Thursday, August 8th 2019

AMD Designing Zen 4 for 2021, Zen 3 Completes Design Phase, out in 2020

AMD in its 2nd generation EPYC processor launch event announced that it has completed the design phase of its next-generation "Zen 3" CPU microarchitecture, and is currently working on its successor, the "Zen 4." AMD debuted its "Zen 2" microarchitecture with the client-segment 3rd generation Ryzen desktop processor family, it made its enterprise debut with the 2nd generation EPYC. This is the first x86 CPU microarchitecture designed for the 7 nanometer silicon fabrication process, and is being built on a 7 nm DUV (deep ultraviolet) node at TSMC. It brings about double-digit percentage IPC improvements over "Zen+."

The "Zen 3" microarchitecture is designed for the next big process technology change within 7 nm, EUV (extreme ultraviolet), which allows significant increases in transistor densities, and could facilitate big improvements in energy-efficiency that could be leveraged to increase clock-speeds and performance. It could also feature new ISA instruction-sets. With "Zen 3" passing design phase, AMD will work on prototyping and testing it. The first "Zen 3" products could debut in 2020. "Zen 4" is being designed for a different era.
The "Zen 4" architecture is being designed for a 2021 market debut, and will come out at a time when the 7 nm process will have matured and attained high enough volumes at TSMC for AMD to either build bigger dies (more cores per chiplet), or leverage the even more advanced 6 nm EUV node. The maturity and volumes of these sub-10 nm nodes could change the economics of the MCM approach AMD is undertaking for its EPYC processors.
Add your own comment

85 Comments on AMD Designing Zen 4 for 2021, Zen 3 Completes Design Phase, out in 2020

#26
Nordic
It doesn't seem like amd does a tick tock strategy. It seems to be a tick tick
Posted on Reply
#27
Steevo
bugSo... we get a timeline from AMD and a timeline from Intel, but AMD's is good? :D
I have been hearing a lot from Intel but have only seen the smoke and mirrors. AMD actually has product for sale.


But Intel did show off a sticker..... I guess you could show us the sticker gains, how much IPC and Thz you get with a sticker that is. 0ns latency measurements on their new chips, and their new GPU, mostly since they aren't available, but look at that number... 0ns of latency... Who would have thought it possible, certainty not the knights of Ni..... Maybe it's the measurement of how long does it take a Intel fanboi to thread crap when it's about AMDs actual new product. But it can't be that, they have to mitigate for so many security issues.....
Posted on Reply
#28
R0H1T
NordicIt seems to be a tick tick
We'll have to see if zen3 is another (major) tick like zen2 or just a minor bump, also Tick Tock officially died 5 or 6 years back with Haswell.

Not that it matters too much, but if AMD can pull another rabbit from their hat then Intel's gonna be in serious trouble even post ICL or whatever they put on 7nm.
Posted on Reply
#29
efikkan
And we're back to trench warfare again…

The launch of Zen 2 marks the beginning of at least ~3 years of exciting years ahead. Both AMD and Intel have several new architectures (or upgraded architectures) lined up, which is something we haven't seen in many years.

I do hope AMD can continue to keep up the tempo and don't slow down the improvements with Zen 3...5.
Some rumors point to 4-way SMT and application specific instructions in Zen 3, but I hope these rumors are wrong, like most of the Zen 2 rumors were.
Posted on Reply
#30
Zareek
medi01Well over them, even in AVX512 scenario, where Intel still has some edge, you get this:




People are mistaking Ryzen 3000 vs Intel with higher clock, to server chips, which run at close clock.
What a steal too, it only costs 40% more to gain a whopping 2% performance advantage! We won't even talk about the power consumption differences which really add up when you are talking about dozens or even hundreds of servers.
Posted on Reply
#31
B-Real
my_name_is_earlSo much hype. Still can't beat Intel in overall performance.
What? :D It can't beat Intel in gaming (=4-5% difference in FHD only with a 2080Ti. Who the hell uses a 2080Ti for FHD? :D With a 2080 on FHD, there's zero difference) and beats Intel in single and multi core. That's why AMD is outselling Intel 2 or 3 to 1 in Germany, Japan, in the UK or in the USA. So please stop lying. Or are you a paid Intel employee?
Posted on Reply
#32
gamefoo21
It's a little annoying that AMD is talking/boasting about Ryzen 4xxx and 5xxx in coming years but...

Still not a damn peep officially about a 58 or 5900... :-(
Posted on Reply
#33
TheGuruStud
gamefoo21It's a little annoying that AMD is talking/boasting about Ryzen 4xxx and 5xxx in coming years but...

Still not a damn peep officially about a 58 or 5900... :-(
Intel can't respond. They got rid of the Nvidia moles, so why give them any info?

Should have assassinated the moles and sent Nvidia a message.
Posted on Reply
#34
Nordic
B-RealWhat? :D It can't beat Intel in gaming (=4-5% difference in FHD only with a 2080Ti. Who the hell uses a 2080Ti for FHD? :D With a 2080 on FHD, there's zero difference) and beats Intel in single and multi core. That's why AMD is outselling Intel 2 or 3 to 1 in Germany, Japan, in the UK or in the USA. So please stop lying. Or are you a paid Intel employee?
As an owner of a 3900x I can confirm that it is not faster than intel in single threaded tasks. I seem to be getting within 5% the performance as a stock 9700k/9900k. With a little overclocking, the Intel cpu would push that gap further than 5%.

The problem is that ryzen 3000 are 4.2ghz chips, and boost doesn't really make the chip run faster except during idle loads. If ryzen 3000 actually ran at its advertised boost speed, then amd would genuinely have the faster chip.
Posted on Reply
#35
Mysteoa
trparkyThat's what I thought too. I was like... "Wait, I thought 2020 was going to have Zen 2+" similar to Intel's old tick-tock (or tock-tick) model. I guess not.

I wonder what Zen 3 will mean for us consumers? I can only hope that they can get clock speeds much higher. AMD may have beaten Intel in the IPC department; unfortunately, Intel has AMD beat in terms of clock speed which makes up for Intel's IPC deficit. AMD really needs to get clock speeds much closer to 5 GHz.
They can still decide to have Zen2+ for Desktop and Zen3 for servers
Posted on Reply
#36
Imsochobo
R0H1TWe'll have to see if zen3 is another (major) tick like zen2 or just a minor bump, also Tick Tock officially died 5 or 6 years back with Haswell.

Not that it matters too much, but if AMD can pull another rabbit from their hat then Intel's gonna be in serious trouble even post ICL or whatever they put on 7nm.
I think this is what both camps will do: l4 cache.
Think like a Hbm stack on package which will seriously increase performance.
It's easy to do its just economics that decide.
But beyond that I don't think anyone have any idea of rabbits you can pull out other than density and cores with the shrinks the next 6? Years.
Posted on Reply
#37
soupaman
I was a firm intel customer until now, just brought an amd 3900x and would not go back to intel, i think they rely too much on getting the fastest clock speed above all else. i have a corsair h150i aio cooler and cpu temps are 30 degrees at 4ghz.
Posted on Reply
#38
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
I hope Zen 5 gets DDR5 and PCI-E 5 just to really please the OCD
Posted on Reply
#39
Manoa
I hope zen 4000 get rid of the glue, I prefer a processor to access new data faster instead of it have many memory of old data
Posted on Reply
#40
Calmmo
MusselsI hope Zen 5 gets DDR5 and PCI-E 5 just to really please the OCD
pretty likely for ddr5 i'd say (Zen 4 1st implementation), but i doubt pcie5 will be mainstream ready that early.
Posted on Reply
#41
HTC
MusselsI hope Zen 5 gets DDR5 and PCI-E 5 just to really please the OCD
Zen 5? Isn't that three generations ahead of now?

We're currently with Zen 2 ...

Ofc ... doesn't help Zen 2 is Ryzen 3000 series ... adds to confusion, needlessly ...
Posted on Reply
#42
efikkan
Calmmopretty likely for ddr5 i'd say (Zen 4 1st implementation), but i doubt pcie5 will be mainstream ready that early.
PCIe 5 will require more expensive motherboards, so I assume it will remain a premium/enterprise feature for a while.
Posted on Reply
#43
CountMike
my_name_is_earlSo much hype. Still can't beat Intel in overall performance.
Ha, ha ,ha.
Posted on Reply
#44
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
HTCZen 5? Isn't that three generations ahead of now?

We're currently with Zen 2 ...

Ofc ... doesn't help Zen 2 is Ryzen 3000 series ... adds to confusion, needlessly ...
i was very clearly talking about several years in the future, and my love for number 5.
Posted on Reply
#45
TheoneandonlyMrK
Midland Dogi feel like zen + was a stopgap while waiting for 7nm duv to be ready anyway, zen 1 fealt like this; are we still in business? this wont sink us will it? and zen + fealt like; are we sure were good? confirm the kill
So they went from a Cpu design that was monolithic, but capable of being mcm combined to one that optimised(yes only optimised) that design then they split that same design out even more into chiplets while improving the chips again and dropping a node.

While in that time Intel kept pretty much the same design, added some cores and not much else.

How would you evolve a design through 3 node sizes and a dramatic / evolutionary change in layout and manufacture.

They did indeed risk A Lot and unlike intel they had a progressive plan so yes each part Was a Step towards something better.

You make it sound like a negative this Inovation.
Yet that's how chips are intelligently designed and built.
Posted on Reply
#46
medi01
gamefoo21It's a little annoying that AMD is talking/boasting about Ryzen 4xxx and 5xxx in coming years but...

Still not a damn peep officially about a 58 or 5900... :-(
Intel: 100k employees
nvda: 13k employees
AMD: 10k employees

Oh, and thank you, Sony & Microsoft, for saving AMD with semi-custom business, while customers were opting for slower and more expensive cards from its competitors.
Posted on Reply
#47
bug
medi01Intel: 100k employees
nvda: 13k employees
AMD: 10k employees
You're quoting that like it's somehow an achievement to have fewer employees. Sure, it's impressive to bring the fight to a rival that has 10x as many (which is not an accurate comparison, an accurate comparison would be how many of those employees, on both sides work on CPUs/GPUs), but that stat is more like a measurement of AMD's inability to grow to the same size.
Posted on Reply
#48
techmagnet
NordicAs an owner of a 3900x I can confirm that it is not faster than intel in single threaded tasks. I seem to be getting within 5% the performance as a stock 9700k/9900k. With a little overclocking, the Intel cpu would push that gap further than 5%.

The problem is that ryzen 3000 are 4.2ghz chips, and boost doesn't really make the chip run faster except during idle loads. If ryzen 3000 actually ran at its advertised boost speed, then amd would genuinely have the faster chip.
I also have 3900x and very happy about it even if it didn't hit the advertised single core boosts. I'm proud about Zen 2 architecture over Intel's CometLake 10nm architecture. Intel's 10nm processors cannot hit 4.0ghz on Desktop platform no wonder all of them goes to laptop.
Posted on Reply
#49
Nordic
techmagnetI also have 3900x and very happy about it even if it didn't hit the advertised single core boosts. I'm proud about Zen 2 architecture over Intel's CometLake 10nm architecture. Intel's 10nm processors cannot hit 4.0ghz on Desktop platform no wonder all of them goes to laptop.
Don't get me wrong, I am happy with my 3900x. That doesn't mean it is without criticism.
Posted on Reply
#50
Bytales
my_name_is_earlSo much hype. Still can't beat Intel in overall performance.
Idiots/morons/kretins will always exists, ist an inescapeble fact of existence, like birth and death !

To get serious and on Topic, i have only this to add.
Intel is Faqed ! And im glad it is. I hope they bankrupt to be honest. They milked us all with incremental Performances increase, and People swalled it all, because there was no alternative. They knowingly throthled Progress for the sake of Profit. All a bunch of mortal greedy fucks, the whole lot of them. I hope they bankrupt, and die a teriblle death. Financially.

In the end, it is not they fault. The bigger Culprit is the "Babylonian Money Magic Slave System".
medium.com/@writemedi/how-the-babylonian-money-magic-slave-system-works-381164653772
These are the reald fuks that need to be eradicated ! As Longs as Money exists, we will never be able to reach our true capable potential. Money will walways be in the way.
Money in itself Needs to be stoped being used.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 4th, 2024 14:59 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts