Wednesday, November 4th 2020
![NVIDIA](https://tpucdn.com/images/news/nvidia-v1723408558483.png)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Renderings Emerge
The launch of the rumored NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti graphics card has reportedly been pushed from November 17th to December 2nd. We are beginning to receive more rumors about the upcoming offering with renderings of the Gigabyte Eagle GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC being discovered by Videocardz. The Gigabyte Eagle GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC features a dual-fan cooler with a relatively small PCB and a factory-applied overclock. The RTX 3060 Ti is expected to feature 4864 CUDA cores, 152 Tensor cores, and 38 RT cores along with 8 GB GDDR6 memory running at 14 Gbps which should offer performance close to the RTX 2080 Super. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has the potential to be a strong mid-range offering with a TDP of 180w and is expected to retail for ~ 400 USD.
Source:
Videocardz
32 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Renderings Emerge
sick topical low availability burn!
especially AIB is known for marked up the price and overlapped price between two SKU is quite common.
300$ sure, 350$ maybe, 400$ definitely NOT.
I wouldnt call a 3060ti a low end card either. There's the 3060 and presumably a 3050(?) and 3040(?) below that. Look at their last product stack...the 1650 started at $150...
1650, 1650 super, 1660, 1660 super, 1660ti, rtx 2060, 2060 super, 2070, 2070 super, 2080, 2080 super, 2080ti, titan. 8 tiers not counting the super cards. The 3060ti is Nvidia's 4th card. Most would call it midrange...not low end.
Ya'll price haters (amd and nvidia) need to put the nomenclature on the back burner and look at performance for the price IMO (and figure out this is a midrange card in the first place). Want to bet this easily beats a 2060 super ($400 msrp) and a gtx 1080 ($600 msrp)? Considering the 3070 matches a 2080ti, id imagine a 3060ti to be maybe 10-15% behind which puts it at 2080-2080 super levels which are $700-$800 cards. That would put this 3060ti 20-25% more performance for the same price as 2060 super.
Still, time does pass, but this is definitely not cheap or competitive for its place in the stack. Neither is a 3070 at 500. We all know this. Only competition over those price points can confirm it.
In another way you could say there is some noticeable RT tax happening in the line up of both camps, perhaps.
2070S was $500 and performed the same as a $700 card (1080ti, a flagship). This gen you have the 3070 ($500) as fast as 2080ti ($1100).
Again, we'd all like to pay less, but feels like it settled well
I'm feeling a Deja Vu here. I feel like I made the same kind of post somewhere before here...
Today's high-end costs more than yesterday's high-end, today's midrange costs more than yesterday's midrange, etc.
700 for an x80. That is the so-called 'cheap' baseline the rest gets based off. :kookoo::oops:
3090 = 1100, titan = 2400
3080 = 800, 2080ti = 999
3070 = 500, 2070 = 599. we are? See above. Doesnt look like it to me. I get it isnt as cheap as pre turing (only $100 off of xx80 cards) but its cheaper than turing. So like I said... can the above actually be refuted? How isnt it an improvement? What am I missing?
With amd's pricing where it is with rdna2, things won't get cheaper next gen..
The 2080(S) is the 3080
Etc.
Where is this Titan in the Geforce stack for Turing even?!
I'm not sure what you're smoking here but damn son, don't smoke those leather jackets along with it... you don't see things clearly anymore.
I'd also like to remind you of this
1080ti = 699
980ti = 799
Yeah, Ampere is so cheap. o_O Especially given its weak node, high TDP and so-so VRAM cap...
Sure, they do when compared to products with out of space like prices, when compared to anything other than that (literally all the previous generations on nvidia cards) then not so much. Why is this so hard to get? The whole disconnect with turing family was a total outlier and should never be used for comparison, performance or price wise, EVER.
What I don't agree with is the selective use of what price to base the cards on. "zOMG Turing is so off the wall you can't use that".... but we're comparing previous generations........right?! Now AMD's card are out and around the same price and performance (better of course, the point is they are much higher than their previous attempts. Fastest card in the stack. I don't care if they call it a Ti or a Titan or a Potato... that is like vs. like right now... suddenly we can't compare the stack from top to bottom...? You're adding artificial dividers trying to match up 'names'. Which, I get.... but for this excersise, I think it's prudent to start top down. Fastest and most expensive card vs fastest and most expensive card of the previous generation. Does it really matter what the name is? This product stack's highest end vs previous gen product stack's highest end.... Reminding me of an anomoly in flagship pricing is not remotely helpful or poignant. You know damn well that doesn't happen often at all. That said, looks like it sort of did here if you compare the stack (and drop the naming conventions). You guys are putting these in buckets and seeming forgetting about the notable performance uptick (at least it feels this way from both of your responses). lolololololOsaurus. I see things quite clearly. The difference is we don't agree on that point. Please don't start to be demeaning in this conversation...
One last time.... :) This is, without a doubt, an improvement over Turing. You can twist it however you want. :)
....and a 3060Ti isn't a "low range" card either. lol
Cheers, boys. :toast:
And the rest follows logically after that.
A 3090 is just a Geforce with more VRAM like all the rest.
www.tweaktown.com/news/75147/nvidias-next-gen-titan-rtx-specs-teased-48gb-gddr6x-and-over-3000/index.html
There isn't a gaming card above the 3090 (right now), the Titan RTX and 3090 are both, quite clearly, crossover cards. The Titan does more compute work, we get that, but that also isn't the point. Quadro is their professional line and that has nothing to do with these cards.
3090 / Titan RTX
3090 / 2080 Ti
3080 / 2080
3070 / 2070.
We'll simply have to agree to disagree and move on. :)
EDIT: LOL @ tweaktown rumor... when it comes out (its rumor and vaporware as of two months ago...nothing since), let's have this talk again, shall we?
Now put the MSRPs next to it. And even then you're still comparing only to Turing, the least sensible comparison as AMD didn't play ball in this segment at all and RT got introduced - early adopter tax. How is early adopter's tax a norm all of a sudden?!
Everything is an improvement over Turing, but that still doesn't make it good.