Wednesday, September 2nd 2020

Intel 11th Gen Core "Tiger Lake" & Xe Graphics Launch Event: Live Blog

Intel today launches its 11th Gen Core "Tiger Lake" mobile processors that introduce several new technologies on the backs of new IP. As described in the Architecture Day, "Tiger Lake" is built on the 10 nm SuperFin process, and combines new "Willow Cove" CPU cores with the first commercial debut of the Xe Gen12 graphics architecture that Intel is betting big on, to make a stab at the consumer graphics and scalar compute markets. Join us in this live-blog.

Update 16:00 UTC: GB (Gregory Bryant, EVP Client), leads the event from the comfort of his home.
Update 16:04 UTC: Here it is, the "world's best processor for thin and light laptops. You'll notice that like most Intel U-segment chips, this is an MCM of the processor and PCH die. Intel bases its "world's best" claims on a per-segment basis.
Update 16:05 UTC: Acer, Dell, HP, Lenovo, and Samsung have devices with 11th Gen Core processor. Devices as light as 870 g, or lighter than the original Apple iPad. 50+ designs are expected for Holiday 2020, 150 will be available eventually.
Update 16:07 UTC: Intel's new corporate identity takes flight with the new logos.
Update 16:08 UTC: 10 nm SuperFin: 60 poly pitch transistor, improved gate process, higher mobility, lower drain resistance. We detailed this process node here.

Update 16:08 UTC: Super MIM capacitor is the second key component of 10 nm SuperFin. 20% iso power improvements.
Update 16:10 UTC: 20% CPU IPC uplift, 2x iGPU performance uplift, 5x AI performance uplift, I/O improvements from Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe gen 4. Find out more about the Willow Cove core and CPU performance uplift in our technical article here.
Update 16:11 UTC: LP/DDR5 memory support for future memory. "A processor evolved"

Update 16:12 UTC: Tiger Lake compact logic board for 2-in-1 tablets.
Update 16:13 UTC: AI-accelerated performance much higher than AMD 4800U, as is CPU-heavy workloads. Much of Intel's design focus with this generation has been to leverage new AI-acceleration ISA, and suggest practical client-segment applications of the technology, such as in the area of video conferencing, where AI can be used to clear up your audio or blur/replace your background.
Update 16:15 UTC: Intel claims iGPU gaming performance lead over AMD's 4800U, including FPS. The Iris Xe represents a generational leap in performance for Intel, and we've been tracking performance benchmarks of this solution for several months now, where it's been trading blows with AMD's Vega-based iGPUs.
Update 16:18 UTC: Intel DLBoost will be heavily leveraged for AI-accelerated video-conferencing enhancements and background noise removal.
Update 16:18 UTC: Project Athena I/O. With this generation, USB4, Thunderbolt 4 (80 Gbps), and type-C ports take center-stage. Type-A USB will get increasingly rare. This means a whole ecosystem of new USB connectors, adapters, storage devices, and more, on the anvil.
Update 16:20 UTC: 1-second availability, like an iPad, fast charging, with 40% charge in 30 minutes. A fast-charging standard for laptops was much needed. Modern batteries charge at much higher voltages.
Update 16:22 UTC: New corporate identity.
Update 16:29 UTC: Intel EVO powered by Core. It's when 11th Gen Core meets Project Athena. The last time we had such a processor+platform umbrella brand, was with Intel Centrino, from the early 2000s.
Update 16:31 UTC: And that's a wrap for this session. In the next one, we'll cover the underlying architecture.

We will flesh out this whole post with more details over the next half hour, content will update automatically

Update 17:34 UTC: Intel gets into a technical deep-dive of "Tiger Lake"
Update 17:38 UTC: Intel posts some of its first performance guidance for Tiger Lake vs. 4800U.
Update 17:41 UTC: Earlier Gregory Bryant, and now Chris Walker, two top Intel execs refer to AMD as "our imitators" rather than "the competition." Clearly Ryzen APUs has Intel rattled, especially with AMD preparing two new APU silicons in 2021.

Update 17:44 UTC: Intel EVO is a combination of Intel Core + Project Athena. Kinda like Intel Centrino, from the 2000s.
Update 17:46 UTC: Intel highlights its software Software Enabling Engine ecosystem.
Update 17:48 UTC: Intel is betting bigger on AI, going beyond just DLBoost instruction sets.
Update 17:51 UTC: Intel develops new DLBoost DP4a evolved instruction set and new GNA accelerator engine.
Update 17:56 UTC: An overview of how Tiger Lake is an online collaboration solution powerhouse.
Update 17:58 UTC: Here it is! The first die-shot of TGL 4-core die, complete with its new I/O, interfaces. We get to see how much real-estate is taken up by the CPU cores in comparison to the Gen12 Xe iGPU.
Update 17:59 UTC: And here's the die-shot of the PCH die. On TGL-U, the PCH die sits on the same package, and talks over in-package DMI.
Update 18:00 UTC: Intel details its 10 nm SuperFin foundry node, which was detailed in Intel's Architecture Day brief.
Update 18:02 UTC: "Future Tiger Lake launches" our first hint that Intel isn't stopping with the U-segment.

Update 18:03 UTC: An overview of the "Willow Cove" CPU core, we detailed this in our Architecture Day brief.
Update 18:05 UTC: Here's the Gen12 Xe iGPU solution, based on Xe LP.
Update 18:06 UTC: This slide details how Intel addressed on-die bandwidth among the CPU- ,iGPU, and memory controllers.
Update 18:07 UTC: Display- and Audio- I/O come together with a focus on enhanced online collaboration enhancements.
Update 18:08 UTC: USB 4 and Thunderbolt 4 are the two major new I/O features, along with four CPU-attached PCIe Gen 4 lanes for SSDs.
Update 18:09 UTC: A comprehensive power-management solution is at play, which can dynamically wake up resources as they're needed.
Update 18:11 UTC: An illustration of DVFS. The fabric, memory, and CPU frequency domains are de-coupled.
Update 18:13 UTC: Tiger Lake SoC architecture at a glance.
Update 18:15 UTC: Intel elaborates on Intel Xe LP architecture that goes into the Gen12 Xe iGPU of Tiger Lake.Large selection of performance benchmarks.
Update 18:17 UTC: Here it is, the Iris Xe Graphics Solution.
Update 18:18 UTC: Xe features Variable Rate Shading Tier-1, which should significantly improve performance.
Update 18:20 UTC: The Xe Software Stack
Update 18:20 UTC: 1080p gaming on an Intel iGPU finally possible.
Update 18:21 UTC: Intel is beating AMD's "Renoir" graphics.
Update 18:22 UTC: ...and NVIDIA's GeForce MX350 discrete graphics solution.
Update 18:23 UTC: Dual Channel memory a "requirement" to ensure sufficient iGPU performance, notebook vendors can't cut corners with single-channel.
Update 18:24 UTC: Gaming + Streaming on iGPU.
Update 18:25 UTC: Ready for next-generation entertainment thanks to hardware decode for the latest video formats.
Update 18:26 UTC: Here it is, the complete product stack of the 11th Gen Core "Tiger Lake" mobile processors. TDP is no longer a flat value.
Update 18:30 UTC: Intel's Turbo Technology design overview.
Update 18:33 UTC: TDP across the form-factors.
Update 18:34 UTC: Consistency in performance between "AC and DC" (when plugged in vs. on battery)
Update 18:35 UTC: Benchmarks - Productivity, and AI performance.
Update 18:39 UTC: Intel talks about real-world benchmarks.
Update 18:43 UTC: A summary of 11th Gen Core "Tiger Lake"
Update 18:45 UTC: Intel DG1 discrete graphics announced!

Tech Q&A Session:
  • When will these devices be available? 150 platform designs across consumer and commercial. 50 of those will be available this Holiday season, starting October. 20 of those will be the new "EVO" platform.
  • Is the "Iris" Xe graphics core the same as the UHD architecture? It's the new Xe core across the whole product line from i3 to i7. For the higher-end Iris Xe brand you must have dual-channel and higher core count.
  • What's the change in ring frequency vs ICL? The ring is no longer statically bound to CPU freq via ratio but it senses what freq it needs dynamically. For example with 4.8 GHz CPU core, the ring can run very close to that, and even as low at Willow Cove on idle.
  • What is the benefit of OpenVino? OpenVino is toolkit that provides developers with pre-trained AI models, which helps accelerate their development. Means they don't have to design and train an AI. It's open source, Python and C++. The library also supports all major data types, including INT8.
  • How soon will 11th gen desktops catch up? Stay tuned for those announcements. Next year we will release TGL [mobile] it into commercial, also Celeron and Pentiums.
  • How are the PCIe lanes distributed? There's 4 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. So you would either connect a SSD to the PCH and use discrete graphics, or connect the discrete directly to the CPU and the SSD to the PCH.
  • UP3/UP4 separation? It is an operating range between 7 and 20 watts. It's really about the density of the board and the form factor. UP4 goes up to 15 W fan-less, thin and lights, sub-12 mm, sub-13" screen size.
  • Die size and transistor count? We're keeping that to ourselves.
  • TGL PCH manufacturing? 14 nm
  • Will all TGL mobile processors be 10 nm? Yes, 10 nm and Superfin.
  • When can we expect vPro SKUs? Next year, also for EVO
  • Peak gaming performance available for EVO? Yes, EVO requires Iris Xe, which also means dual-channel memory
  • Will those improvements, like transistor, metal stack, etc. be only used for mobile? We will apply them on the whole range.
  • Is there a gearing ratio between CPU/GPU/Ringbus? We have several clock and voltage domains. The ring is now able to operate autonomously.
  • PCIe Gen 4 available for UP3 and UP4? Yes
  • Does the PCH offer PCI-Express 4.0? The chipset offers PCI-Express 3.0
  • Will we see discrete graphics paired with Tiger Lake? Yes, but thinner and lighter systems will focus on Iris Xe IGP.
  • Bigger L2 and L3 affect latency? Yes, but our cache also runs much faster now. In many scenarios the latency is less, despite the larger cache
20:05 UTC: Project Athena session is starting now
20:06 UTC: Project Athena focuses on understanding and solving the requirements of the general consumer.
20:07 UTC: All Project Athena laptops come with guarantees, like battery life, responsiveness, etc
20:09 UTC: Tiger Lake is the foundation for the Intel Evo platform.
20:11 UTC: The minimum requirements go well beyond just performance. For example, minimum speaker quality is part of the program, too.
20:14 UTC: Size comparison of Tiger Lake UP4 vs other popular platforms.
20:14 UTC: Just like with AMD/NVIDIA graphics cards, Intel is building a reference design laptop, for which they validate all components. Partners get full access to that design and are free to adapt and improve—and feedback back to Intel.

20:19 UTC: Intel is now talking about the research behind project Athena. They worked with various groups, to get a wide sampling of the product's target audience.

20:25 UTC: Times have changed a lot, especially due to COVID.

20:29 UTC: Intel created various personas that they used as example for specific workload types.
20:31 UTC: They identified four core computing modes that are relevant for Project Athena laptops.
20:34 UTC: Are we ever going back to work in office spaces? What will we need from future laptops?
20:37 UTC: Intel is now presenting their testing methodology to get performance measurements. The traditional benchmarking is way too engineering specific, designed to isolate selected components performance. The new philosophy is to look for users experiences that get delivered, looking at what people do with their laptops. Testing is done with Internet connected, OEM junkware installed, display brightness at normal levels and on battery.
20:46 UTC: One key takeaway is that the feeling of "waiting", which interrupts your workflow, is the driving factor for "perceived" performance. Intel wants to optimize that, even on battery, to deliver a good, responsive, experience.
20:52 UTC: The battery life testing is much more realistic—Intel claims better than anything that exists or has existed in the industry.
That's the end of the presentation, a Q&A session follows.
  • Is there a minimum display resolution for EVO? Yes, Full HD, 1080p
  • Any other criteria like PPI? There's slightly different criteria for each kind of display, like OLED has a higher battery drain, etc. Color depth, contrast ratio are also part of the specifications.
  • How does EVO compare to gaming laptops with discrete graphics? These laptops are designed for general use, including some gaming and movies. Pure gaming laptops will offer better performance if you do nothing but game all day. EVO offers unseen performance per Watt though.
  • Does EVO apply to non-touch or clamshell designs? Yes, and we still insist on minimum levels of responsiveness and battery life.
  • Is the noise cancellation technology specific to the laptop's in-built speakers and microphone? No, it will work with a headset, too, for example.
  • Is there a cost for OEMs to have their laptops verified? It's a co-engineering program, which we've been doing for many years with the OEMs. We're providing the specification guidance a long time ahead and they give us feedback. That's how we make the next-generation laptop.
  • What does EVO stand for? We tested it on a target audience, it gives a sense of flow and evolution—laptop evolved.
Add your own comment

69 Comments on Intel 11th Gen Core "Tiger Lake" & Xe Graphics Launch Event: Live Blog

#26
tabascosauz
KaesarDid anybody actually look in the side notes?
Did Intel just compared a Intel system running 4267MHz memory against AMD 3200MHz

Ohhhh that's a big nono
That's ugly, even for intel...
Maybe everyone already knows that LPDDR4 and DDR4 share neither the same lineage nor performance characteristics, and therefore comparing them directly on MT/s is to compare apples to oranges?

The dual-channel LPDDR4 is within spec for the Intel system and the dual-channel DDR4 also within spec for the AMD system. Are you about to tell me that Ice Lake running LPDDR4-3733 is also an unfair advantage for Intel?
Posted on Reply
#27
Kaesar
tabascosauzMaybe everyone already knows that LPDDR4 and DDR4 don't share the same the same lineage, and therefore comparing them directly on MT/s is to compare apples to oranges?

The dual-channel LPDDR4 is within spec for the Intel system and the dual-channel DDR4 also within spec for the AMD system.
I do agree that they differ. But then, why not share bandwidth, timings?
It seens to me they are not comparing CPU's, but actually Intel's new CPU against some lenovo that happens to use AMD Ryzen mobile CPU in it.
Posted on Reply
#28
tabascosauz
KaesarI do agree that they differ. But then, why not share bandwidth, timings?
It seens to me they are not comparing CPU's, but actually Intel's new CPU against some lenovo that happens to use AMD Ryzen mobile CPU in it.
That "some Lenovo" is as typical and full-fledged a Renoir configuration you're going to find, and knowing how past 14nm and Ice Lake ultraportables have turned out, Intel's own TGL demonstrator is probably pretty close to what a TGL ultrabook will eventually be configurated as. What do you propose, Intel devote their time to create a special performance-enhanced development platform laptop for their competitor's product? This isn't a desktop; you can only use existing Renoir products to represent Renoir performance, and as far as I can see the laptop they chose isn't hamstrung on a hardware front.

Firmware-wise, we don't know. Lenovo does some strange things with power limits on Intel laptops by handicapping them to strictly their TDP. With Renoir, AMD has given OEMs a lot of flexibility when it comes to the performance parameters that they can choose.
Posted on Reply
#29
Kaesar
tabascosauzThat "some Lenovo" is as typical and full-fledged a Renoir configuration you're going to find, and knowing how past 14nm and Ice Lake ultraportables have turned out, Intel's own TGL demonstrator is probably pretty close to what a TGL ultrabook will eventually be configurated as. What do you propose, Intel devote their time to create a special performance-enhanced development platform laptop for their competitor's product? This isn't a desktop; you can only use existing Renoir products to represent Renoir performance, and as far as I can see the laptop they chose isn't hamstrung on a hardware front.
Again, I do agree with you, it is not the same thing as comparing desktop CPUs, where you can use the exact same memory or GPU, so you can only look at CPU results.
But, about creating special enhanced system, to be clear, I'm not saying they did, but it would not be the first time. Not so long ago, they presented a Xeon 28 core CPU live demonstration, runing a very, and I mean very special cooling unit to maintain a very high level of overclock, that they never mentioned when presenting it, only days later after people saw a weird photo of a pipe just chilling away from the system.
If it was apples to apples, then show us the full spec of memory, they have a dedicated page to all systems they used, why not put memory specs also?
Posted on Reply
#30
Steevo
"
Mobile U-Series Gaming Play GTAV with up to 1.29x more FPS with a 11th Gen Intel® Core™ i7-1185G7 vs. AMD Ryzen 7 4800U Intel Core i7-1185G7 Processor Intel® Core™ i7-1185G7 processor (TGL-U) PL1=28W, 4C8T, Memory: 2x16GB LPDDR4-4267Mhz, Storage: Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-0000, Display Resolution: 1920 x 1080, OS: Microsoft Windows* 10 Pro 10.0.19041.388*, Graphics: Intel® Xe Graphics, Graphics driver: 27.20.100.8431*, Bios version: T14C4II6.92A measured on pre-production Intel reference system *Graphics Driver: Gfx-driver-ci-master-5580 for Doom Eternal *OS: Windows 10 Pro 10.0.19041.450 for Battlefield V Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 4800U processor, 8C16T, Memory: 2x8GB DDR4-3200MHz, Storage: Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L2, Display Resolution: 1920 x 1080, OS: Microsoft Windows* 10 Pro 10.0.19041.388 *, Graphics: AMD Radeon(TM) Graphics, Graphics driver: 27.20.2001.9003*, Bios version: E7CN25WW measured on OEM system based on highest available performance profile. * Graphics Driver: 27.20.2001.13001 for Battlefield V, Gears Tactics, and GRID 2019. * OS: Windows 10 Pro 10.0.19041.450 for Battlefield V and Gears Tactics. As measured by GTAV (1080p Medium) August 20th,


edc.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/performance/benchmarks/11th-generation-intel-core-mobile-processors/

www.amd.com/en/products/apu/amd-ryzen-7-4800u



So, a 28W 4C8T 4267Mhz RAM vs a 15W 8C16T with 3200Mhz RAM.


Congrats on shitty comparison Intel, so in all reality Xe is about 25% slower than AMD APU hardware.
Posted on Reply
#31
tabascosauz
KaesarIf it was apples to apples, then show us the full spec of memory, they have a dedicated page to all systems they used, why not put memory specs also?
How exactly would that tell you anything that you don't already know now? They already have the memory specs up on that page. LPDDR4 clocks and timings aren't static like DDR4, they constantly fluctuate with using the laptop, and again, neither of those directly comparable between LPDDR4 and DDR4. If it's an AIDA benchmark run you want Intel to do (which by itself can be laughably bad at representing real-world bandwidth), that would neither seek to further their presentation or our understanding of the product in any way.

Renoir also purportedly supports LPDDR4-4266; the problem is that most Renoir chips end up in thicker laptops with SO-DIMM slots, so no OEMs bother to put in the work to design a LPDDR4-based Renoir laptop because the other 10 SKUs all use soldered or socketed DDR4. You can't test what doesn't exist.

And even had there been a LPDDR4 Renoir ultrabook, I highly doubt the Vega iGPU would see any gains compared to dual-channel DDR4-3200. Same goes for Tiger Lake, there's no reason why LPDDR4-4266 makes it magically faster. LPDDR4 is for power efficiency, not performance. Renoir already achieves fantastic battery life improvements with DDR4.

IIRC, LPDDR4 literally has half the bus width of DDR4.

The point of concern you're looking for here is the continued use of high turbo frequencies that draw power way beyond TDP and PL2. PL1 and PL2 are in the hands of laptop manufacturers, and there's often nothing that can be done if the OEM decides to set PL2 at strictly TDP, which absolutely hobbles your long-term turbo performance. That's something we'll only know from laptop reviewers once the products hit the market.
Posted on Reply
#32
Steevo
tabascosauzHow exactly would that tell you anything that you don't already know now? They already have the memory specs up on that page. LPDDR4 clocks and timings aren't static like DDR4, they constantly fluctuate with using the laptop, and again, neither of those directly comparable between LPDDR4 and DDR4. If it's an AIDA benchmark run you want Intel to do (which by itself can be laughably bad at representing real-world bandwidth), that would neither seek to further their presentation or our understanding of the product in any way.

Renoir also purportedly supports LPDDR4-4266; the problem is that most Renoir chips end up in thicker laptops with SO-DIMM slots, so no OEMs bother to put in the work to design a LPDDR4-based Renoir laptop because the other 10 SKUs all use soldered or socketed DDR4. You can't test what doesn't exist.

And even had there been a LPDDR4 Renoir ultrabook, I highly doubt the Vega iGPU would see any gains compared to dual-channel DDR4-3200. Same goes for Tiger Lake, there's no reason why LPDDR4-4266 makes it magically faster. LPDDR4 is for power efficiency, not performance. Renoir already achieves fantastic battery life improvements with DDR4.

IIRC, LPDDR4 literally has half the bus width of DDR4.

The point of concern you're looking for here is the continued use of high turbo frequencies that draw power way beyond TDP and PL2. PL1 and PL2 are in the hands of laptop manufacturers, and there's often nothing that can be done if the OEM decides to set PL2 at strictly TDP, which absolutely hobbles your long-term turbo performance. That's something we'll only know from laptop reviewers once the products hit the market.
28 W Intel part VS 15 W AMD part, so by default it makes the Intel part 25% shittier just by default, then add in that the Intel part has half the cores, and their testing is using plugged in power profiles with, you are correct, unknown cooling for the Intel part.
Posted on Reply
#33
Houd.ini
Are intel really that stupid to use so skewed benchmarks?
Posted on Reply
#34
Dante Uchiha
tabascosauzHow exactly would that tell you anything that you don't already know now? They already have the memory specs up on that page. LPDDR4 clocks and timings aren't static like DDR4, they constantly fluctuate with using the laptop, and again, neither of those directly comparable between LPDDR4 and DDR4. If it's an AIDA benchmark run you want Intel to do (which by itself can be laughably bad at representing real-world bandwidth), that would neither seek to further their presentation or our understanding of the product in any way.

Renoir also purportedly supports LPDDR4-4266; the problem is that most Renoir chips end up in thicker laptops with SO-DIMM slots, so no OEMs bother to put in the work to design a LPDDR4-based Renoir laptop because the other 10 SKUs all use soldered or socketed DDR4. You can't test what doesn't exist.

And even had there been a LPDDR4 Renoir ultrabook, I highly doubt the Vega iGPU would see any gains compared to dual-channel DDR4-3200. Same goes for Tiger Lake, there's no reason why LPDDR4-4266 makes it magically faster. LPDDR4 is for power efficiency, not performance. Renoir already achieves fantastic battery life improvements with DDR4.

IIRC, LPDDR4 literally has half the bus width of DDR4.

The point of concern you're looking for here is the continued use of high turbo frequencies that draw power way beyond TDP and PL2. PL1 and PL2 are in the hands of laptop manufacturers, and there's often nothing that can be done if the OEM decides to set PL2 at strictly TDP, which absolutely hobbles your long-term turbo performance. That's something we'll only know from laptop reviewers once the products hit the market.
It's not like a smartphone... LPDDR4X 4266 in dual-channel effectively results in 68Gbps of bandwidth(vs 52Gbps on DDR43200Mhz), and this obviously has an effect on iGPU performance. I won't even comment about the 50w TDP...
Posted on Reply
#35
_Flare
If they burst to 50W often and guarantee x hours of batterylife, those will get expensive
Posted on Reply
#36
AxilomX

50W at boost vesus a cpu that maxes out at 25W....hmmmm back to it's old pr tricks
Posted on Reply
#37
Dave65
Well, Intel who claims benchmarks should not matter, apparently these benchmarks matter to them...
Posted on Reply
#38
thesmokingman
KaesarDid anybody actually look in the side notes?
Did Intel just compared a Intel system running 4267MHz memory against AMD 3200MHz

Ohhhh that's a big nono
That's ugly, even for intel...
That's actually mild considering its from the same guys that hid a 1kw chiller under the table. :roll:
Posted on Reply
#40
R0H1T
tabascosauzRenoir also purportedly supports LPDDR4-4266; the problem is that most Renoir chips end up in thicker laptops with SO-DIMM slots, so no OEMs bother to put in the work to design a LPDDR4-based Renoir laptop because the other 10 SKUs all use soldered or socketed DDR4. You can't test what doesn't exist.
Well if you bother putting up a mild effort you can find it, alas Intel's being Intel :shadedshu:
And I wouldn't be surprised in the least bit if OEMs were paid to avoid putting this LPDDR4x on top end Ryzen, especially given it's relatively cheap being the bog standard on all mobiles these days & ICL only supporting up to 3733 MHz!
www.tomshardware.com/news/lenovo-yoga-slim-7-review-tested
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Specifications
CPUAMD Ryzen 7 4800U
GraphicsAMD Radeon Graphics
RAM16GB DDR4 4266 MHz
SSD512GB SK Hynix SSD
Display14-inch, 1920 x 1080, IPS display
NetworkingIntel Wi-Fi 6 AX 201 (2x2), Bluetooth 5
PortsUSB 3.2 Type-C, USB-C PD, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, micro SD card reader, HDMI, 3.5 mm headphone jack
Camera720p, IR
Battery60.7 WHr
Power Adapter65W
Operating SystemWindows 10 Home
Dimensions (WxDxH)12.6 x 8.2 x 0.6 inches / 320.6 x 208 x 14.9 mm
Weight3.8 pounds / 1.4 kg
Price (as configured)€999.00, Not available as configured in the United States
Posted on Reply
#41
my_name_is_earl
I hate this Intel built-in CPU graphic chip. It just interfere with my discrete graphic and causes problem. That's why I opt to buy 9900kf instead of the stupid 9900k.
Posted on Reply
#42
Caring1
my_name_is_earlI hate this Intel built-in CPU graphic chip. It just interfere with my discrete graphic and causes problem. That's why I opt to buy 9900kf instead of the stupid 9900k.
So how is that working out for you in a laptop?
Posted on Reply
#43
watzupken
I rather wait for actual results before making a conclusion on Tiger Lake. I feel Intel hyped up TGL quite a fair bit, but the announcement don't bring anything exciting to the table. I certainly will not use their benchmark result as golden considering their shady benchmark tactics. It is certainly not unexpected that they will gimp the AMD system to give themselves an advantage. Memory speed is certainly in favor of Intel when they claim a 60+ % improvement. Graphics are highly sensitive to memory speed.

I still stand by my opinion that this SuperFin is not as great as they claimed to be. I feel is just allow the existing 10nm to take in more power (on top of some efficiency gain), and thus, allow a higher clockspeed. Basically they are just pushing 10nm to be like 14nm to run at higher clockspeed. At least it is good to see healthy IPC improvement from Intel, and not another improvement to clockspeed only. Power requirement increase will show in battery tests.
my_name_is_earlI hate this Intel built-in CPU graphic chip. It just interfere with my discrete graphic and causes problem. That's why I opt to buy 9900kf instead of the stupid 9900k.
I don't know if it is a driver problem though.
Posted on Reply
#45
GreiverBlade
i dropped the reading after the "world's best processor" slide ... :roll:

alright maybe i read more thoroughly ... i have a bit of time to waste and a good laugh will not hurt ...
Posted on Reply
#46
Vya Domus
12-28W and different memory speeds. So in reality it's not that it probably isn't as fast as AMD's 4 year old Vega iGPUs it's probably worse when equalized for power or memory speeds.

Nice try. Intel manages to make every single chart they show worthless and deceiving without fault. That's quite the feat, I know every company tries to do same but no has been as consistent as Intel. Whenever you see one their benchmarks might as well look at brick wall instead, you're going to find out just as much.
Posted on Reply
#47
londiste
Vya Domus12-28W
Nice try. Intel manages to make every single chart they show worthless and deceiving. That's quite the feat, I know every company tries to do same but no has been as consistent as Intel.
That is probably least deceiving part of it. 4800U that they are comparing 1185G7 to is as much a "15W" CPU as 1185G7 is.
Posted on Reply
#48
Vya Domus
londiste4800U that they are comparing 1165G7 to is as much a "15W" CPU as 1165G7 is.
We both know which one of two is going to have the bigger discrepancy in terms of power.
Posted on Reply
#49
londiste
Vya DomusWe both know which one of two is going to have the bigger discrepancy in terms of power.
Probably not by much this time around. On slides we see 1185H7 with a short peak around 50W and then staying at 28W limit. 4800U reviews show it peaking at 41-42W, sometimes a little more and staying long-term at 25W. Intel might have chosen a 15W-limited 4800U for comparison but shown results seem to hint at that not being the case.
Posted on Reply
#50
AsRock
TPU addict
I'l believe it when i see proof, loosing faith in intel.

Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 22nd, 2024 06:02 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts