Tuesday, February 4th 2020

GIGABYTE Lists AMD B550 and Intel Z490 Motherboards

Thanks to the findings of VideoCardz, we have information that GIGABYTE has listed its upcoming motherboards for AMD and Intel platforms. Starting with AMD's upcoming mid-range chipset, the B550 model is supposed to bring PCIe 4.0 connectivity options to lower-priced motherboard variants. So far, only high-end chipset versions like X570 had PCIe 4.0 support, while the mid-range option was lacking. GIGABYTE has prepared a total of six B550 AORUS models, along with a GAMING series which is supposed to be a tier below AORUS models. The B550 chipset will span all motherboard sizes, including ATX, Micro-ATX, and Mini-ITX.

In the EEC listing, GIGABYTE also submitted Intel's upcoming Z490 motherboards for Comet Lake-S CPUs. In the listing, we see a total of 15 motherboards listed with an unusable entry. Again the W480 chipset appears, which is meant to power workstation motherboards. This chipset will go inside a new motherboard lineup called the "VISION" series. While we don't know what this new series brings, we know that both the workstation enabled W480 chipset and regular Z490 chipset will be a part of it.
Source: VideoCardz
Add your own comment

56 Comments on GIGABYTE Lists AMD B550 and Intel Z490 Motherboards

#51
TechLurker
Something novel I'd like to see on B550 motherboards (or prosumer/workstation variants) is the possibility of taking all PCIe 4.0 lanes and convert them into PCIe 3.0 lanes (effectively doubling the available lanes), allowing for 2 full x16 slots and 2 x4 NVMe 3.0 slots, or 1 x16 and 2 x8 slots and 2 x4 NVMe 3.0 slots. Basically adding more slot expansion capability allowing for things like a GPU + SATA/SAS Raid card + 10GbE card + 2 NVMe PCIe 3.0 SSDs. Moreso since there are plenty of PCIe 3.0 cards available that would work fine on 3.0.

Beyond that, the only thing B550 is likely to bring is innate 1 x16 4.0 and 1 x4 4.0 slots for the first NVMe drive and the first slot (for GPUs), but will probably default to 3.0 for any remaining slots. It's going to be weird considering that it's basically a half-step up from X470 motherboards, going from PCIe 3.0 to 4.0 on the 1st NVMe and GPU slot and PCIe 2.0 to 3.0 on the remaining slots. The only things that benefit from 4.0 currently are NVMe SSDs and 4x NVMe cards, and the oddball 5500/5500XT 4GB due to the lack of VRAM.
Posted on Reply
#52
Tigerfox
I would, too, if the chipset itself was more than Gen3, but if the entire board was Gen3, there would be to little difference to X470.

Also APUs don't really matter that much in this market, they are mainly sold in Laptops or really low-end office-PC. Noone in their right mind would chose an APU for gaming. BTW Renoir APUs will be the same for all applications, just with different TDP and clocks.

EDIT: @TechLurker: Yeah, just your wish is impossible, one lane will always be one lane, regardless of Gen. The only way for this is to use a PCIe-Switch-Controller, like the ones from PLX, which aren't really use anymore since PLX was bought by broadcom. They were used on a few occasions for a similiar job, just the other way round: Connecting multiple PCIe2.0x1 or x2 devices to one PCIe1.1x4 (Asus P55), Switching between many PCIe2.0x1 or x2-devices (using more than 4 Lanes total, like 6-8 lanes) connected to one x4-Port on many S1155-Boards because of to few Lanes on PCH, or connecting 2-4 Gen2/Gen3-GPU via 2x16 or 4x8 on an CPU with only one x16 (many very highend S1155/S1150-Boards, every Dual-GPU-Card).
Posted on Reply
#53
Tsukiyomi91
if the B550 ever becomes a disappointment for me, then getting the X570 & discounted Ryzen 7 3700X would be my last resort pick as I'm still holding out.
Posted on Reply
#54
gamefoo21
I think APUs represent a massive portion of the market.

They directly go against the Intel iGPU equipped office boxes.

Those Corporate sales are monstrous compared to the enthusiast market.
Posted on Reply
#55
Dammeron
TheinsanegamerNIt really is sad that AMD mATX gets ignored. Look at z390 mATX boards, they may not be great, but they do get 4 phase VRMs with proper doublers that can handle the power draw of a OCed 9700k.

Thats all we want. A 4 phase doubler that can handle OCed 3950x CPUs. It sbeen dont in the past, we used to get full proper 8 phase VRMs on mATX boards, but for some reason the wholemATX community is withering, the good VRMs are either on mITX boards or full ATX boards. When a mITX board has better VRMs then the same brand's mATX boards, you know womething is up.

Like, the b450 pro4 motherboard is perfectly acceptable, just put a 4 phase with doubler, or 6 phase with doubler VRM on it! There is plenty of room! colorful seems to have made a proper x570 micro ATX board, but I just cant find any good teardowns or reviews of it, and at $269, thats too much $$$ to try it myself.
If it's no problem to make a Threadripper ITX board, manufacturers can handle a mATX X570/B550 one.

But I'm less concerned about the VRM. Z390 mATX MBs have all the goodies - wifi, good cooling, lot's of I/O ports and front panel headers... X570 got pooped on really hard in that matter, especially considering it's superior in specs in almost every way to Intel chip.
Posted on Reply
#56
TourDeForce
B550 will be awesome for those not running a top line CPU, if it includes PCIE 4.0 for the storage solution and appropriate high speed memory support. I'd be in.
If you're not hard-core overclocking the VRMs won't have to be so robust, and the chipset will likely not require dedicated active cooling.
As of now I'm running a B350 with a Zen 3600 and 3200 Mhz RAM. I'd upgrade, for sure.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Mar 7th, 2025 07:26 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts