer CPUs to data-center GPUs.

Update: PRO Hi-Tech has posted a snippet of Raja Koduri interview, without the Russian overlay commentary. What he said was actually: "...Eventually our architecture, as publicly said, has to get from mainstream, which is starting at around $100, all the way to data-center class graphics with HBM memory...". This means that the previous speculation about $200 graphics card is false, as he didn't say that. All he said is that Intel wants to enter the "mainstream" GPU market and work its way up to data center.
Source: PRO Hi-Tech
Add your own comment

77 Comments on Intel Plans to Launch Its Discrete GPU Lineup Starting at $200

#26
moproblems99
Intel's approach for the next two or three years is to launch a complete lineup of GPUs, with a common architecture being used for everything from iGPUs found inside consumer CPUs to data-center GPUs.
AHAHAHAHAHA....
Posted on Reply
#27
Jism
lasThe 512 core version could have up to 14.7 TFLOPS depending on clockspeeds. FP32. Thats more than 2080 Ti.

I don't think it will beat 2080 Ti in gaming tho... xD but Intel could have something decent up their sleeve here. The 10th gen mobile chips are not bad in the iGPU department. 3 times faster than 9th gen on average and this is with very low core count and clockspeed.

Looking forward to see the performance on these 4 dGPU's.
The Tflops means nothing basicly to gaming performance. Look at larrabee. An attempt to put x86 cores as a universal graphics processor. It failed. It got put as a accelerator of general purpose things.

But to be honest, releasing a 200$ midrange card that is able to compete with the Polaris, and not navi, is a misstep in the wrong direction. I think the power of that GPU should be within the 5700 territory and not the 480.
Posted on Reply
#28
moproblems99
JismThe Tflops means nothing basicly to gaming performance. Look at larrabee. An attempt to put x86 cores as a universal graphics processor. It failed. It got put as a accelerator of general purpose things.

But to be honest, releasing a 200$ midrange card that is able to compete with the Polaris, and not navi, is a misstep in the wrong direction. I think the power of that GPU should be within the 5700 territory and not the 480.
It was a metaphor not what they are actually targeting.
Posted on Reply
#29
cucker tarlson
moproblems99AHAHAHAHAHA....
the amd method,that worked well until it didn't.
Posted on Reply
#31
cucker tarlson
Mamya3084Just crossfire two 480s and "bam" 1080 performance.

www.techpowerup.com/231100/amds-raja-koduri-and-rx-480-multi-gpu-100-scaling-on-sniper-elite-4
it just works
JismThe Tflops means nothing basicly to gaming performance. Look at larrabee. An attempt to put x86 cores as a universal graphics processor. It failed. It got put as a accelerator of general purpose things.

But to be honest, releasing a 200$ midrange card that is able to compete with the Polaris, and not navi, is a misstep in the wrong direction. I think the power of that GPU should be within the 5700 territory and not the 480.
or just look at radeon vii vs rtx 2070. 7.5tflops almost matches 13.5tflops
Posted on Reply
#32
64K
Mamya3084I dunno, last time Raj was heading a GPU division, he gave us Vega...the Volta killer....

Better they simply say nothing until they can show us a physical product.
imo Lisa Su was holding back R&D spending on the GPU business because she was putting the money into developing Ryzen. I won't be surprised if one day Koduri comes right out and says that's why he left AMD for intel because he wanted to do more but Lisa Su wouldn't authorize it.
Posted on Reply
#33
moproblems99
cucker tarlsonthe amd method,that worked well until it didn't.
The 580 did its job but that is not what I would develop my new strategic goal around. Unless it is just to get the foot in the door.
Posted on Reply
#34
cucker tarlson
moproblems99The 580 did its job but that is not what I would develop my new strategic goal around. Unless it is just to get the foot in the door.
jack of all trades,master of none.
vega cards started at 3 cu parts and topped at 64 cu frontier edition.never got traction in any segment unless it was purely for the discounted price and game bundle reasons.
polaris was better in this respect since it was a console designated gpu.
Posted on Reply
#35
moproblems99
cucker tarlsonjack of all trades,master of none.
vega cards started at 3 cu parts and topped at 64 cu frontier edition.never got traction in any segment unless it was purely for the discounted price and game bundles.
polaris was better in this respect since it was a console designated gpu.
This will likely slam the door in the face of anyone expecting Intel and Raja to jump in the gpu game and save them any time soon.
Posted on Reply
#36
cucker tarlson
intel better get their eyes back on their cpus cause amd will put them out of business if they plan to twiddle their thumbs for another year.
Posted on Reply
#37
Steevo
More vaporware........
Posted on Reply
#38
moproblems99
cucker tarlsonintel better get their eyes back on their cpus cause amd will put them out of business if they plan to twiddle their thumbs for another year.
Intel could not lift a finger for a decade and still have more cash than And.
Posted on Reply
#39
kapone32
Regardless of how some of us will feel this will be nothing but good for the consumer. Nvidia is the undisputed king as the length of the 1080Ti shows. AMD is rising or Ryzen (hehe) with Polaris and now Navi. Intel has enough money and has gleaned enough talent from the pool to in my opinion make a GPU that should be able to compete with at least the 580 or 1660ti. Having 3 competitors in a space reserved for the most expensive component in a PC build is nothing but good. I would say that in about 3 years we will all be glad it happened.
Posted on Reply
#40
64K
kapone32Regardless of how some of us will feel this will be nothing but good for the consumer. Nvidia is the undisputed king as the length of the 1080Ti shows. AMD is rising or Ryzen (hehe) with Polaris and now Navi. Intel has enough money and has gleaned enough talent from the pool to in my opinion make a GPU that should be able to compete with at least the 580 or 1660ti. Having 3 competitors in a space reserved for the most expensive component in a PC build is nothing but good. I would say that in about 3 years we will all be glad it happened.
That's my feeling as well. I don't see any downside to Intel entering the discrete GPU market. Even if they totally fail we still haven't lost anything that we already have right now (Nvidia and AMD) but there is a potential upside for consumers if Intel succeeds in bringing a good lineup of GPUs.
Posted on Reply
#41
EarthDog
cucker tarlsonintel better get their eyes back on their cpus cause amd will put them out of business if they plan to twiddle their thumbs for another year.
LOL, no.. no they won't.

Anyway, back to reality (oh there goes rabbit...), any additional competition is good. I like the price point, but where will it perform is the big question. Are they taking the value proposition like AMD and more so competing with them in that ring only? I would love to see a high-end discrete offering from Intel.
kapone32Nvidia is the undisputed king as the length of the 1080Ti shows.
You sure it's not girth? :roll:
Posted on Reply
#42
XiGMAKiD
Good price point, now they just need to prove its performance
Posted on Reply
#43
kapone32
You sure it's not girth? :roll:
[/QUOTe

:D
Posted on Reply
#44
EarthDog
kapone32You sure it's not girth? :roll:
[/QUOTe

:D
I'm nicknaming you the quote borker... :D
Posted on Reply
#45
kapone32
EarthDogI'm nicknaming you the quote borker... :D
Nothing wrong with a new nickname or tag Thanks :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#46
dicktracy
Let’s be real. Nvidia’s next 7nm GPU will make big Navi and whatever Intel has to offer a midrange to lowend GPU solution...
Posted on Reply
#47
Xaled
dicktracyLet’s be real. Nvidia’s next 7nm GPU will make big Navi and whatever Intel has to offer a midrange to lowend GPU solution...
Let's be real and not make certain statements about the future. Many things may happen, for example Nvidia may suffer what intel is suffering right now.
Posted on Reply
#48
laszlo
knowing intel cpu pricing somehow i doubt their gpu will be priced according to performance...
Posted on Reply
#49
systemBuilder
This guy, Raja, almost killed ATI/AMD by foolishly going "all in" on an unproved and hyper expensive HBM2 memory in AMD'S discrete GPUs (Rx Vega 56, 64). AMD lost money on every single sale. AMD returned to using GDDR6 now in rx5700 and rx5700 xt. Rajas GPUs run hot and waste a lot of memory bandwidth. I predict he will destroy Intel ....
Posted on Reply
#50
64K
systemBuilderThis guy, Raja, almost killed ATI/AMD
He was Senior Vice President and Chief Architect of RTG at the end of his tenure with AMD. That's a position of considerable authority but do you not see that he answered to the CEO Lisa Su. He did what he was told to do by her and this is not intended as a slam on Lisa Su at all. As it turns out she was completely right to focus on the CPU business of AMD and the financials bare that out.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 08:39 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts